M Re - Judgment Search Results

M S vs.m

Court: Delhi

$~30 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:27. 02.2019 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 59/2019 M S Through: Mr. Satpal Malik & Mr. S.K. Gulati, ..... Appellant M versus Through: Advocates ..... … 59/2019 M S Through: Mr. Satpal Malik & Mr. S.K. Gulati, ..... Appellant M versus Through: Advocates ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The appellant is aggrieved

M vs.m S

Court: Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:23. d of April, 2019 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 76/2017 and C.M. Appl. No.16759/2017 M ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anshul Duggal, … Mr. Prateek Yadav, Advocates alongwith appellant in person. CORAM: M S Versus Through: Mr. Rajesh Raina, Advocate alongwith respondent in person. ..... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Challenge

M. Vs. Javali V. Mahajan Borewell and Co. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1997)143CTR(SC)320

of an offence under S. 276B, r/w S. 278B, of the IT Act, 1961 (Act for short) by M/s Borewell & Co., a registered partnership firm (the respondent No. 1) and its three partners (the respondents Nos. … 276B, r/w S. 278B, of the IT Act, 1961 (Act for short) by M/s Borewell & Co., a registered partnership firm (the respondent No. 1) and its three partners (the respondents Nos. 2 to 4). The Special

M. Vs. the Presiding Officer, Labour Court-i, C

Court: Andhra Pradesh

HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT APPEAL Nos.1367 OF2014and batch 25-09-2014 M.GopalAppellant The Presiding Officer, Labour Court-I, Chikkadpally, Hyderabad and two others ..Respondents Counsel for the Appellant: Sr.P. Sridhar Rao … HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT APPEAL Nos.1367 OF2014and batch 25-09-2014 M.GopalAppellant The Presiding Officer, Labour Court-I,

P vs.m

Court: Delhi

COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. h January, 2018 CM(M) 107/2018 & CM No.3387/2018 P M Through: Mr. Nalin Tripathi and Mr. A. ........ Petitioner Vashishtha, Advs. versus Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. … CM No.3387/2018 P M Through: Mr. Nalin Tripathi and Mr. A. ........ Petitioner Vashishtha, Advs. versus Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) CM No.3387/2018 Allowed, subject to just exceptions. MAC.APP.107/2018 1. The

M vs.A

Court: Delhi

$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:23. d March, 2018 CM(M) 140/2017 M A Through: Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Mr. Shamim, ........ Petitioner Ms. Charu Dalal and Mr. … Petitioner Ms. Charu Dalal and Mr. Ajay Pratap Singh, Advs. versus Through: Ms. Jhuma Bose, Adv. with ..... Respondent respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 An important question of law has arisen for

M. Vs.v.s.

Court: Delhi

in filing of appeal) Decided on:11. 04.2018 M. V.S. ..... Appellant Through: Mr Satish Kumar, Adv. Versus ..... Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.(ORAL) 1. The … IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~27 * % + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 73/2018, CM APPL. 13930/2018 (exemption), CM APPL. 13931/2018 (Stay) and CM APPL. 13932/2018 (Condonation of delay 35 days

A vs.m

Court: Delhi

NEW DELHI Date of Decision:23. d July, 2018 $~FM-10 * % + CM(M) 414/2018 & CM No.13871/2018 A M ........ Petitioner Through: In person versus Through: Mr. Harsh Vardhan Pandey, Advocate ..... Respondent along with petitioner in … & CM No.13871/2018 A M ........ Petitioner Through: In person versus Through: Mr. Harsh Vardhan Pandey, Advocate ..... Respondent along with petitioner in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has challenged the

M vs.A

Court: Delhi

* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:17. h August, 2018 + MAT.APP. 79/2010 M Through: Ms. Kajal Chandra, Ms. Prerna Chopra and Mr. Vivek Kapur, Advocates ..... Appellant A versus … Chopra and Mr. Vivek Kapur, Advocates ..... Appellant A versus Through: Mr. I.V. Raghav, Advocate along with ..... Respondent respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 The appellant has challenged the judgment dated 23rd

M vs.state of Nct & Anr

Court: Delhi

DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:6. h September, 2018 Decided on:20. h September, 2018 + W.P. (CRL) 1251/2018 M ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Malhotra with Mr. Ranjit Malhotra and Mr. Rajat Bhalla, Advocates. versus STATE OF … $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:6. h September, 2018 Decided on:20. h September, 2018 + W.P. (CRL) 1251/2018 M ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.