Lucky - Judgment Search Results

Ratheesh vs Lucky

Court: Kerala

AGED 32 YEARS S/O.GOPINADHAN, REENA NIVAS, VARKALA DESOM, VARKALA VILLAGE, MIATHANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. P.ANIYAN SURIN GEORGE IPE RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED/STATE: 1 LUCKY AGED 39 YEARS S/O.SATHYADAS, KADAYIL VEEDU, PALAYAMKUNNU, AYROOR VILLAGE, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 225. 2 STATE OF KERALA

Lucky Vs. State of Punjab and Another --respondents

Court: Punjab and Haryana

the petitioner was ready and willing to compensate the complainant. The order passed on 28.5.2013 reads as follows:- Lucky 2014.01.15 10:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh CRR No.1805 of 2013(O&M) -2-

Lucky Vs. State of Punjab --respondent

Court: Punjab and Haryana

appellants/present petitioners under section 379 I.P.C was set aside. However, conviction and sentence of both the appellants/petitioners herein Lucky under section 411 I.P.C stands upheld. Consequently, the petitioners are in 2014.01.22 13:34 I attest to the accuracy

Lucky Vs. State of U.T. Chandigarh and Another

Court: Punjab and Haryana

THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M- 31686 of 2013 (O&M) Decided on : 27.01.2014 Lucky ..Petitioner Versus State of U.T.Chandigarh and another ..Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHAVIR S. CHAUHAN Present : Mr.Karamjeet

Lucky Vs. State of Haryana --respondent

Court: Punjab and Haryana

taken a stand that it was the petitioner, who had demarcated the place of residence of deceased Satish. Lucky 2014.01.28 14:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh CRM No.M-43198 of 2013(O&M) -2-

Lucky Vs. State of Punjab --respondent

Court: Punjab and Haryana

stand abated and survives qua Rukmani Devi alone. Asha Rani, who was married to Krishan Lal (since deceased) Lucky i.e.son of Rukmani Devi (sole surviving appellant) is the deceased in this 2014.02.24 12:20 I attest to the

Lucky Vs. State of Haryana --respondent

Court: Punjab and Haryana

sufficient means to pay the amount of penalty, then, he is to undergo simple imprisonment for six months. Lucky 2014.02.26 12:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh CRA No.4387-SB of 2013 (O&M)

Lucky Vs. State of Punjab --respondent

Court: Punjab and Haryana

following order was passed by this Court in CRM No.M-33544 of 2013 (Yadwinder Singh versus State of Punjab):- Lucky 2014.05.20 11:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh CRM No.M-33831 of 2013 (O&M)

State vs.lucky

Court: Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % + STATE LUCKY CRL.A.539/2016 versus Reserved on:05. 05.2017 Delivered on:17. 05.2017 ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case:

Lucky Minmat Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2000]245ITR830(SC); JT2000(10)SC328; (2001)9SCC669

Matched in: Parties Lucky Minmat Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax