Court : Mumbai Nagpur
oral judgment: (anoop v. mohta, j.) 1. rule, returnable forthwith. heard finally by consent of the learned counsel for the parties. 2. the petitioner was rusticated therefore, this petition. mahatma gandhi antarrashtriya hindi vishwavidyalaya act, 1996 (for short the said act ) provides for dispute settlement mechanism in sections 32, 33 and 34 for the students in disciplinary cases which are reproduced as under: .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 149(2008)DLT626
..... other literature in various subjects of social sciences in hindi medium. the ugc accordingly constituted a five member committee headed by professor g. gopinathan of mahatma gandhi antrrashtriya hindi vishwavidyalaya. the committee examined the objects underlying the establishment of the directorate of hindi medium implementation, its functions and the difficulties faced in ..... by the directorate clearly supported the publication of basic textbooks in emerging areas by either asking the scholars to write original text books in hindi or to translate the books from english and other indian foreign languages. the relevant portion of the recommendation, in this regard, was as ..... and perused the record. there are two distinct facets of the controversy raised in this writ petition, one relating to the introduction of hindi medium of instructions for different courses and the other relating to the infrastructure including literature needed for imparting such instructions. from the affidavits placed .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
..... to mr. shyam m. ruia (at the address of mr. shyam m. ruia given above) with a copy to ms. lira goswami, associated law advisers, 612 antriksh bhawan, 22 kasturba gandhi marg, new delhi-110 001, india (advocate for "mgg") at fax number (91)(11)3352231 or (91)(11)3352226.10. the parties agree that "mgg" do hereby full and irrevocable .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : 1996IVAD(SC)137; AIR1996SC1864; JT1996(4)SC379; 1996(3)SCALE640; (1996)5SCC125; [1996]Supp1SCR442
..... of the act exclude woman tribals from inheritance to the khuntkutti raiyati rights solely on the basis of sex and confine succession and inheritance among male descendants only. in maneka gandhi v. union of india, : [1978]2scr621 , this court held that reasonableness is an essential element of equality; non-arbitrariness pervades article 14. the court must consider the direct and inevitable ..... held that the prohibition under article 14 is to secure all persons against arbitrary laws as well as arbitrary application of laws. it applies to procedural and substantive law. menaka gandhi v. union of india, : [1978]2scr621 , reiterates its creed on grounds of justice, equity and fairness lest law becomes void, oppressive, unjust and unfair.19. eugine smith in his indian .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2009(1)ALT708
ORDERN.V. Ramana, J.Brief Case of the Petitioners1. One Shri Mohd. Amjad Ali Khan, was the owner of agricultural land in an extent of Ac. 481.61 situate in Sy. Nos. 270, 284 to 300, 302, 304, 306, 307 and 311 to 317, Bachupalli village, Medchal Taluq, Ranga Reddy District. He died in the year 1950. After his death, his wife, namely Smt. Rabia Begum, his two sons, namely Ahsan Ali Khan and Akram Ali Khan, and his two daughters, namely Tahera Yousuf Kadri and Qudsia Sajjad, the petitioners herein succeeded to his property, and since then they were in enjoyment and possession thereof.2. While so, the A.P. Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Land Reforms Act') came into force w.e.f. 01.01.1975. The petitioners state that their mother, their two brothers and themselves, filed declarations separately under Section 8(1) of the Land Reforms Act, in respect of an extent of Ac. 481.697 cents of land in the above mentioned survey numbers, bef...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR2005SC186; [2005]126CompCas356(SC); 2004(5)CTC376; JT2004(9)SC379; 2004(9)SCALE215; (2005)1SCC496
..... that the right to personal liberty also means the life free from encroachments unsustainable in law and such right flowing from article 21 of the constitution.57. in smt. maneka gandhi v. union of india and anr., : [1978]2scr621 - a 7-judges bench decision, p.n. bhagwati, j. (as his lordship then was) held that the expression 'personal liberty' in article .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jammu and Kashmir
Reported in : AIR2003J& K83,2003(1)JKJ35
..... vs state of jammu & kashmir, the petitioner, born on 18th november, 1969 is daughter of a permanent resident of the state of jammu & kashmir. she graduated from government woman college, gandhi nagar, jammu and thereafter passed post graduation course from the university of jammu. she was appointed as adhoc lecturer in chemistry in govt. women college, parade, jammu and then in ..... govt. women college, gandhi nagar, jammu. thereafter the petitioner was appointed as a teacher on regular basis in the education department till she was appointed as research assistant on 05-07-1993. the post .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Swatanter Kumar, J.1. By this order we will deal with and dispose of, the recommendations made by the Central Empowered Committee (for short, "CEC") in its report dated 20th April, 2012. Since we have heard the affected parties, the petitioners and the learned Amicus Curiae, we shall summarize the contentions of the learned counsel for the respective parties. The learned counsel appearing for the affected parties contended :a. CEC has submitted its report without providing them an opportunity of being heard.b. CEC has exceeded its jurisdiction and enlarged the scope of the enquiry beyond the reference made by the Court. Thus, the Court should not accept any of the recommendations made by the CEC.c. In relation to the alleged irregularities and illegalities pointed out in the report of the CEC, even where criminality is involved or criminal offences are suspected, the matters are sub judice before the Court of competent jurisdiction. Thus, this Court should not pass any orders for trans...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Reported in : AIR1998Bom264; 1998(1)ALLMR587; 1998(4)BomCR83; II(1998)DMC271; 1998(1)MhLj618
ORDERV.P. Tipnis, J.1. This appeal, which was admitted by the 1st Court on 29th July 1997, was taken up for hearing as it was stated on behalf of the appellant that the order is such that it is impossible for him to comply with and will result into grave hardship to the appellant-husband.2. The order impugned is an ad-interim order passed by the learned Single Judge in a Notice of Motion taken out in a suit filed by the wife under section 18 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') for maintenance for herself and her minor daughter. The learned Judge by the impugned order dated 17th July 1997 awarded an ad-interim maintenance of Rs. 7,500/- per month commencing from July 1997. The amount, the learned Judge clarified would include Rs. 1,600/- which the defendant-husband is prepared to pay for the maintenance of the child.3. Mr. Naphade, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant-husband, read out the impugned order and raised three points....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 1998(1)ALD639
..... institute ofscience & tech.hyderabad rr dist. (covereddivision)4.nimra college of engg. andtech.vijayawada, krishna district(covered division)5.indira seva sadan college ofeng. & tech.hyderabad, rr dist (covereddivision)6.mahatma gandhi institute oftech.gandipet, r.r. dist (covereddivision)7.vignan engineering collegeguntur district (covereddivision)8.kamala institute of tech. andscience.karimnagar dist.9.jyotishmith institute of tech. & science.karimnagar dist.it ..... of list iii. in the gujarat university, ahmedabad v. krishna ranganath mudholkar, : air1963sc703 , the supreme court observed thus:'the central question was whether the gujarat university could impose gujarati or hindi as the exclusive media of instruction and examination and whether state legislation authorising the gujarat university to impose such media was constitutionally valid in view of entry 66. as it .....
Tag this Judgment!