Lower Court - Judgment Search Results

Sulaikha vs No Respondent Before the Lower Court

Court: Kerala

51 YEARS 9 MR.ABDULKAREEM AGED 49 YEARS BY ADVS. SHIBIN K.F. SHOBY K.FRANCIS RESPONDENT: NO RESPONDENT BEFORE THE LOWER COURT THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.03.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE

C.P. Sureshan, (Wrongly Shown as P.P. Suresh in Lower Court Judgments ...

Court: Kerala

20.06.2013 CRL.A.NO.337/2013 OF SESSIONS COURT, THALASSERY DATED 20.06.2018 REVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED: C.P. SURESHAN, (WRONGLY SHOWN AS P.P. SURESH IN LOWER COURT JUDGMENTS) AGED 55 YEARS, S/O NARAYANAN, ACHUTHA RAM HOUSE, AZHIKKAL, KANNUR, PIN - 670009 BY ADVS. ABDUL RAOOF

“5. the Sole Ground Canvassed in the Application Is That the Learned ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

under (paras 5 and 6 ) :-“5. The sole ground canvassed in the application is that the learned lower Court has hurriedly decided the application for grant of injunction and that as such, it is apparent that the … perusal of the averments itself shows that after the counsel for the applicants had appeared before the learned lower Court on 18.9.2011, the matter was adjourned to 1.11.2012 for filing the written statement. An adjournment of about two

“In the Instant Case the Learned Lower Court Which Passed the Ex-par ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

medium of impugned judgment dated 4.11.1999, which, in substance, is as under:- “In the instant case, the learned lower court, which passed the ex-parte decree took much precaution by issuing munadi against defendant No.4 appellant and her brothers

Nama Nagayya Vs. Kalle Narasayya Described as Kalle Narasimhayya in Re ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1938Mad853; (1938)2MLJ501

as it has not been acknowledged validly by the petitioner's guardian, the suit was rightly dismissed by the lower Court. The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed with costs. - - No doubt he may have been managing the

Boodapati Ankamma, Wrongly Described as Nannuru Ankamma in the Decree ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1937)1MLJ192

misguided relatives, I do not find any ground on which I can interfere with the decision of the lower Appellate Court.2. The plaintiff sued for a declaration that the defendant was not his legally wedded wife; and