M Eswaraiah V State - Judgment Search Results

Ruchi Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. the Food Inspector, Division-ii

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2008(2)ALD(Cri)711; 2007(3)ALT(Cri)347

delay of two years after sample was taken and after obtaining the report of the Public Analyst.7. In M. Eswaraiah v. State of A.P., Food Inspector, Cuddapah 1999 (1) ALD (Crl.) 42 (AP) this Court held thus:Further by virtue of

G. Mallesh Vs. State of A.P.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2007CriLJ3394

shown.5. It is further contended by the learned Senior Counsel appearing as Amicus Curiae that a judgment in M. Eswaraiah v. State of A.P., Food Inspector, Cuddapah 1999 (1) ALD (Cri) 42 (AP), has wrongly held that Section 11(4) of

Ruchi Infrastructure Limited Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by Public Prosecut ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2008(1)ALD(Cri)197; 2008(1)ALT(Cri)123

delay of two years after sample was taken and after obtaining the report of the Public Analyst. In M. Eswaraiah v. State of A.P., Food Inspector, Cuddapah 1999 (1) ALD (Crl.) 42 (AP) this Court held thus:Further by virtue of

The Food Inspector, Karimnagar District, Vs. Kalluri Bhoomeshwar

Court: Andhra Pradesh

that there is violation of Section 11(4) of the Act in this case. He placed reliance on M.Eswaraiah V. State of A.P1 on this aspect. Section 11(4) of the Act contemplates production of article of food seized under

Mohd. Azam Vs. Birla Sunlife Insurance Co. Ltd. and Another

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Matched in: Court Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Mohamed Hyder Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1960AP479

' A Division Bench of this High Court also has expressed the view in similar terms in B. Eswaraiah v. State of Andhra, (1958) 1 Andh WR 132 at p. 136 : (AIR 1958 Andh Pra 288 at p. … suspension, with a view, to get the said order quashed. It is further prayed that a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction be made by this Court to reinstate him into office

State of Andhra Pradesh and ors. Vs. Mc. Dowell and Company Limited an ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(1)ALD639

be viewed in circumstantial flexibility. The principles of natural justice have undergone a sea change. Recently in P. Eswaraiah v. State of A.P. 2001 (4) ALD 644 (DB), this Bench has reiterated the position upon taking into consideration a … 9481 of 1999 were taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common judgmentFACTS:M/s. Mc Dowell and Company Limited is the petitioner in the aforementioned writ petitions. For convenience sake the parties will

K.A. Grace and Another Vs. M.S. Lakshmipathi Naidu and Others

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2000KAR1670; 2000(5)KarLJ255

Section 29(4) of the Act. Similar is the view expressed by this Court.17. In the case of J.M. Eswaraiah v Subramanya and Others, this Court has held even if the revision petition is numbered and admitted it is … or intervals at which the rent falls due.11. The Division Bench of this Court in Syed Abdul Wadood v State of Karnataka and Another, held that the object of Section 29 is to ensure payment of rent to

Narendra N. Das Vs. State of West Bengal

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1962Cal481,[1962(5)FLR382],(1963)IILLJ161Cal

above. Reference was also made to the decision of the Andhra High Court in the case of B. Eswaraiah v. State of Andhra (Now Andhra Pradesh) AIR 1958 Andh Pra 288 and in the case of Md. Hyder v. … the Governor is pleased to dismiss you from service with immediate effect By order of the Governor,R. K. MitraSecy. to the Govt of West Bengal,Home Dept.' The question for consideration is--does the order set out above satisfy

Naresh Kumar Kedia Vs. Director Institute of Preventive Medicine, Publ ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2006FAJ175

to be withdrawn.4. The learned Counsel for the petitioner further relied on the decision of the Court inM. Eswaraiah v. State of A.P. Food Inspector, Cuddapah 1999 (2) EFR 537 and 2004 (2) FAC 229 (A.P. High Court).5. Per … under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code to quash the proceedings pending on the file of the VII Metropolitan Magistrate, Chudi Bazar, Hyderabad in C.C. No. 22/2005 for the offence punishable under Section 16(1)(a)(i), 7(i) and 2(ia)(f)