Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
..... forum, allowing the consumer complaint in question, was upheld. 2. brief facts of the case are that the petitioner municipal board, todaraisingh, district tonk, rajasthan is a statutory body created under the rajasthan municipalities act, 1959. the petitioner issued a public advertisement on 18.06.1968 for auction sale of 19 residential plots, situated ..... site of auction and the balance 3/4th of the auction price was to be deposited within one month from the date of the demand raised by the municipal board. the respondent/complainant participated in the auction for plot no. 9, measuring 60ft. x 40ft. on 28.06.1968 and his auction bid @ ..... under section 21(b) of the consumer protection act, 1986 by the petitioner against the impugned order dated 17.12.2007 passed by the rajasthan state consumer disputes redressal commission (for short the state commission) in fa no. 2236/2006, municipal board, todarraisingh through chairman, municipal board, todaraisingh and anr. versus gopal lal sharma .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
..... compound constructed by the association and restore the earlier compound wall. the buildings are getting metro waters and the open space area stands transferred to ambathur municipality. no other deficiency was pointed but by this local commissioner. third report 35. third local commissioners report is dated 26.6.2006. thiru c. ..... deposited with the madras metro water supply and sewerage board for drinking supply. inside the colonies, concrete road have been made. necessary deposits were reported to municipal. authorities. three roads have been completed and black-topped, street lights have been provided. construction of compound wall around have been provided. sewerage lines have ..... m. ismail faruqui and others, (1994) 1 scc 265, wherein in para 12, it was held: 12. it was next contended that such complicated questions of facts cannot be decided in summary proceedings. in our view, this submission also requires to be rejected because under the act, for summary or speedy trial, exhaustive .....
Tag this Judgment!