Court : Gujarat
Reported in : (2004)1GLR893
..... party is not enough for transfer of a case from one court to another. he relied on the decision of the supreme court in the case of mrs. maneka sanjay gandhi & anr. v. miss rani jethmalani reported in (1979) 4 s.c.c. 167. the relevant portion is extracted as under :-'2. assurance of a fair trial is the first imperative .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : AIR2004Guj285
..... possession thereof, could not be handed over then at the most, the allottee would be entitled to refund the amount with reasonable rate of interest.23. mr. gandhi has further submitted that the respondents have suppressed from this court as well as from the trial court regarding the suit filed by or against them. necessary details ..... appellant in para 21 (1) of the application. precisely for this reason, the present appeal from order was filed before this court.14. mr. m.b. gandhi has further submitted that there was a factual typographical error in mentioning the final plot no.834 in para 21 (2) of the injunction application and necessary amendment was ..... matter, all these civil applications as well as appeal from order are placed for final hearing.10. before hearing of appeal from order is started, mr. m.b. gandhi with mr. p.m. bhatt, learned advocates appearing for the appellant - original plaintiff submitted that since the opponents have committed breach of injunction of this court, c.a .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : (2002)3GLR92
H.K. Rathod, J.1. In Special Civil Application No.6175/1999, this Court has heard Mr.S.B.Pandit, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitoner - Gujarat Housing Board and Mr.R.M.Chauhan, learned AGP appearing on behalf of the respondent No.5 so also Mr.B.S.Patel, learned advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 4.This Court has also heard Mr.R.M.Chauhan, learned AGP appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr.B.S.Patel, learned advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 3 in Special Civil Application No.5274/1999.2. So far as Special Civil Application No.6175/1999 is concerned, this Court has issued RULE on 20th August, 1999 and also issued notice as to interim relief returnable on 16th September, 1999. However, during the interim period, by way of ad-interim relief upto 16th Sept.,1999 has stayed the operation and implementation of the impugned order at Annexure-A dated 13th January, 1999, subject to conditions that the petitioner shall not allot, dispose of or otherwise, deal with the propert...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : (2001)ILLJ1296Guj
..... fundamental rights. the management was directed to provide health insurance during service and at least 15 years after retirement and periodical tests protecting the health of the workmen. xxxxxxxx '46. mahatma gandhi, the father of the nation, in his book socialism of my concept, has said thus : 'to a people finishing and idle, the only acceptable form in which god can dare .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : (2009)3GLR1982
..... chaube, who had asked him to be panch. smt. krishna chaube - p.w. 2 who otherwise resides at gandhinagar stated that she had reached to the statue of mahatma gandhi from gandhinagar travelling via ashram road and the panch who is a regular walker at drive-in is said to have been requested by p.w. 3-mr. tomar. the ..... at exh. 83, which was recorded for about 2 to 3 hours. the statement was recorded in gujarati language and mrs. krishna chaube was asking the questions in hindi and one sepoy rakesh dantani was translating in gujarati language and was recording the statement. at this juncture, it must be noted that, no scratch has been made by ..... the sample, according to this witness, had been prepared after crushing the substance and making it homogeneous. he stated that the accused were read out the panchnama in hindi language as both the panchas were more comfortable in that language. this witness is specific about his having left the place after the panchnama and no other documents having .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : [1996]87CompCas705(Guj)
..... count. here we are not concerned with the question which does not affect the parties before the court.16. likewise, in the case of dhartipakar madan lal agarwal v. rajiv gandhi, : [1987]3scr369 , the court was dealing with an appeal arising from an election petition under the representation of the people act. the question about the validity of the election concerned .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : (2003)4GLR554
H.K. Rathod, J. 1. These petitions have been filed by the petitioner State of Gujarat challenging two common awards passed by the Labour Court, Surat under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.2. Heard Mr. A.D. Oza for the petitioners in this group of petitions. The Labour Court, Surat has passed two common award dated 13th June, 2002 one in Reference (LCS) No. 47 of 1999 to 51 of 1999, 15 of 1999 to 84 of 1999, 146 of 1999 to 151 of 1999, 186 of 1999 to 361 of 1999. The Labour Court, Surat has also passed second common award of the same date in Reference No. 205 of 1995 to 622 of 1995. In both the common awards, the labour court, Surat has granted the same and similar benefits as well as issued some similar directions in favour of the respondent workmen. The labour court, Surat has directed the second party respondent workmen to submit detailed residential address, ration card and the election card or any other Government documents along with the certificate of birth date to the E...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : [1999]97CompCas301(Guj); (1998)2GLR1436
M. S. Shah, J. 1. This appeal is filed by the original plaintiff against the interlocutory order dated September 11, 1997, passed by the City Civil Court, Ahmedabad, rejecting the notice of motion filed by the appellant-plaintiff in Civil Suit No. 3533 of 1997. In a nutshell : The subject-matter of the present suit is transfer of 3,81,000 equity shares in defendant No. 1 - a public limited company - Gujarat Gas Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'the company' or as 'Gujarat Gas') engaged in the supply and distribution of natural gas to domestic and industrial consumers in the State of Gujarat. 2. The appellant-plaintiff, which is a company engaged in manufacturing textiles and chemicals, is a shareholder in Gujarat Gas with 49,95,325 shares amounting to about 39 per cent. of the shareholding. In all 5,00,000 shares amounting to 3.87 per cent. of the total equity capital were sold by the plaintiff to defendant No. 2, a foreign institutional investor (FII), in October, 1993, and...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : [2007]138CompCas204(Guj); [2007]79SCL47(Guj)
R.S. Garg, J.1. This judgement shall dispose of Company Petition Nos. 9 and 10 of 2006. 2. Company Petition No. 10 of 2006 has been filed under Sections 78, 100, 391 and 393 of the Companies Act, 1956 ('the Act' for short) by the Company named Core Healthcare Limited, a company incorporated under the Act in the matter of a composite Scheme of Arrangement in the nature of compromise with the lenders and reconstruction, reorganisation of capital and demerger between Core Healthcare Limited and Nirma Limited and their respective shareholders. The petitioner-Company has prayed for the following reliefs:(a) The Modified Composite Scheme of Arrangement referred to in para-15 of this petition and being Annex. with this petition hereto, be sanctioned by this Hon'ble Court so as to be binding on all Equity Shareholders, Class 'A' Lenders and Class 'B' Lenders of the Petitioner Company and on the Petitioner Company;(b) That the Petitioner Company do within 30 days from the date of sealing of the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : (2001)1GLR603
..... legal aid boards or authorities or involvement of law students and law schools in the legal aid. it must be remembered that the whole tenure of law developments, since maneka gandhi's case, does not support the carving out of any exception on any ground for providing free legal aid to the indigent, the illiterate and the ignorant and such legal ..... has been elevated on a very high pedestal in india. in will, also, be interesting to refer the judicial creativity and activism of the hon'ble apex court manifestedin maneka gandhi v. union of india, air 1978 sc 597. it will be heartening to find that the highest court of the land has given this landmark decision in which the following .....
Tag this Judgment!