Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: mahatma gandhi antarrashtriya hindi vishwavidyalaya act 1996 section 6 jurisdiction Page 6 of about 1,977 results (0.398 seconds)

K.T. Plantation Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... inflicted on a man's property was an amputation of his personal liberty. therefore, land reform law, if unreasonable, violates article 21 as expansively construed in maneka gandhi. the dichotomy between personal liberty, in article 21, and proprietary status, in articles 31 and 19 is plain, whatever philosophical justification or pragmatic realisation it may ..... examining the constitutional validity of article 31a, had occasion to consider the scope of article 21 in the light of the judgment of this court in maneka gandhi's case (supra). dealing with the contention that deprivation of property amounts to violation of the right guaranteed under article 21 of the constitution of india, ..... the judgments of this court in kavalappara kottarathil kochuni's case (supra), e.p royappa v. state of tamil nadu & another (1974) 4 scr 3; maneka gandhi v. union of india & another 1978 (1) scc 248; ramana dayaram shetty v. international airport authority of india & others (1979) 3 scc 489; .....

Smt. Selvi and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... true, our constitution has no `due process' clause or the viii amendment; but, in this branch of law, after cooper : (1970) 1 scc 248 and maneka gandhi : (1978) 1 scc 248 the consequence is the same. for what is punitively outrageous, scandalizingly unusual or cruel and rehabilitatively counter-productive, is unarguably unreasonable and arbitrary ..... and 19, thereby requiring the state to demonstrate the `reasonableness' of placing such restrictions on `personal liberty' [this approach was later endorsed by bhagwati, j. in maneka gandhi v. union of india : air 1978 sc 597, see p. 622]. subba rao, j. held that the right to privacy `is an essential ingredient of personal ..... .82. in the indian context, article 20(3) should be construed with due regard for the inter-relationship between rights, since this approach was recognised in maneka gandhi's case, (1978) 1 scc 248. hence, we must examine the `right against self-incrimination' in respect of its relationship with the multiple dimensions of ` .....

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon. Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi , B ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... upon the existence of enacted law. after three decades, the supreme court overruled its previous decision in a.k. gopalan and held in its landmark judgment in maneka gandhi v. union of india that the procedure contemplated by article 21 must answer the test of reasonableness.the court further held that the procedure should also be in conformity ..... superintendent of police inapril 1985. the rank of superintendent was equivalent to the rank ofdeputy commissioner of police (dcp) in greater bombay. he is conversantand well versed with english, hindi, marathi and punjabi languages andaccording to him, he is able to speak, read and write the said fourlanguages. since january 1993, he was posted as dcp, zone ix, bombay ..... i did not make any complaint t the court as i was with the accused persons in jail and i was afraid of them."para 91 " .i sign in hindi and english as per my choice. i can read write and understand english. it is true that his application was written by me and is signed by me and .....

Sneh Gupta Vs. Devi Sarup and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2009(2)AWC1552(SC); 2010(1)MhLJ293(SC); (2009)6SCC194; 2009(2)JT641.

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Interpretation of Order XXIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure is involved in this appeal. It arises out of a judgment and order dated 13.9.2006 passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana setting aside an order dated 29.9.2005 passed by the Additional District Judge, Jagadhari whereby and whereunder the terms of settlement entered into by way of an agreement dated 25.4.1998 between some of the parties hereto were declared illegal as also null and void.3. Indisputably, two suits were filed being Suit No. 185 of 1989 and Suit No. 303 of 1992 on 20.11.1989 and 21.3.1992 before the Additional Civil Judge, Jagadhari, Haryana and Senior Division Bench and before the Civil Judge, Jagadhari, Haryana, respectively.In the said suits, inter alia, the question as regards an order of mutation carried out in the Revenue records pursuant to or in furtherance of a transfer made by one Raghuvir Singh in favour of his wife and son stat...

Maqbool Fida HusaIn Vs. Raj Kumar Pandey

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2008CriLJ4107

Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J.1. Pablo Picasso, a renowned artist said, 'Art is never chaste. It ought to be forbidden to ignorant innocents, never allowed into contact with those not sufficiently prepared. Yes, art is dangerous. Where it is chaste, it is not art.'2. Art, to every artist, is a vehicle for personal expression. An aesthetic work of art has the vigour to connect to an individual sensory, emotionally, mentally and spiritually. With a 5000-year-old culture, Indian Art has been rich in its tapestry of ancient heritage right from the medieval times to the contemporary art adorned today with each painting having a story to narrate.3. Ancient Indian art has been never devoid of eroticism where sex worship and graphical representation of the union between man and woman has been a recurring feature.1 The sculpture on the earliest temples of 'Mithuna' image or the erotic couple in Bhubeneshwar, Konarak and Puri in Orissa (150-1250 AD); Khajuraho in Madhya Pradesh (900-1050 AD); Limbojimat...

Justice P.D. Dinakaran Vs. Hon'Ble Judges Inquiry Committee

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... had been contravened the court has to decide whether the observance of that rule was necessary for a just decision on the facts of that case. (emphasis supplied) in maneka gandhi v. union of india (supra), a larger bench of seven judges considered whether passport of the petitioner could be impounded without giving her notice and opportunity of hearing. bhagwati, j ..... he cannot be deprived of that right by invoking the doctrine of waiver. in support of his arguments, shri amarendra sharan relied upon the judgments of this court in maneka gandhi v. union of india (1978)1scc248, m.h. hoskot v. state of maharashtra (1978)3scc544, ranjit thakur v. union of india (1987)4scc611, triveniben v. state of gujarat (1989)1scc678 .....

Ms Delhi Airtech Services Pvt. and anr Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... payment. therefore, the eminent domain concept is subject to the aforesaid statutory condition and must be read subject to due process concept introduced in our constitutional law in maneka gandhi (supra). if i read, section 17(3a) as i must, consistently with the constitutional doctrine of due process as articulated in the expression `authority of law' under ..... to the persons interested and entitled thereto. this is the clear mandate of law. 43. in view of the principles enunciated in r.c. cooper (supra) and maneka gandhi (supra), reasonableness in law has to be its implicit content. here no challenge to the reasonableness of section 17 (3a) is either argued or considered by this court ..... said act must be tested on the anvil of the broad interpretation of fundamental rights given by this court. in view of the decision of this court in maneka gandhi v. union of india & another - (1978) 1 scc 248, the interpretation of part iii rights namely rights under article 14, 19 and 21 given therein .....

State of Kerala and anr. Vs. Peoples Union for Civil Liberties, Kerala ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2009(9)SC573; 2009(10)SCALE25; (2009)8SCC46

..... the area greener. large dams can also become instruments in improving the environment, as has been the case in western rajasthan, which transformed into a green area because of indira gandhi canal which draws water from bhakra nangal dam. this project not only allows the farmers to grow crops in deserts but also checks the spread of thar desert in the .....

Shobhnaben D/O Pyarelal Kanojia Vs. Devendra Omprakashbhai Oberoi

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2004)1GLR893

..... party is not enough for transfer of a case from one court to another. he relied on the decision of the supreme court in the case of mrs. maneka sanjay gandhi & anr. v. miss rani jethmalani reported in (1979) 4 s.c.c. 167. the relevant portion is extracted as under :-'2. assurance of a fair trial is the first imperative .....

Posani Subbaiah Vs. Doppalalpudi Chilakamma and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2004(2)ALD370; 2004(2)ALT475

P.S. Narayana, J.1. The unsuccessful plaintiff in O.S. No. 110/73 on the file of Additional Subordinate Judge, Guntur, is the appellant. 2. The suit was instituted for cancellation and setting aside the decree in O.S. No. 45/64 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Guntur, which was confirmed by the Judgment and decree in A.S. No. 281/69, dated 25-6-1973 by the High Court, as not binding on the plaintiff and the 8th defendant in the suit and for possession of the plaint schedule property from the defendants, except the 8th defendant and for rendition of accounts as to the realization of profits from the schedule property from 29-10-1973 till date of delivery and for costs of the suit from the defendants, except the 8th defendant. 3. The respective pleadings of the parties are no doubt very elaborate. But however, since several factual details had been narrated in the respective pleadings, it will be appropriate to deal with the respective pleadings at the first instance. 4. The plaintiff h...