Mall - Judgment Search Results

Maturi Mall and anr. Vs. Bhagaban Das Purna Mall and anr.

Court: Orissa

Reported in: AIR1950Ori189; 16(1950)CLT136

started on 19th August 1944 in which the judgment-debtor was described as Biseswarlal Maegturam Kishorilal, Firm, Proprietors Maturi Mall and Jogeswar, the present appellants. This execution case was also dismissed and the Miscellaneous case no. 161 of

Century 21 Malls Pvt Ltd Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.12071 OF2016[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.35577 OF2016]. CENTURY21MALLS PVT LTD Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. Leave...

Yash Vardhan Mall Vs. Tejash Doshi

Court: Supreme Court of India

APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos.19635-19636 of 2017 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil ) Nos.28643-28644 of 2017) YASH VARDHAN MALL .... Appellant Versus TEJASH DOSHI ….Respondent JUDGMENT L. NAGESWARA RAO, J.Leave granted. A Will was executed by Smt.

Bhura Dula Mall (Dead) by L.Rs. Vs. Basantibai and Another

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1994SC1243; 1995Supp(1)SCC36

Matched in: Parties Bhura Dula Mall (Dead) by L.Rs. Vs. Basantibai and Another

China Mall Vs. the State of West Bengal

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1973SC769; 1973CriLJ589; (1973)3SCC311

Matched in: Parties China Mall Vs. the State of West Bengal

Arjunlal Bhatt Mall Gothani and ors. Vs. Girish Chandra Dutta and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1973SC2256; (1973)2SCC197; 1973(5)LC736(SC)

Matched in: Parties Arjunlal Bhatt Mall Gothani and ors. Vs. Girish Chandra Dutta and anr.

Ghaio Mall and Sons Vs. the State of Delhi and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1959SC65; [1959]1SCR1424

one and stated that reasons why, according to him, the applications of two other applicants, including Messrs Gainda Mall Hem Raj (respondent No. 5), should be given the preference. In the penultimate paragraph of this letter of

Suraj Mall Mohta and Co. Vs. A.V. Visvanatha Sastri and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1954SC545; [1954]26ITR1(SC); [1955]1SCR448

commencement of the Constitution of India by reason of article 14 of the Constitution. 2. The petitioner, Suraj Mall Mohta & Co. Ltd., is a company registered under the Indian Companies Act. Suraj Mall Mohta is also

Todeti Mall Vs. B.Sammi Reddy Tahsildar Burghampaha

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY Contempt Case No.1770 of 2014 05-8-2015 Todeti Mallaiah Petitioner B.Sammi Reddy Tahsildar Burghampahad Mandal Burghampahad, Khammam District and others Respondents COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER: Mr. P.Vishnuvardhan

Yash Vardhan Mall Vs. Tejash Doshi

Court: Kolkata

JUSTICE SIDDHARTHA CHATTOPADHYAY APO No.359 of 2017 GA No.2552 of 2017 In PLA No.123 of 2016 YASH VARDHAN MALL -VERSUSTEJASH DOSHI For the Appellant: Mr S. P. Sarkar, Sr Adv., Mr Surojit N. Mitra, Sr Adv., Mr