Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Mag - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 25 2026

M/S Mag Filters and Equipments Pvt Ltd vs M/S Three Aces Global Logist ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-25-2026

COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 25th March, 2026 + CM(M) 1898/2024 & CM APPL. 9660/2024M/S MAG FILTERS AND EQUIPMENTS PVT LTD.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Krish Kalra, Adv. (through VC)versusM/S THREE ACES GLOBAL LOGISTICS PVT LTD.....Respondent


Feb 08 1984

Mag Singh Vs. Board of Revenue for Rajasthan, Ajmer and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Feb-08-1984

Reported in: AIR1986Raj82

ORDERK.S. Lodha, J. 1. Shri Mag Singh has challengedthe order of a learned single Member of theBoard of Revenue, Ajmer, dt. 9-9-75 dismissingthe petitioner's


Aug 25 1986

Mag Das and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Aug-25-1986

Reported in: 1986(2)WLN586

Milap Chand Jain, J.1. This petition is directed against the order of the learned Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Sardar Shahar dated 19-10-1985 passed in Criminal Case No. 288 of 1985 under Sections 447, 427 and 379,


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 21 1951

The Dist. Mag. Vs. K. Subbanna

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-21-1951

Reported in: AIR1951Mad900; (1951)1MLJ570

ORDERPanchapakesa Ayyar, J.1. This petn. has been taken on file on a reference by the Dist. Mag., Chittoor, for quashing the charge Under Section 363, I. P. C. framed by the Stationary Sub-Mag., Madanapalle against


Dec 05 1964

Ramani Mohan Das and ors. Vs. Usai Mag

Court: Guwahati

Decided on: Dec-05-1964

Motion No. 1 of 1964 with a recommendation for setting aside the order, dated 12-12-1963, passed by the Magistrate First Class, Sabroom in Misc. Case No. 14 of 1963.2. The facts out of which this reference arises


Jun 27 1929

Bhagwan Das Vs. Town Mag. Budaun and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Jun-27-1929

Reported in: AIR1929All767

Sen, J.1. This is a plaintiff's appeal arising out of a suit for abatement of a public nuisance. The plaintiff owns a house numbered 151. Defendants 2 to 4 are the owners of a house numbered...


Oct 01 2012

Sri Banoth Ramesh and Another Vs. the Joint Collector and Addl. Distri ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Oct-01-2012

L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.25276 o”01. 10-2012 Sri Banoth Ramesh and another The Joint Collector & Addl. District Magistrate, Khammam District & others Counsel for the petitioners: Sri P. Vishnuvardhan Reddy Counsel for respondents : G.P. for


Aug 07 2013

V.Subbayamma, W/O Nageswara Rao Vs. Joint Collector, Additional Distri ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Aug-07-2013

HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.15454 of 2013 dated:07-08-2013 V.Subbayamma, W/o Nageswara Rao....Petitioner Joint Collector, Additional District Magistrate, Guntur and two others......Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.Challa Dhanamjaya Counsel for the Respondents: AGP for Revenue :


Sep 06 1999

Keshoram Surindranath Photo-mag (P.) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Assistant Commi ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Sep-06-1999

Reported in: [2001]121STC175(Kar)

V.K. SINGHAL, J. 1. All these appeals are disposed of by this common judgment since the controversy is common.2. The facts of Keshoram Surindranath Photo-Mag (P) Ltd., are taken into consideration. The appellant carries on the...


Mar 06 1990

R.M. Bhade Shop Inspector, Pune Vs. P.S. Malgaonkar Div. Mag.4.i.F. an ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-06-1990

Reported in: 1990(2)BomCR426

are written by the Section Officer, Government of Maharashtra, Industries, Energy and Labour Department, Mantralaya, Bombay. The trial Magistrate did not accept the defence and held that to be exempted from the provisions of the Bombay Shops


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial