Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Mac - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 22 1994

Mac Laboratories (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. the Collector of Central Excise, Bomb ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-22-1994

Reported in: AIR1995SC510; 1994LC625(SC); 1994(74)ELT769(SC); JT1994(7)SC496; 1994(4)SCALE1018; (1995)2SCC56; [1994]Supp5SCR621

not inside the system but outside the internal body system, although in a protected/covered cavity or orifice. M/s. Mac Laboratories have not shown any evidence to satisfy us and to convince us that their Kemicetine vaginal suppositories


Feb 07 2013

Mac Associates Vs. Sp Singh Chandel and anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-07-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 518/2011 Decided on 7th February, 2013 MAC ASSOCIATES Through ..... Appellant :Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Advocate with Mohd. Anis Rehman, Mr. Sumeet Batra and Ms.


Jan 28 2016

MAC Personal Care Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Laverana GMBH and Co. KG a ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-28-2016

products apart from exposure thereto through the internet. Respondent claims that it learnt of appellant using the mark MAC'S LAVERA in September, 2010 when it was published in the trademark journal No.1441 for purposes of opposition, to


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 22 2026

Tvl Macs Anchor Enterprises Private Limited Vs The State Tax Officer

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-22-2026

JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN AND WMP Nos. 17022 & 17023 of 2026 Tvl Macs Anchor Enterprises Private Limited (Rep by its Director Emilia Mary Leo Joseph) First Floor, 8A, 8B, 80 Feet


Feb 10 2026

Mac Percitec India vs Rekha S

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Feb-10-2026

VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 635 OF 2025 BETWEEN:1. MAC-PERCITEC INDIAA REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM SITUATED AT NO. B291(a) 7TH MAIN, PEENYA 2ND STAGE PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA BENGALURU -


Sep 16 2021

Mac Charles (India) Limited vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Sep-16-2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. NARAYANA PISHARADI THURSDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 25TH BHADRA, 1943 CRL.MC NO. 3193 OF 2021 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 30.11.2018...


Jun 30 2005

Mac Charles (i) Ltd. Vs. Chandrashekar and anr.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-30-2005

Reported in: 2006(1)ALD(Cri)44; III(2006)BC143; 2005CriLJ3700; ILR2005KAR3648; 2006(2)KarLJ570

Matched in: Parties Mac Charles (i) Ltd. Vs. Chandrashekar and anr.


Jun 03 2006

Mac Explotec (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-03-2006

Reported in: (2006)203CTR(Kar)409; [2006]286ITR378(KAR); [2006]286ITR378(Karn)

know-how towards manufacture of industrial explosives and also in certain allied manufacturing operations. The Company belongs to Mr. Machado family comprising of N.J. Machado and his wife Mrs. W.S.P. Machado. They were the Directors of the Company.


Oct 31 2003

Sterling's MAC Fast Food Vs. MC Donald's Corporation, Rep. by Its Pah ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Oct-31-2003

Reported in: ILR2004KAR2893; 2004(4)KarLJ612; 2005(30)PTC417(Karn)

agents, servants, employees, assigns and representatives from in any way using and advertising, directly or indirectly the word MAC as a trade mark or part of its trading style or any other name similar thereto in relation


Aug 12 2003

Mac-n-hom Systems Vs. P.S. Varrier

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Aug-12-2003

Reported in: AIR2004Ker91; 2003(3)KLT1179

was entered into at Kottakkal and it had to be performed at Kottakkal. As per the agreement the machinery had to be delivered, erected and commissioned at Kottakkal. The place of business, Factory, residence of this respondent


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial