Mahal - Judgment Search Results

Holya Lasha Mahale and anr. Vs. Raghunath Holya Mahale

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2007(1)BomCR506; 2006(44)MhLj80

S.B. Mhase, J.1. Heard. Rule returnable forthwith with the consent of both parties.2. The petitioner is the original defendant from Regular Civil Suit No. 8 of 1997 decided by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Satana, District...

Jai Mahal Hotels Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Rajkumar Devraj and Ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.7914 OF2015(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NO.4384 OF2013 JAI MAHAL HOTELS PVT. LTD. … APPELLANT VERSUS RAJKUMAR DEVRAJ & ORS. … RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.7915 OF2015(ARISING OUT

Kulmeet Kaur Mahal and ors Vs. State of Punjab and ors

Court: Supreme Court of India

INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.7940 OF 201.(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO.25931 OF 2013.Dr. Kulmeet Kaur Mahal & Ors. ... Appellants Versus State of Punjab & Ors. ... Respondents JUDGMENT K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.1. Leave granted.2.

Jal Mahal Resorts P.Ltd. Vs. K.P.Sharma and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.4912 OF2014(Arising out of SLP (Civil) 17701/2012) Jal Mahal Resorts P. Ltd. ..Appellant Versus K.P. Sharma & Ors. ..Respondents With CIVIL APPEAL NO.4913 OF2014(Arising out of SLP

Raju Pandurang Mahale Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2004SC1677; 2004CriLJ1441; JT2004(2)SC425; 2004(2)SCALE408; (2004)4SCC371; 2004(2)LC876(SC)

S. Kopekar.2. Four accused persons faced trial. The appellants before the High Court were present appellant Raju Pandurang Mahale (A-1), Gautam (A-2), Pankaj (A-3) and Rajesh S. Kopekar (A-4). A-1 to A-4 were convicted for offences punishable

Shri Lal Mahal Ltd Vs. Progetto Grano Spa

Court: Supreme Court of India

OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5085 OF 201.(Arising out of SLP(C) No.13721 of 2012) Shri Lal Mahal Ltd. ……. Appellant Vs. Progetto Grano Spa ……Respondent JUDGMENT R.M. LODHA, J.Leave granted.2. The question for consideration in

Krishna Ram Mahale (Dead), by His Lrs. Vs. Mrs. Shobha Venkat Rao

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1989SC2097; (1989)91BOMLR302; JT1989(3)SC489; 1989MPLJ767(SC); 1989(2)SCALE424; (1989)4SCC131; 1990(1)LC71(SC)

Kania, J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment of a Division Bench of the High Court of Bombay in First Appeal No. 283 of 1969 by special leave granted by this Court under Article 136...

Damodar Balwant Mahale Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1987Supp(1)SCC264

E.S. Venkataramiah and; K.N. Singh, JJ.1. Special leave granted.2. We have heard the appeal. Admittedly two bits of land belonging to the appellant - Ghat No. 9 measuring 3 acres 22 guntas and Ghat No. 86...

Uttam Namdeo Mahale Vs. Vithal Deo and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1997SC2695; 1997(4)ALLMR(SC)447; JT1997(5)SC632; 1997(4)SCALE337; (1997)6SCC73; [1997]Supp1SCR257; 1997(2)LC303(SC)

1. Leave granted.2. This appeal has been filed against the order of the High Court of Bombay, made on January 20, 1997 in Writ Petition 6182 of 1996.3.The admitted position is that the respondent No. 1...

P.S. Mahal and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1984SC1291; 1984LabIC1176; (1984)IILLJ282SC; 1984(1)SCALE949; (1984)4SCC545; [1984]3SCR847; 1984(2)SLJ197(SC)

Matched in: Parties P.S. Mahal and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.