Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: manipur municipalities act 1994 section 155 supply of drinking water Court: kerala Page 1 of about 4 results (0.078 seconds)

Mar 13 1998 (HC)

M.A. Vaheed Vs. Jobai Silva and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1998Ker318

..... the corporation election? the election court held that holding the post of a president of a gram panchayat is not a disqualification under section 90 of the kerala municipalities act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as 'the' act'). the court also found that on 19-8-1995, the date of election notification, petitioner was not a voter in the panchayat and was not an 'ordinary ..... continuing as president and resident of grama panchayat and having not resigned from the said post as per the provisions of the panchayat act, there is a violation of section 178(1)(a) and (d)(iv) of the kerala municipalities act, 1994, and allowed the appeal. hence the revision.8. i have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents in detail .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 09 2005 (HC)

Pradeep Kumar Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2005(4)KLT396

..... .1. the question for consideration is whether the secretary of a municipality is competent to suspend the municipal engineer, invoking section 49(1)(k) of the kerala municipality act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to for short 'the act') and/or rule 15 of the kerala municipal common service rules (for short 'the rules') made under the kerala municipal corporations act, 1961 which stands repealed with effect on and from 30th ..... may, 1994.2. petitioner, while working as municipal engineer in the 4th respondent-municipality, has been placed under suspension as per .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 06 2012 (HC)

Minimol Vs. Director of Municipalities

Court : Kerala

..... giving them greater autonomy and independence. thereafter, in exercise of the power conferred by the said constitutional provisions, the kerala municipality act, 1994 has been enacted, giving effect to the mandate of the constitution. it is under the new municipality act that the present municipal common service has been constituted. under the present set up, the appointing authority as well as the disciplinary authority of the ..... necessary laws conferring such authority on them. it is in exercise of such power that the municipalities act, 1994, has been enacted. 8. section 2(21) defines local authority to mean a municipalities constituted under s.4 of the act. s. 222 provides for the establishment of a common municipal service. sub-s.(1) of the said provision reads as under: 222. constitution of a common .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 30 2015 (HC)

Radhakrishnan Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... detail decisions. raja mahapatra v. board of secondary education orissa. [air1988ori 65]. with reference to the word "convene", it is stated that 'to convene' a meeting under the municipalities act means to call together or to assemble, and not issue notice, for the meeting of members." in ramachary v. state of andhra pradesh [(1964) 2 an wr375, it is ..... in r.3(2) and r.7(2) of the said rules, 1995. the said rules, 1995 have been framed in terms of s.417 of the west bengal municipal act, 1993.23. the word 'convene' cannot be substituted by the word 'hold' as suggested by mr.mitra, learned senior counsel representing the respondent nos.5 to 14 ..... by the fourth respondent herein. by ext.p1 order, the commission, after considering the petition filed under section 35(1)(p) of the kerala panchayat raj act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'), held that the petitioner is not entitled to continue as a member of mayyannad grama panchayat on being disqualified under section 35(1)(p) of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 15 2005 (HC)

Balasubramanyan Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2005(4)KLT882

..... councillor who can challenge the election of the deputy chairperson by filing a petition before the district court, it is contended. the provision in the kerala municipality act cannot be bypassed, it is averred. it is pointed out that the councillors are not impleaded and they are necessary parties. more importantly, it is ..... the deputy chairperson shall start only after the election of the chairperson and declaration of the result thereof are completed.' section 143(2) of the kerala municipality act is extracted hereunder:'143. oath or affirmation--(2) the chairperson and the deputy chairperson shall also, before entering upon their offices, make and subscribe an ..... ) rules, 1995 was violated in the matter of election of the third, respondent. it is his further case that section 143(2) of the kerala municipality act mandates that the deputy chairperson shall make and subscribe such oath or affirmation before the chairperson, after the chairperson has been elected. however, the oath was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 05 2015 (HC)

T.P.Dasan Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... preliminary notification as confirmed under the impugned notifications are absolutely unconstitutional and against the statutory provisions under section 4(2) of the kerala municipalities act, 1994.34. it is crucial to note that the territorial areas now intended to be de-linked from the muncipal corporations were annexed to ..... 2 of section 4 of the kerala municipalities act, 1994, empowers the government to exclude any municipal area from the operation of the act or exclude from a municipal area comprised therein, divide any municipal area into two or more municipal areas or convert a municipal council into a municipal corporation. the proposal under the impugned notification ..... power of the government to constitute or reconstitute wpc no.14218/2015 conn.cases 14 municipalities and municipal corporations are referable from article 243q of the constitution of india and section 4 of the kerala municipalities act, 1994. it was argued that it was after satisfying that the area of the former .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 05 2015 (HC)

Muraleedharan Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... natural justice. there cannot be any doubt regarding the proposition that the exercise of power under article 243 q read with section 4 of the kerala municipality act is legislative in character. a legislation can only be challenged only on the ground of legislative incompetence, violation of fundamental rights and violation of any ..... & 16493 of 2015 -6- company ltd v. the notified area committee, tulsipur [air1980scc882 wherein it was observed that the power of the state government under the municipality act is legislative in character. this court in sreekala and others v. state of kerala [2010 (3) khc385 relying on the decision of state of punjab v. tehal ..... the collector, thane, maharashtra and others [air1990sc261 had set out the scope of interference by the court in a notification issued under the provisions of the municipalities act regarding the delinking of the areas of the local government institution. it was observed that the court cannot lay down norms for the exercise of that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 03 2006 (HC)

George C. Kappan Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2006(3)KLT801

..... government under any provision of law. the order does not also mention that the government had, in fact, chosen to exercise its suo motu powers under the kerala municipalities act. in the above circumstances, ext.p10 order passed on a petition which is not maintainable in law cannot be sustained.accordingly, ext.p10 order is quashed. however, ..... i make it clear that this shall not preclude the government from exercising its suo motu powers under the relevant provisions of the municipalities act. the original petition is allowed as above, but, without any order as to costs. ..... said proceeding petitioner preferred appeal before the municipal council. the municipal council as per ext.p5 resolution took decision for cancellation of the proceedings of the municipal commissioner and accordingly set aside the proceedings of the municipal commissioner. the council acted as per section 364 of the act, the said decision of the municipal council is final and binding subject to review .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 12 1999 (HC)

Rural India Handicrafts Marketing Association Vs. Kottayam Municipalit ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR2000Ker30

..... now, let us look at the bye-laws. as already stated, the bye-law is issued by the kottayam municipality with regard to the allotment of the k.c. mamman mappila hall under section 567 of the kerala municipalities act. the bye-law is published in the kerala gazette dated 30-12-1997. the bye-law has come into ..... 1999. (4) the proceedings of the meeting of the municipal council, kottayam. which was held on 30-7-1099. since these ..... were shown to me :(1) the proceedings of the kottayam municipal council dated 5-7-1999. (2) the bye-law regarding the allotment of k. c. mamman mappila hall issued by the kottayam municipality under section 567 of the kerala municipalities act. (3) the notice issued by the kottayam municipality dated 23-7-1999 for the special meeting on 30-7- .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 04 1953 (HC)

M.K. Chacko Vs. Kottayam Municipality

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 1954CriLJ1138

..... with the requirements as laid down in the provision regulating the issue of such a notice.the question of the validity of a notice issued under the united provinces municipalities act came up for consideration in - 'emperor v. piari lal' air 1914 all 41 (e). there it was ruled that before any one could be convicted of ..... also and it has to be held that the question of limitation raised by the revision petitioner has to be determined with reference to section 366 of the district municipalities act.4. the next aspect to be considered is about the starting point of the period of limitation prescribed under section 366. 'the relevant provisions to be considered ..... prosecution of this kind have not been satisfied in the present case.2. the question of limitation may be considered first. sections 366 and 368 of the district municipalities act are the two sections having a bearing on this question. section 366 states that:no distraint shall be made, no suit shall be instituted and no prosecution .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //