Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Madding - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 17 2025

Sree Mad Janardhana Swamy Devaswom vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Mar-17-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALEE KRISHNA S. MONDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 26TH PHALGUNA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 30741 OF...


Dec 10 1964

Fakirappa Gangappa Madli and ors. Vs. the State of Mysore

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Dec-10-1964

Reported in: AIR1965Mys302; 1965CriLJ656; (1965)1MysLJ91

Tukol, J. (1) The seven petitioners have been committed to the Court of Sessions at Dharwar under Section 207A(10) of the Code of Criminal Procedure to stand their trial for offences punishable under Ss. 148 and...


Mar 09 2007

Mad Entertainment Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-09-2007

Reported in: (2007)(119)ECC359

1. Vide impugned order, Service Tax has been confirmed against the appellants by treating the services rendered by them as "advertising agency services" for the period 01/04/99 to 15/07/2001. In addition personal penalty has been imposed....


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 10 1922

Rathnamasari Declared Mad and ors. Vs. the Secretary of State for Indi ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-10-1922

Reported in: (1923)44MLJ132

1. This is an appeal in a land acquisition case against the decree of the District Court of Salem. Three plots of land, Survey Nos. 29, 34 and 35, suitable for housebuilding, were acquired for the...


1985

Rowland Vs. Mad River Local School Dist., Montgomery County, Ohio

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1985

ROWLAND v. MAD RIVER LOCAL SCHOOL DIST., MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO - 470 U.S. 1009 (1985) U.S. Supreme Court ROWLAND v. MAD RIVER LOCAL SCHOOL DIST., MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO , 470 U.S. 1009 (1985) 470 U.S. 1009...


May 14 2013

Kalidas Smriti Sankrit Ucch.Mad.Vid.DuA. Vs. the State of Madhya Prade ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: May-14-2013

W.P.No.6452/2008 Kalidas Smriti Sanskrit Uchchatar Madhyamik Vidyalaya vs State of M.P.and others 14/05/2013 Shri Vivek Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Abhijeet Bhomik, Advocate for the respondent - Board. Shri Lalit Joglekar, Panel Lawyer for the...


Sep 17 1993

Asstt. Director of Revenue Intelligence, Mad. Vs. Abdul Rasheed

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-17-1993

Reported in: 1994(69)ELT636(Mad)

1. This petition, under Section 439(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has been filed by the Assistant Director, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, 14, Gopalakrishna (Iyer) Road, T. Nagar, Madras-17, the complainant, praying for the cancellation...


Dec 21 1990

1 M Kalyansundaram (F. P. A. No. 17 (Mad) of 1990) 2. Sethuraman (F. P ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-21-1990

Reported in: [1991]188ITR35(Mad)

ORDERThis order will dispose of two connected appeals M. Kalyanasundaram v. Competent Authority, Madras 9FPA No. 17 (Mad) of 1990) and Sethuraman V. Competent Authority, Madras (FPA No. 24 (Mad) of 1990) which are directed against...


Feb 12 1957

The Rayala Corporation (Mad) Ltd. Vs. Syed Bawkar and Co. and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-12-1957

Reported in: AIR1957Mad385

1. Tile only question which demands consideration from us in this batch of civil revision petitions is whether the Rent Controller has not the power to summon witnesses other than public servants by the issue of...


Jan 08 1923

Pahal Ghorai Vs. Haji Munsi Fazl-ud-dIn Maham-mad and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-08-1923

Reported in: 76Ind.Cas.407

1. Mr. Mazumdar, who has opposed this appeal, has said every thing that could be said in this case; but, for the reasons which are about to be given, we are of opinion that this appeal...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial