Court : Supreme Court of India
..... only stifle investments in innovative content but also continue to restrict incumbent channels whose rates were frozen in 2003-2004 from realizing their real value. mass genre general entertainment (hindi & regional) movies regional) (hindi & sports proposed price cap (rs.) 12.00 10.00 18.00 these caps should be subject to automatic annual revision, basis inflation. while answering whether broadcasters should offer .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... value of rs 50 cr. it further proves that the difference between the value of property and the price at which it was transferred to mr. paramjit gandhi was paid in cash out of cash amount received in amrapali group by booking of bogus expenditure and selling the flats undervalued. opinion based on the facts stated ..... buyer agreement is rs 3.19 cr.32. m/s surbhaee advertising private limited (immovable property-a3a, maharani bagh, new delhi) (i) mr. paramjit gandhi, mr. gagandeep gandhi & ms. jasmine gandhi are the directors of the company m/s surbhaee advertising private limited. the shares of m/s surbhaee advertising private limited were purchased by mr. paramjeet ..... kumar sharma is residing in the same house against which no rent deed is agreed between mr. anil kumar sharma & mr. paramjit gandhi (surbhaee advertising private limited) (iv) when asked to mr. paramjit gandhi who resides in ghaziabad that why he purchased the property in new delhi 4-5 years back, he replied that he wanted to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... in the evidence. the learned trial judge has observed that the evidence of vinod sahani is that the incident took place at a distance of about 100 ft from the gandhi statute, where the meeting was held. what he wanted to convey was that hence there must have been light at the place of crl.a.no.1284/2015 page 195 ..... this statement, the high court observed that the accused had stated that he had kept them (drums) there . we have perused the original record of the statement which is in hindi, and we are of opinion that by no stretching of the words this statement can be so read or construed as has been done by the high court. the copy ..... entry in the 13. daily diary a in regard to rukka ex. pw1/a. the entry on being translated into english reads as follows:-" at this time a writing in hindi written and signed by jagbir singh, s.i. containing the statement of s. balak singh, s/o lachhman singh, r/o qr. no.8b, jangpura extension, has been received at .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % CRL.REF.No.1/2016 Reserved on :28. h February 2017 Date of decision :17. h October 2017 DAYAWATI Through: Mr. Gautam Pal, Adv. for the ........ Petitioner versus complainant YOGESH KUMAR GOSAIN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, Adv. for the respondent Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv., Ms. Veena Ralli alongwith Mr. Ravin Kapur and Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Advs. as Amici Curiae. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 The legal permissibility of referring a complaint cases under Section 138 of the NI Act for amicable settlement through mediation; procedure to be followed upon settlement and the legal implications of breach of the mediation settlement is the subject matter of this judgment. Shri Bharat Chugh, as the concerned Metropolitan Crl.Ref.No.1/2016 Page 1 of 89 Magistrate (NI Act) Central - 01/THC/ Delhi, when seized of Complaint Case Nos.519662/2016 and 5...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... india to invoke arbitration against gmr energy. relying upon the decisions reported as 2010 (5) scc306indowind energy ltd. vs. wescare (india) ltd., 2017 scconline del 8345 sudhir gopi vs. indira gandhi national open university and 2014 (9) scc407balwant rai saluja & anr. vs. air india ltd. & ors. it is contended that the principle of alter ego as being sought to be invoked .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... effect is the judgment of the apex court in vinitec electronics private limited (supra) more particularly paragraphs 11 and 12.65. the apex court in the case of mahatma gandhi 2007 (supra) ruled that the right of the purchaser to recover from the guarantor, the guaranteed amount shall not be effected or suspended by reasons of the fact ..... the conditions in the loi, but between the bank and the appellant the decision of the appellant as to the breach is absolute and binding. in the case of mahatma gandhi sahakra sakkare karkhane (supra) the apex court had laid down that a person in whose favour the o.m.p.(i) (comm.) 234/2019 page 13 of 66 ..... of law that a case of invocation of bg must be decided without advertence to the contract. reliance is placed on the judgments of the apex court as follows : (a) mahatma gandhi sahakra sakkare karkhane vs. national heavy engg. coop. ltd. and anr. (2007) 6 scc470 (b) gujarat maritime board vs. l&t infrastructure development projects ltd. & ors., (2016) .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... be lawfully be inflicted upon him for what the court has determined to be an offence. he has even invoked the father of the nation, mahatma gandhi s statement, which was made by mahatma gandhi at the conclusion of the trial against him.90. the court, from the very beginning, was desirous of giving quietus to this matter. directly or ..... an apology for the tweets that expressed what was and continues to be my bonafide belief. therefore, i can only humbly paraphrase what the father of the nation mahatma gandhi had said in his trial: i do not ask for mercy. i do not appeal to magnanimity. i am here, therefore, to cheerfully submit to any penalty ..... and, therefore, it would attract the legal restrictions with far greater stringency and any infraction would invite more severe punishment. 61. in state of maharashtra v. rajendra jawanmal gandhi, (1997) 8 scc386 the concept of trial by press, electronic media and public agitation was considered and the court held thus: 37. we agree with the high .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2965 OF2022Manik Majumder and Others Appellants Versus Dipak Kumar Saha (Dead) through Lrs. & Others Respondents JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 05.04.2018 passed by the High Court of Tripura at Agarthala in Regular Second Appeal No.01/2005, by which the High Court has allowed the said appeal preferred by the original plaintiffs and has decreed the suit by quashing and setting aside the concurrent findings recorded by both the courts below, the original defendants have preferred the present appeal. 12. The facts leading to the present appeal in a nutshell are as under: That one Braja Mohan Dey was the owner and in possession of Schedule A property. He was alleged to have taken a loan of Rs. 10,000/- from his tenant, namely, Dhirendra Chandra Saha, original plaintiff No.2. The original owner, Braja Mohan Dey went to East Pakistan. I...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... state action . this view was further elaborated and affirmed in d.s. nakara v. union of india [(1983) 1 scc305:1983. scc (l&s) 145 : (1983) upsc263: air1983sc130. in maneka gandhi v. union of india [ (1978) 2 scr621: (1978) 1 scc248: air1978sc597 it was observed that article 14 strikes at arbitrariness in state action and ensures fairness and equality of treatment .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... speech lifted.64. humour and disabilities are viewed as uneasy companions. this is primarily because of the historical use of humour to mock disability, make jokes at the 93 maneka gandhi (supra), indibly creative (supra) [22, 28]. 94 indibly creative private limited v. government of west bengal 2020 12 scc436 [23]. 31 part f expense of persons with disabilities and to ..... and wide participation from across the 89 sakal papers (p) ltd v. union of india (1962) 3 scr842[justice mudholkar, 41].. 90 s rangrajan (supra) [36, 40-43].. 91 maneka gandhi v. union of india, (1978) 1 scc248[bhagwati j, 29].. 92 prakash jha v. union of india (2011) 8 scc372[8, 22-27].. 30 part f social spectrum.93 unfortunately .....
Tag this Judgment!