M1 - Judgment Search Results

R. Parthasarathy Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Secretary to ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2008)3MLJ401

..... is filed for quashing g o rt no 362 commercial taxes and registration m1 department dated 15 4 2006 the english translation of said g o ..... is filed for quashing g o rt no 329 commercial taxes and registration m1 department dated 31 3 2006 the english translation of said g o ..... rules 1978 6 g o rt no 227 commercial taxes and registration m1 department dated 27 2 2006 is the subject matter of w p .....

Wadi Kumar Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh and Others

Court: Chhattisgarh

1 invoking supervisory jurisdiction of this court under article 227 of the constitution of india the petitioner herein has filed...

Shakti Nath and Ors. Vs.alpha Tiger Cyprus Investments No. 3 Ltd and O ...

Court: Delhi

..... secretariat wrote to the respondents noting that their nomination of m1 as arbitrator and that he would be invited to complete ..... project 33 according to the petitioners neither the chairman nor m1 possessed the requisite qualifications it is further submitted that while ..... to the galaxia project clearly the parties themselves by nominating m1 and m2 as their respective arbitrators decided to waive the .....

Zuari Maroc Phosphate Ltd vs.union of India

Court: Delhi

..... tribunal was constituted the nominee of zuari hereafter referred to as m1 and the nominee of the respondent hereinafter referred to as m2 ..... jointly appointed the presiding arbitrator pa who like m1 and m2 was a former chief justice of india cji zuari ..... vitiated the majority award the observations in the dissenting award about m1 having spoken frequently to the pa about his reservations to the .....

Management of Pudukottah Textile Limited Vs. A. Ganapathi, Etc., Etc.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1979)IILLJ343Mad

..... because these workmen have relinguished their rights not only under ext m1 series which formed the basis for the settlement under ext ..... to tamil nadu handloom board nearly 18 months thereafter under ext m1 series and about their being prepared to forego the compensation amount ..... claiming the amounts to which they will be entitled to ext m1 series are letters only intended to tamil nadu handloom board .....

Sri Y N Nanjappa Vs. Union of India

Court: Karnataka

..... rule118 1 being the exemption granted to transport vehicles of m1 category seating capacity of8passengers in addition to the driver ..... capacity not exceeding eighth passengers in addition to driver seat m1 category and not exceeding 3500 kilogram gross vehicle weight ..... central motor vehicles sixth amendment rules 2015 granting exemption to m1 category of vehicles and the notification dated october 01 .....

The Management of Best and Crompton Engineering Limited Vs. A.M.Sekar ...

Court: Chennai

..... as exx w1 to w10 and the management has marked 2 documents as exx m1 and m2 26 8 before the labour court the employee in w p ..... as exx w1 to w15 and the management has marked one document as ex m1 26 11 before the labour court the employee in w p 13068 of ..... as exx w1 to w9 and the management has marked 2 documents as exx m1 and m2 27 the labour court framed the following points for consideration i .....

Bpl Limited, Represented by Its Authorised Signatory, Mr. M. Jebakumar ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2007(4)AIRKarR623;

..... of its unit to sanyo bpl pvt ltd they have also admitted ex m1 and have gone through the contents in the light of the admission ..... examination again it is re iterated that it is true that in ex m1 it was mentioned that those who are not willing to accept the ..... witness volunteers that they have not understood the ex m1 he further admits that in ex m1 it is not mentioned that continuity of service will .....

S.Dhanalakshmi. Vs. the Inspector General of Registration,

Court: Chennai

..... cannot plead ignorance of not having received the proceedings no 70087 m1 89 dated 18 11 89 issued by the inspector general of ..... has not received the document in question namely proceedings no 70087 m1 89 dated 18 11 89 since the petitioner has admitted her ..... relevant communication passed by the respondent in his proceeding no 70087 m1 89 dated 18 11 89 there are several communications which have .....

Bpl Limited, Represented by Its. Vs. Mr. M. Shashikumar and ors

Court: Karnataka

..... of its unit to sanyo bpl pvt ltd they have also admitted ex m1 and have gone through the contents in the light of the admission ..... examination again it is re iterated that it is true that in ex m1 it was mentioned that those who are not willing to accept the ..... witness volunteers that they have not understood the ex m1 he further admits that in ex m1 it is not mentioned that continuity of service will .....