Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: lottery Page 19 of about 635,318 results (0.027 seconds)

Jaldu Manikyala Rao Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1955AP116; [1955]28ITR220(AP)

..... question may also be asked : is the receipt arising out of the transaction in the nature of windfall, of a casual and non-recurring nature and not properly describable as arising from ahy business or trade if a man draws a prize at a lottery, or makes a profitable bet or wins a prize in a crossword competition, as it is called, the receipt could scarcely be described as arising from any business.still another question which would have a bearing on the matter would be : is it an investment i.e. ..... the transaction cannot be described as one of speculation like a bet or buying a ticket in a lottery. .....

Dr. Samir Kr. Das Vs. Aparna Das @ Tripti Das

Court : Guwahati

..... such irritating idiosyncrasies are part of the lottery in which every spouse engages on marrying, and taking the partner of the marriage 'for better, for worse'. .....

Tulsa W/O Pannalal Koli Vs. Pannalal Natha Koli and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1963MP5; 1962MPLJ987

..... idiosyncracacies of thisnature may sometimes be irritating to the other spouse but they are part of the lottery in which every spouse engages on marrying and taking the partner of the marriage 'for better, for worse. .....

Narayan Prasad Choubey Vs. Smt. Prabhadevi

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1964MP28

..... now the question precisely before us is whether that can be a ground for judicial separation, pur answer is clearly in the negative, 'irritating idiosyncrasies are part of the lottery an which every spouse engages on marrying and taking the partner of the marriage 'for better, for worse. .....

Shri Pritpal Singh Vs. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2007(2)ARBLR426(Delhi); 139(2007)DLT431; 2007(95)DRJ21

..... , clause 2 of this license agreement clearly provided that the allotted shop would be on an appropriate floor matching the existing shop being dismantled and the exact location would be decided after construction of the new shops by lottery to be held in public with due notice to all concerned.8. .....

Maharaja Nadar Vs. Muthukani Ammal

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1986Mad346

..... . such irritating idiosyncrasies are part of the lottery in which every spouse engages on marrying, and taking the partner of the marriage 'for better, for worse' .....

Pandurang Tukaram Kamble Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

..... for the purpose of housing for the poor mathadi kamgars, consistent to the development plan intended in the area, to be prepared and approved by the planning authority, public notice was required to be published, if land is to be allotted by adopting a lottery system or draw of lots amongst beneficiaries/persons who may apply for allotment of the government land. .....

M/s. Ghodawat Energy Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Through t ...

Court : Mumbai

..... martin lottery agencies ltd. .....

V. Sivagnanam Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by Secretary to Government, ...

Court : Chennai

..... there are two distinct offences alleged against chandrasekar, one is that he was selling lottery ticket in violation of tlr act and the second is for projecting himself as sivagnanam, when he was arrested, remanded and released on bail. ..... , in other words, chandrasekar is liable to be prosecuted for selling lotteries, which is a distinct offence under violation of tlr act, and when chandrasekar was caught, that offence ended. .....

Rajas R. Doshi Vs. Income-tax Officer.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1994)48TTJ(Mumbai)187

..... it is something like a tenant acquiring the benefit of a lottery, which has nothing to do with the tenancy. .....