Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: lottery Court: rajasthan Page 1 of about 17,097 results (0.022 seconds)

Shankuntla and 3 ors. Vs. Chairman, Housing Board, Jaipur and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1981WLN296

..... all the 31 applicants who were successful in the drawing of lots in the first instance, had gone to their houses to disclose this news and as such were not present when the action of cancelling the first lottery and to hold the drawing of lots a second time, but even if it may be believed for argument's sake, such action is of no consequence till it is held that the petitioners had acquired a legal right in the houses allotted to them ..... went to gandhi nagar club for obtaining the order of allotment he was shocked to hear that the above noted scheme was made subject matter of re-draw of lot in his absence and the lottery was taken out for the higher income group out-right purchase for the salaried persons again in which the petitioner could not get success- the petitioner was told that no house will be ..... 1676/80 that as many schemes were under allotment and as the housing officer had announced it earlier that the house numbers will be alloted after the lottery for all schemes were completed, as such after the announcement of the petitioner's name on the mike the petitioner went to his house to convey this happy news to his family members. ..... in my view the proceedings of the drawing of lots in the first instance was not completed when the action of cancelling the first lottery and to hold the drawing of lots a second time was taken by the property allotment committee. .....

State of Assam and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1996(1)WLN651

..... the apex court in its interim order dated 21.4.94 are wholly complied with and once the petitioners unable to prove that the lotteries conducted by the petitioners-states fulfil the requirements laid down by the apex court, the state of rajasthan has no jurisdiction to impose a ban on the sale of tickets ..... controverted the proposition putforth by the learned counsel for the petitioners-states and he frankly and rightly conceded that the lotteries organized by the government of india or government of a state has been taken away from the legislative field of the state legislature and as such, lotteries 'organized by the states are covered under entry 40 list i schedule 7 of the constitution of india and the ..... that finance department (r & ai division) government of rajasthan issued a notice dated 23.8.95 (annexure-f) by which, the state governments were permitted to sale their lottery tickets within the territory of state of rajasthan for which they are required to obtain prior permission from the state of rajasthan in case they fulfil the requirements ..... state government has legislative or executive power to impose a ban on the sale of tickets of a lottery 'organized' by the government of india or government of a state whereas, the state government has power to legislate under entry 34 list ii schedule vii of the constitution of india regarding 'betting and gambling' but the lotteries organized by the government of india or government of a state have been specially taken away from the .....

Rajendra Kumar Shah Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1985(2)WLN81

..... provisions contained in entry 40 in list i of schedule vii, as well as articles 73, 258 and 298 of the constitution, the supreme court has observed that the executive power of the union in respect of lotteries organised by the government of a state has to exercise subject to the provisions of the constitution, including article 298, which expressly extends the executive power of the state to the carrying on of any trade or ..... the tickets sold or unsold in order to save the state from huge loss of public revenue and with that end in view, sub-clause (iii) of para 10 of the state lotteries scheme and para 18 of the scheme of the holi bumper draw were amended by notification dated 19th march, 1985 so as to provide that the draw would be made out of sold as well as ..... a large number of bumper draws being allowed unexpectedly by the various state governments and union territories and imposition of 20% sales tax on sale of lottery tickes in west bengal and tamil nadu which are very good markets in rajasthan lotteries, the sale of tickets of the holi bumper draw adversely affected and out of 48 lacs tickets that were printed about 16 lacs only were sold ..... sub-clause it has also been provided that a list of tickets remaining unsold with the camp incharge shall be given to the director a day before the date of draw of lottery by them and that all the tickets whether sold or unsold shall be eligible for prizes and that if the numbers drawn out, are of tickets remaining unsold, the prizes .....

Girdhari Singh Bapna and Etc. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1997Raj24; 1996(3)WLC226; 1996(1)WLN617

..... from the facts stated in both the petitions, it appears that the petitioners have spoused the cause of general public and want ban to be imposed on the sale of single digit lottery conducted either by the central government, state of rajasthan or other state governments as well as private agencies within the territory of state of rajasthan, as according to them the same ..... it is true that the aforesaid order has been passed with the mutual consent arrived at between the lottery stockists of other states and the state of himachal pradesh, but the message which goes to the society from the above order of the himachal pradesh high court is that ..... under article 226 of the constitution of india in the nature of public interest litigation for issuance of direction to the union of india to enact laws prohibiting the sale of single digit lottery either 'organised' by the central government or other state governments, they are being disposed of by a common order. ..... the said fact the himachal pradesh high court has issued mandamus directing the state of himachal pradesh not to allow the sale of single digit lotteries organised by the state of himachal pradesh or any other state in the entire state of himachal pradesh. ..... circumstances stated above, i am of the opinion that the central government should consider the feasibility of enacting a uniform law banning the sale of tickets of lotteries throughout the country whether it is 'organised' by the central government or by the state governments. .....

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Suresh Kumar Goyal

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (2004)190CTR(Raj)344; [2004]270ITR50(Raj)

..... as under: '(iii) there is a very peculiar feature coming out in this case that assessee shri satish kumar has purchased a lottery ticket of bhutan state in the last week of november, 1987 in the name of shri suresh kumar goyal amounting to rs. ..... a concurrent finding of fact by the cit(a) as well as by the tribunal that on the basis of enquiry made by the ao, it cannot be believed that assessee suresh kumar has purchased this lottery ticket in market after lottery draw held, from somebody else to convert his black money into white.11. ..... and cit(a) were right in law in taking a view different than the view of the ao, when the assessee has failed to prove the authenticity of the purchase of lottery ticket and on the basis of evidence the ao has made additions under section 69 of the act ?'3. ..... and cit(a) were right in law in taking a view different than the view of the ao, when the assessee has failed to prove the authenticity of the purchase of lottery ticket and on the basis of evidence the ao has made additions under section 69 of the act ? ..... the facts and circumstances of the case, the tribunal and cit(a) were right in law in taking different view than ao when the assessee has failed to prove about the authenticity of purchase of lottery and on the basis of evidence the ao has made additions under section 69 of the act ?4. ..... whether there was any material on record for cit(a) to hold that the lottery amount in the hands of all three brothers is to be substantively taxed for the year .....

Kutubudeen and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2009(1)Raj530

..... revealed that in the said register of advisory committee, 138 persons from pugal, 2 persons from jhudkiya, 80 persons from ramda and 82 persons from jodhasar were eligible for allotment but in the lottery register, more persons were found to have been allotted the land whose applications were neither placed before the advisory committee nor their applications were received prior to 31.10.88. ..... being hue and cry for not placing the applications before the advisory committee on 24.9.90 and a separate bundle was found and their applications were considered and allotments were made by lottery vide articles 30 to 33, whether it can be said that these allotments were made with any criminal intention? ..... during investigation, it was also found that the forged entries were made in the lottery register without there being any entry in the register of advisory committee as well as in the inward register ..... been examined by the court, are not there in the register of the advisory committee but their names are available in the lottery register, articles 30 to 33, which is of the same date i.e. 24.9.90. ..... course said that the names of the allottees, who did not file the applications, were entered in the lottery register without recommendation of the advisory committee. ..... 45/92 then certain documents relating to the lottery register for the year 1991 of villages ramda, pugal, jhudkiya and jodhasar and one register of advisory committee of pugal and certain files relating to allotment of land in the canal .....

Pursottam Bhojwani Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2001(1)WLN725

ordershethna, j. 1. mr. vyas, learned addl. advocate general is present before the court for the respondents. respondent no.4, for whom the notice has returned unserved with the endorsement that there is no such post. (2). this petition was filed on 20.1.1999 praying that the petitioner may be permitted to carry on his business of sale of lottery tickets at jalori gate counter and the respondents be restrained from harassing the petitioner in sale of lottery tickets, which are made available to him from different sources. stay as prayed for is not granted in this petition. (3). i am of the considered opinion that no right much less fundamental right of the petitioner guaranteed under the constitution is violated. therefore, no such relief as prayed for can be granted. in fact, lottery is banned by many states of this country because it ruins people belonging to power and backward class. (4). in view of the above discussion, this petition fails and is hereby dismissed. stay petition is also dismissed.

Jeeta Ram Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1971WLN147

..... . thus, the learned magistrate has acted without jurisdiction regarding the charge relating to the forgery of the lottery ticket when he recorded the plea of the accused thereon and then he eventually convicted him, though he did not mention the right section in his order.10 ..... the alleged forged ticket is said to have been presented before the authority of the state lottery department of jammu & kashmir, who had produced that ticket there and under what circumstances and what was its condition, a thorugh investigation needed to have been made by the police. ..... . in the present case the charge framed by the learned magistrate itself indicated that it was the accused who had forged the lottery ticket by changing the figure 'i' to '7' in it ..... there is no manner of doubt that a lottery ticket the production of which will enable the person holding the ticket to receive the amount of the prize is a valuable security. ..... eventually the director of lotteries reported the matter with the kashmir police and a case was registered against lalchand and khema. ..... b-155027 of the state lottery of jammu & kashmir and told him that in the third draw of the lottery on 11-1-70. ..... the prosecution case, in brief, was that the accused had approached the complainant hastimal kothari of pali on 22-1-70 with a lottery ticket bearing no. ..... shri lalchand and khema then went to srinagar and there contracted the director of the state lotteries. .....

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and anr. Vs. Smt. Pista Aga ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1985(1)WLN415

..... accident cases & taking a liberal view of the entire matter & at the same time safeguarding against the various hazards of life and business keeping in view the cautions given by apex court, that it should not be the windfall or lottery but only an objective adjudication of the expected benefits, the tribunal has to calculate the compensation.59 .....

State of Raj. and ors Vs. Manju and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... the learned single judge with reference to rule 9 of the rules in particular returned the finding that it not being permissible thereunder to adopt the method of lottery to make selection for recruitment, the process was vitiated thereby and thus, interfered with the public notice dated 11.8.2013 purportedly releasing the provisional merit list of ..... that stage the respondents- writ petitioners invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court contending inter-alia that the adoption of the method of lottery system for the purpose of selecting the candidates for recruitment was in violation of the rules apart from disregarding the rules of reservation as ..... as the respondents-writ-petitioners having participated in the process without any demur being fully aware that the norms of lottery would be eventually applied for the purpose of short listing the candidates for appointment, they are estopped from impeaching the ..... the persons having two years.working experience of safai in any municipality of the state of rajasthan were considered to be eligible for the post in terms of rule 6 of the rules and thus, lottery system was a permissible and pragmatic method of short listing the candidates out of huge number of applications. ..... the learned counsel for the appellants have insistently argued that as the rules do not debar lottery mechanism to be a 4 method of selecting candidates for recruitment as safai karamchari thereunder, the determination to the contrary made by the learned single judge is .....