Court : Chennai
..... in a primary residential zone, which is not permissible in law.". (ii). in the decision p.t.prabhakar and another vs. the member secretary, chennai metropolitan development authority, no.1, gandhi irwin road, chennai8and7others {2006 (5) ctc at page nos.449 and 450} and held that ".the object of tamil nadu town and country planning act, 1971 is to regulate development ..... to restore the play ground to its original position, within the time stipulated by this court. for appellants and for petitioner ... mr.m.ajmal khan, senior counsel for mr.r.gandhi for respondents in w.a.(md) no.738 of 2013 ... mr.c.selvaraj, spl.g.p for r.r.2 to 4 and 8 mr.r.murali for r.5 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... this would amount to payment towards the compensation out of public revenue. in this context, as already indicated by the learned additional advocate general and mr.r.gandhi, learned senior counsel for r-4, it must be pointed out that the same issue has been concisely discussed with clear findings in the previous litigation ..... prayer is hit by the principles of res judicata, learned additional advocate general pleaded for dismissal of the writ petitions by imposing exemplary costs.7. mr. r.gandhi, learned senior counsel appearing for the 4th respondent, supporting the arguments advanced by the learned additional advocate general, would argue with vigor and force for dismissal ..... . for petitioners in wps.23902 & 23903/07 : mr.v.ayyadurai for petitioner in wp.24197/2007 : mr.d.shivakumaran for r4 in all wps : mr.r.gandhi, senior counsel for mr.r.g.narendhiran for other respondents/state: mr.v.s.sethuraman, addl. advocate general, assisted by mr.s.v.duraisolaimalai, addl. govt. pleader .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... the writ petition.23. denying the averments contained in the counter affidavit filed by the respondents 2 and 3 and based on the averments in the reply affidavit, mr.r.gandhi, learned senior counsel for the petitioner submitted that the market value of the said land is more than rs.3 crores. since the lands are abutting erode-karur highways road ..... .275/4, 278/3, 278/8 and 278/9, solakalipalayam, chenna sumuthram village, kodumudi taluk, erode district. for petitioner : mr.r.gandhi, sr. counsel for m/s.v.s.sivasundaram for respondents : mr.jayesh b dolia order mr.r.gandhi, learned senior counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the owner of lands in survey nos.275/4, 278/3 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: This Criminal Referred Case Is Registered As Required Under Section 366 Cr.P.C. For Confirmation Of Death Sentence Awarded To Accused No.10 Syed Mohammed Ibrahim S/O Late Mohammed Ismail By The Xxxiv Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge and Presiding Oficer, Spl. Court, Central Prison Premises, Bangalore By Judgment Of Conviction Dated 21/29-11-2008 In Sc No.696 Of 2005. This Criminal Appeal Is Filed Under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C By The Advocate For The Appellant Praying To Set Aside The Judgment And Order Of Convictions Dated 21.11.2008 And Sentences Dated 29.11.2008 Passed In S.C.No.696/2005, On The File Of 34th Addl. City Civil And Session Judge And P.O Spl.Court For The Trial Of Church Bomb Blast Cases, Central Prison Premises, Bangalore.) 1. A series of bomb blasts at Churches situate at various places rocked the State of Karnataka in the year 2000 attempting to disturb the normal tranquility of the civilized society and the peace loving people of Karnataka who believe in co...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Guwahati
..... ) and article 324(6), the power to nominate a member of the anglo-indian community to the assembly in certain situations (article 333), the power to authorise the use of hindi in proceedings in the high court [article 348(2)], are illustrative of the functions of the governor, qua the governor. 36. the governor shall act with aid and advice of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... 1948, the employees state insurance act, 1948, the employees provident funds and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952, as well as (to the extent possible) the mahatma gandhi national rural employment guarantee act, 2005.8. the ministry of labour and employment should also consider whether projects of the government of india in the railways, ..... social audit in respect of some other schemes (for example, the report of the working group on developing social audit standards with reference to the mahatma gandhi national rural employment guarantee act, 2005) and these guidelines can be adapted mutatis mutandis for carrying out a social audit in respect of the implementation ..... advert to some statutory benefits. for example, it is stated that a large number of construction workers would be entitled to the benefit of the mahatma gandhi national rural employment guarantee scheme, since most of the works undertaken through the scheme, barring a few relating to forestry, horticulture, etc. fall within .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... 29.pdf 56 statement of shri v.i. muniswamy pillai, constituent assembly debates (november 29, 1948) press, new delhi, available of india 1948) 68 not only mahatma gandhi, but also great men and philosophers of this ancient land, swami vivekananda, raja ram mohan roy, rabindranath tagore and others, who led a relentless struggle against this ..... is a scheduled class man will feel that he has been elevated in society and has now got a place in society 56 dr. monomohan das, quotes mahatma gandhi while undeniably accepting the meaning of untouchability as intended under the constitution: gandhiji said i do not want to be reborn, but if i am reborn, ..... the statutory reform, and not the other way about. the social reform was spearheaded by great religious as well as national leaders like swami 67 vivekananda and mahatma gandhi. the reforms were based upon societal morality, much before constitutional morality came into place. 14.4. article 11 of the draft constitution corresponds to article 17 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... whether insertion of explanation - 2 to section 3(1) of the act by the impugned amendment has removed the basis of the judgment of this court in mahesh gandhi?. (mahesh gandhi vs. deputy commissioner for transport, belgaum [2005(5) klj362)?.3. what order?.13. it is not in dispute that the vehicles of the respondents have all been ..... in respect of motor vehicles registered outside karnataka and which are within the state for a period exceeding thirty days. when the judgment of this court in mahesh gandhi has categorically ruled that registration of a vehicle coming from outside the state, under section 47 of mv act, 1988, is a condition precedent for the levy of ..... condition precedent, which is evident from the explanation-1 and the note appended thereto, which has also been the interpretation by this court in the case of mahesh gandhi, which means that a vehicle registered outside the state of karnataka plying within the state has to -:116. :- be registered if it remains within the state for .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE10h DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2015 BEFORE: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA BETWEEN: W.P. No.29314/2002 (LR) 1.2. KALAGONDADHA BASAVANNAPPA, ADOPTED SON OF EERAPPA, AGE:38. YEARS, OCC.: AGRICULTURIST, R/O BATHIKOPPA, TQ: HIREKERUR, DIST.: HAVERI. BASAVANNEPPA SHIVAMURTHAPPA NANDIGAVI, DECEASED BY LRS. 2(A). SMT. ANNAPURNA W/O BASAVANNEPPA NADIGAVI, AGE:70. YEARS, OCC.: HOUSEHOLD WORK. 2(B). SHRI KARIYAPPA S/O BASAVANNEPPA NADIGAVI, AGE:48. YEARS, OCC.: AGRICULTURE, 2(C). SHRI JAYAPPA S/O BASAVANNEPPA NADIGAVI, AGE:46. YEARS, OCC.: AGRICULTURE. 2(D). SMT. GADIGEVVA W/O IRAPPE HALLER, AGE:42. YEARS, OCC.: HOUSEHOLD WORK. ALL ARE RESIDENT OF GUDDADA BEVIN HALLI, TQ: RANNEBENNUR, DIST.: HAVERI. (BY SRI. LAXMAN T. MANTAGANI, ADVOCATE FOR PETITIONER NO.1, SRI DINESH M. KULKARNI, ADVOCATE FOR PETITIONER NO.2(A-D) - PETITIONERS2AND:1. 2.3. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE GOVT., REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANASOUDA, BANGALORE. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... petitioners, they argued that none of the members of the nclt or the nclat had been appointed contrary to the judgments of this court in union of india v. r. gandhi, president, madras bar association (2010) 11 scc1[ madras bar association (i) ]. and madras bar association (iii) (supra). they referred to affidavits filed before this court to show that all such .....
Tag this Judgment!