Lux - Judgment Search Results

M/S. LUX INDUSTRIES LTD Vs The Tamil Nadu Chief Controlling Revenue Au ...

Court: Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated 17.03.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR Lux Industries Ltd., rep. by its Director Navin Kumar Todi, branch office at Door No.5/185-1, Avinashilingampalayam, Avinashi Taluk, Tirupur

Lux Hosiery Industries Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2009)20VST292(Mad)

Matched in: Parties Lux Hosiery Industries Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer and ors.

Trans-lux Dist. Corp. Vs. Board of Regents Univ. N. Y.

Court: US Supreme Court

TRANS-LUX DIST. CORP. v. BOARD OF REGENTS UNIV. N. Y. - 380 U.S. 259 (1965) U.S. Supreme Court TRANS-LUX DIST. CORP. v. BOARD OF REGENTS UNIV. N. Y., 380 U.S. 259 (1965) 380 U.S. 259 TRANS-LUX...

Miller and Lux Vs. Sacramento Drainage District

Court: US Supreme Court

Miller & Lux v. Sacramento Drainage District - 256 U.S. 129 (1921) U.S. Supreme Court Miller & Lux v. Sacramento Drainage

Miller and Lux, Inc. Vs. East Side Canal and Irrig. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Miller & Lux, Inc. v. East Side Canal & Irrig. Co. - 211 U.S. 293 (1908) U.S. Supreme Court Miller &

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Hi Lux Automotive (P.) Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [2009]183TAXMAN260(Delhi)

Matched in: Parties Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Hi Lux Automotive (P.) Ltd.

Hindustan Lever Ltd. Vs. Lux Flavours and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2003(27)PTC365(Mad)

inter-alia the price list issued by the plaintiff in which the products were classified under several heads as lux, liquor flavours, lux perfumery compounds and lux soap compounds. The defendants produced the price list dated 5-9-1991. Wherein

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. Lux Hosiery Industries Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 2004(4)CHN531,(2005)IILLJ797Cal

Matched in: Parties Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. Lux Hosiery Industries Ltd.

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. De Luxe Film Distributors Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1978]114ITR434(Cal)

as follows : '1. In consideration of a sum of Rs. 20,101 to be paid by Messrs. De Luxe Film Distributors Ltd. to Sri Amar Das Mallick, the said Sri Amar Das Mallick gives up all his

Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Neo Luxe India Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1999)(107)ELT360TriDel

1. The issue involved in the appeal preferred by the Revenue is whether the plastic laminated sheet is classifiable under sub-heading 3920.31 of the schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act as claimed by the Revenue...