Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: manipur municipalities act 1994 section 155 supply of drinking water Page 8 of about 234 results (1.113 seconds)

The Kurnool Municipality Vs. the Civic Association and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1973CriLJ1227

..... officers. the lower court, viz.. judicial first class magistrate. kurnool. however, without really going to the question raised whether section 375 of the municipalities act is applicable to the facts of the case or not dismissed the petition taking the view that having taken cognizance of the offence once rightly or wrongly ..... have to be quashed and secondly, even otherwise the sanction of the government not having been obtained as provided under section 375 of the municipalities act the lower court erred in taking cognizance of the offence and no cognizance should have been taken by it without such sanction.3. ..... sanction of the government as contemplated under section 375 of the andhra pradesh municipalities act (hereinafter referred to as the 'municipalities act'). the petition was resisted by the civic association, the complainant, alleging that the complaint is not laid against any officer of the municipality in which case only sanction of the government as required under section .....

Rameshwar Prasad and ors. Vs. Municipal Board Pilibhit and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1958All841

..... power to dismiss he has also the power to remove.but then removal must be by way of punishment. the whole scheme of section 76 of the u. p. municipalities act shows that the power conferred on the executive officer under that section was confined to cases of disciplinary action and not to those of termination of services by notice. ..... other than those covered by the aforesaid sections.my attention has been invited by the learned counsel appearing for the state to section 71 of the u. p. municipalities act and it is contended that the aforesaid order has been issued under that section. section 71 runs as follows :'71. except as provided by sections 57, 66, 68 ..... , learned counsel for the petitioners, with regard to the ground relating to the nature of the government order dated 10-4-1950. there is no provision in the municipalities act apart from the provisions of section 57, 66, 68 and 70, which gives the government the power to lay down the conditions of service or the qualifications of .....

Chandrikaben Kapilbhai Joshi Vs. Collector and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1996)3GLR477

..... joshi is the actual brother-in-law of the respondent no. 1 and therefore, as per the provisions contained in section ll(2)(c) of the gujarat municipalities act, 1963, who cannot have save as hereinafter provided has directly or indirectly by himself or by his partner any share or interest in any work done by order ..... been accepted and also the fact about the contract of supply of cement and metal having been given to said dharmendra narmadashankar joshi.4. the relevant provisions of the municipalities act reads as under:11.(2) no person -(a) xxx xxx xxx xxx(b) xxx xxx xxx xxx(c) who, save as hereinafter provided, has directly or ..... 3. the brief facts which led to this petition are that the petitioner was elected as councillor from savarkundla in november 1994. the savarkundla municipality under slum clearance scheme had undetaken construction of concrete roads within the municipal limits for which it had invited tenders for supply of cement, concrete metal, stone etc. tender for supply of .....

Sri R Chandrahasa Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... act, 1994 provides for a protection of two years, rajasthan panchayati raj act, 1994 provides for a protection of year, rajasthan municipalities act, 2009 provides for ..... , 1993 provides for a protection of two and a half years, madhya pradesh municipalities act, 1961provides for a protection of two years and one year, manipur panchayati raj act, 1994 provides for a protection of two years and one year, orissa panchayat samiti act, 1959 provides for a protection of two years, orissa grama panchayats act, 1964 provides for a protection of two years, punjab panchayati raj .....

Navneet Arora Vs. Surender Kaur and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... are descendants from a common ancestor and shall include wives or husbands, as the case may be, of its member, but shall exclude married daughters and their children. [manipur municipalities act (43 of 1994), s. 2(27)]. [emphasis supplied].34. iravati karve opines that a joint family is a group of people who generally live under one roof, who eat food ..... hon'ble mr. justice pradeep nandrajog hon'ble ms. justice mukta gupta pradeep nandrajog, j.1. late sh.harpal singh arora was the registered owner of property bearing municipal no.b-44, vishal enclave rajouri garden, new delhi. he acquired ownership under a perpetual lease dated june 07, 1974 executed in his favour by the ..... municipal corporation of delhi. when he purchased the property on perpetual lease-hold basis, it consisted of only the ground floor. he constructed two floors above and sold .....

Baburao Govindrao Shirbhate and ors. Vs. the Collector, Amravati and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1976Bom110

..... belated prayer cannot be granted. it was also observed that aggrieved petitioners had also an alternate remedy of the petition as provided by section 21 of the maharashtra municipalities act. in the result, therefore the division bench of this court, discharged the rule in that matter which raised substantially the same challenge that is now being agitated ..... others was found to be defective and leave to add additional parties was refused directing him to the remedy of filing the petition under section 21 of the maharashtra municipalities act,. 1965. as far as the conduct of petitioner nos. 2 to 5 is concerned, there is nothing better. in the affidavits filed in reply to the ..... to the fact that before such a forum the petitioners may not be in a position to assail the validity of the provision of section 9 of the municipalities act, but we have our doubts whether having asserted right under that provisions petitioner would at all be entitled to make such challenge. whatever that may been .....

Hakim MoIn UddIn Vs. Shiekh Abdus Samad

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1937All78

..... the hurt or annoyance of the land, tenements or hereditaments of another, without any lawful ground of justification or excuse: vide pollock on torts, p. 422. the municipalities act does not give any power to the boards to deal with the questions of private nuisances or parties' private rights in respect thereof. in abdul qayum khan v. city ..... therefore no jurisdiction to try this suit. the trial court found in favour of the defendant and dismissed the suit holding that it was barred by section 321, municipalities act. on appeal the learned civil judge found that the suit was not barred and remanded the suit to the trial court for decision. against this order of ..... which he may seek in the civil court will not in any way interfere with the orders or directions given by the municipal board referred to under section 321, municipalities act. under the directions of the municipal board it may still be open to the defendant to continue to work his mill but in consideration of the private rights .....

Municipal Board Vs. Ram Kishan

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1933All785; 147Ind.Cas.186

..... correspondence and inquiry were going on would be to make a mere travesty of justice. we consider therefore that the period of limitation of six months in section 326, municipalities act, is not intended to apply to a suit on contracts and therefore it does not bar the plaint in the present case. some allahabad rulings were shown by ..... was therefore a recurring one. in this court this ground has not been urged and a broad ground is urged by learned counsel for the respondent that section 326, municipalities act, is not intended to apply to suits on contract. that section states:no suit shall be instituted against a board, or against a member, officer or servant of ..... before the date of filing of the suit on 25th may 1929. some of the works were completed in 1927. the main question before us is whether section 326, municipalities act, applies or not. the point was urged before the lower court and the court held that that, section did not apply, because the board went on admitting their .....

Laxman Son of Sakharam Balsare Vs. Municipal Council, Warud and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1988(4)BomCR576

..... was sent by the same body as a representative, there was no power of cancelling his representation conferred either by the maharashtra municipalities act or any other statute. thus the cancellation of his representation was ultra vires the powers of the municipal council. in law inspite of the resolution so passed, he continues to be a member of the agricultural produce market committee ..... has power under section 13 (1)(e) of the said 'act to send its representative. the contemplates that the power of the municipal council to send its representative in absence of any other provision either in the maharashtra municipalities act or in the maharashtra agricultural produce marketing (regulation) act, 1963 is uncontrolled. it is admittedly their power and they can exercise this power according to .....

Smt. Kittur YasmIn Riyaz and anr. Vs. Deputy Commissioner and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2009KAR47

..... ) a member, (b) councillor and (c) a political party. all these words are defined under the act as under:section 2(1) - 'councilors ' means a councillor of a municipal corporation or a municipal council or a town panchayat elected under the karnataka municipal corporations act, 1976 or the karnataka municipalities act, 1964 as the case may be.section 2(iii) - ' 'member ' means a member of a zilla ..... panchayath or a talukpanchayath elected under the karnataka panchayath raj act, 1993.section 2(vi) - 'political party' in relation .....