Lotus - Judgment Search Results

Lotus, vs the Tahsildar (Land Records)

Court: Kerala

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 2ND AGRAHAYANA, 1944 PETITIONERS: 1 LOTUS, AGED 52 YEARS, W/O. SASIKUMAR, GOKULAM, NANMA NAGAR, KARUNAGAPPALLY P.O., KOLLAM - 690 518. 2 DAISY, AGED 46

Lotus Line (P.) Ltd. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1965SC1314; 1965MPLJ877(SC); [1965]2SCR699

Matched in: Parties Lotus Line (P.) Ltd. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Lotus 8 A' Part Hotel Vs. the Intelligence Officer

Court: Kerala

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE20H DAYOF NOVEMBER201329TH KARTHIKA, 1935 WP(C).No. 28440 of 2013 (D) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- LOTUS8A' PART HOTELS OPP. COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIR PORT NEDUMBASSERY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS ACCOUNTS MANAGER SUJOY. S. BY

Lotus Refineries Private Limited Vs. National Spot Exchange Limited

Court: Mumbai

Matched in: Parties Lotus Refineries Private Limited Vs. National Spot Exchange Limited

Lotus Nikko Hotels Travel Pvt Ltd vs.ashok Chopra & Co & Ors

Court: Delhi

DELHI Judgment Reserved On : February 06, 2017 Judgment Delivered On : February 16, 2017 EFA (OS) No.2/2011 LOTUS NIKKO HOTELS TRAVEL PVT. LTD. .... Appellant Represented by: Mr.L.K.Singh, Mr.Sonal Sinha, Ms.Saira Parveen & Ms.Tanvi Khurana, Advocates.

Lotus Herbals Limited vs.the Chief Commissioner of Custom & Ors

Court: Delhi

$~1 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 110/2016 LOTUS HERBALS LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Mohan Vidhani with versus Mr.O.P.Bansal and Mr.Ashish Singh, Advocates. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF

Lotus Green Llp vs.renowned Buildtech Private Limited

Court: Delhi

COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d November, 2017 Pronounced on:04. h December, 2017 CS(COMM) 400/2017 LOTUS GREEN LLP ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr.T.K.Ganju, Sr. Adv. with and Mukhi Mr.Ashish Ms.Madhurima Kapoor, Advs. versus RENOWNED

M/s.lotus Wine Shop Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka Dharwad

it is violative of Section 71(2)(e) of the Karnataka Excise Act, 1965 etc.,. In W.P. No.146644/2020: BETWEEN M/s. Lotus Wine Shop At Belur, Tq. & Dist. Dharwad, Rep. by its Partner, 8 Shri Narayan Chandrashekar Kalal, Age

Lotus Commercial India Pvt Ltd. vs Naturoll Foods Llp

Court: Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 224/2026 LOTUS COMMERCIAL INDIA PVT LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Risabh Tiwari, Advocate.versusNATUROLL FOODS LLP .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM

Lotus Herbals Private Limited vs Dpka Universal Consumer Ventures Priv ...

Court: Delhi

for sale, advertising, directly or indirectly dealing in Cosmetics, Beauty and Hygiene products under the impugned trade mark LOTUS SPLASH or LOTUS derivative marks or any other identical and/or deceptively similar trade marks to that of the