Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
..... with the intention of not providing them as offered or creating impression that something is being given or offered free of charge when it is fully or partly covered by the amount charged in the transaction as a whole; (b) the conduct of any contest, lottery, game of chance or skill for the purpose of promoting, directly or indirectly, the sale, use or supply of any product or any business interest; (3a) withholding from the participants of any scheme offering gifts, prizes or other items free .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
Reported in : 2001(2)MPHT96(CG)
..... in the said case, the supreme court white interpreting the provisions of section 2(1)(d) of bombay lotteries and price competition control and tax act, observed that looking to the intention of legislature, the word 'or' must be read as 'and'. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
Reported in : AIR2006Chh92
sunil kumar sinha, j. 1. in this batch of appeals, a question to be considered is whether the letters patent appeals are maintainable in this high court?2. the resume necessary for adjudication is as under:the state of chhattisgarh came into existence on 1st of november 2000, that is the appointed day, pursuant to m.p. reorganisation act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the act of 2000). it is a successor state. part iv of the act of 2000 relates to establishment of the high court. section 21 provides that from the appointed day, there shall be a separate high court for the state of chhattisgarh (hereinafter referred as 'the high court of chhattisgarh') and the high court of madhya pradesh shall become the high court for the state of madhya pradesh. section 22 provides for judges of chhattisgarh high court and section 23 provides for the jurisdiction of the chhattisgarh high court. it has been stipulated in the act of 2000 that the high court of chhattisgarh shall have, in respect of any part of the territories included in the state of chhattisgarh, all such jurisdiction, powers and authority, as under the law in force immediately before the appointed day are exercisable in respect to that part of the said territories by high court of madhya pradesh. section 25 provides for practice and procedure of the high court of chhattisgarh. it has been provided that subject to the provisions of part iv, the law in force immediately before the appointed day with respect to practice and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
Reported in : AIR2007Chh120
vijay kumar shrivastava, j.1. all these writ petitions under article 226 of the constitution of india relate to challenge the validity of policy-decision for, transportation of food-grains to fair price shop which abstains marketing societies or consumer stores to carry both the works together of lead agency and fair price shops. constitutional validity of imposition of condition whereby maximum limit of three fair price shops has been incorporated in public distribution system (control) order, 2004 (for short 'order 2004') for allotment of shops to various agencies. issuance of public notice inviting tenders by the state civil supplies corporation ltd., for transportation of foodgrains, and vires of clause 9(1)(2)(3)(4) of the order, 2004 as substituted vide notification dated 21-3-2006. having common questions for decision all these petitions are taken together, and are being disposed on by this common order.2. the essential commodities act, 1955, (for short, 'the act, 1955') has been enacted by the union of india with the object of equitable distribution and supply of essential commodities to the public at large. on being delegated the state is also competent to enact such statutory orders under section 3 of the act, 1955 for attaining the avowed purposes of the act, 1955 including distribution of essential commodities to the ration card holders of public at large through fair price shops. for the first time, erstwhile state of m.p. enacted m.p. foodstuffs distribution ( .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
Reported in : 2001(4)MPHT79(CG)
orderr.s. garg, j. 1. the petitioner gurumukh singh hora, the chairman of chhattisgarh co-operative marketing federation, has challenged the correctness, validity and propriety of the order dated 8-12-2000 passed by the additional registrar, co-operative societies, raipur (respondent no. 4). 2. the facts necessary for the disposal of the present petition are that the petitioner is the chairman of chhattisgarh co-operative marketing federation. according to him, he has assumed the charge of the office on 30-10-2000, therefore, under the provisions of rule 43-a (2) of m.p. cooperative societies rules, 1962 within one year of assumption of the charge by him, a no-confidence motion cannot be moved against him but as a no-confidence motion has been moved against him and as the additional registrar has appointed an officer to preside the meeting, the action is bad. the petitioner, in fact, was elected as chairman of m.p. state co-operative marketing federation on 4-1-97 for a period of five years and unless a mishap occurs he could continue upto 3-1-2002. on 1-11-2000, the state of chhattis-garh came into being and in accordance with the provisions of m.p. sahkari society (punargathan aur nirman) adhyadesh (4/2000) the said m.p. state co-operative marketing federation (hereinafter referred to as m.p. federation) was divided into two and the chhattisgarh rajya sahkari vipanan sangh maryadit (hereinafter referred to as chhattisgarh federation) also came into being. the petitioner as .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
Reported in : AIR2007Chh90
s.r. nayak, c.j.1.this writ petition preferred under articles 226/227 of the constitution of india is directed against the proceedings of the national commission for scheduled castes and scheduled tribes, the first respondent herein registered in file no. 2/fcs 2/2001-ssw-l and the 'findings' contained in the report dated 16-10-2001. the petitioner has sought for quashing of the impugned proceedings by writ of certiorari and also prayed for a writ of mandamus to declare the findings contained in the report dated 16-10-2001 as void and inoperative. in addition, the petitioner has sought for a direction restraining the respondents from conducting any proceeding or taking any action pursuant to the complaint filed by the sixth respondent herein or the impugned findings of the first respondent-commission.2. the facts of the case leading to filing of this writ petition may be noted in the first instance and they, as stated by the petitioner himself, in brief, are as follows:the petitioner belongs to a tribal community known as 'kawar/kanwar' which is notified as scheduled tribe under the constitution scheduled tribe order, 1950. the petitioner's forefathers were resident of a tribal hamlet called jogi dongari in village sarbahara, tahsil pendra road, district bilaspur which is predominantly inhabited by tribals. as far back as in the year 1967 a social status/caste certificate was issued in favour of the petitioner by the competent officer i.e. naib tahsildar, pendra road, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
cav order: 1. petitioners have preferred these writ petitions challenging the common impugned order dated 12-1-2012 passed by the revisional authority i.e. union of india dismissing their revision applications to affirm the order dated 4-2-2010 passed by the state of chhattisgarh rejecting their applications for grant of prospecting licence and allowing the application of the respondent - godawari power project and ispat limited (for short 'the godawari') grant of mining lease of iron ore over an area admeasuring 32.360 hectares comprising in forest compartment no.139 (new forest compartment no.608), village kachche, forest range and forest division bhanupratappur, district north bastar, kanker. 2. since both the writ petitions have thrown challenge to the same order and the application for grant of prospecting licence preferred by each of the petitioner was part of the same larger area, both the writ petitions are considered and disposed of by this common order. 3. facts of the case, briefly stated, are that the area admeasuring 921.00 hectares bearing forest compartment no.139 (new forest compartment no.608), village kachche, forest range and forest division bhanupratappur, district north bastar, kanker, was initially allotted to the bhilai steel plant for a period of 30 years ending on 17-3-993. bhilai steel plant surrendered the area on 22-12-1998. the state government, thereafter, issued a notification under rule 59 (1) (ii) of the mineral concession rules, 1960 (for .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
Reported in : 2005(1)MPHT35(CG)
orderl.c. bhadoo, j.1. by this writ petition under article 226 of the constitution of india, the petitioner has questioned the legality, propriety and validity of the order/circular dated 23-5-2001 issued by the excise commissioner of the state of chhaittsgarh (respondent no. 2), whereby the petitioner was asked to affix holograms/stickers on the sealed bottles of country liquor supplied by him on the same terms and conditions and at the same cost fixed by the respondents, on the ground that the said order is bad in law being contrary to the tender/license conditions. the petitioner has also challenged the order dated 1-8-2003 whereby the representation of the petitioner was rejected.2. brief facts leading to filing of this writ petition are that the petitioner is a public limited company duly incorporated under the provisions of the indian companies act, 1956, under the certificate of incorporation. the petitioner company is dealing and engaged in distilling/manufacturing liquor, spirit and other intoxicant liquids, which are distilled in its own distilleries. the excise commissioner of the erstwhile state of madhya pradesh had issued a notice inviting tender (nit) on 7-3-2000 for bottling and supply of the country made spirit in sealed bottles on certain terms and conditions, which are extracted in annexure f-2. in response to the said nit, the petitioner quoted competitive rates for the license period commencing from 1-4-2000 to 31-3-200?. and the tender of the petitioner .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
Reported in : AIR2004Chh18
orderfakhruddin, j.1. by this writ petition filed under art. 226/227 of the constitution of india, petitioner, prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate form of direction/order restraining the respondents nos. 1 to 17 from issuing work/purchase orders to respondents no. 32 to 35. further prayer of the petitioner is to the effect that respondents no. 1 to 31 be commanded to implement the clause of earnest money exemption to small scale industrial unit of chhattisgarh state as per the clause 4.7 of chhattisgarh state store purchase rule 2002. petitioner has also further prayed that tender of the petitioner be opened as the same has not been opened.2. the petitioner is a manufacturer of daliya and ready-to-eat food. it is a small scale industrial unit duly registered. copy of the certificate of the registration has been filed vide annexures p-29 & p-30, as such. it has been established and is working at raipur. it is submitted that respondent no.2 published an advertisement on 4-4-2003 (annexure p-1) in hindi dally navbharat inviting tenders for 2003-2004 for supply of ready-to-eat food in various anganwadi centers mentioning therein that the tenderers should deposit rs.300/- for purchase of tender form. it is also stated that the petitioner deposited the said amount for purchase and obtained the tender from vide annexure p-2. it is also submitted that after fulfilling the formalities, he submitted the tender form duly filled to respondent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
Reported in : AIR2006Chh36; 2006(2)MPHT68(CG)
a.k. patnaik, c.j.1. this batch of writ petitions relates to allotment of bye products of bhilai steel plant as raw materials to different industries located in the state of chhattisgarh and were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.2. the facts briefly are that m/s. raysinet kemical co. and others filed a writ petition misc. petition no. 462 of 1981 in the high court of madhya pradesh at jabalpur before the state of chhattisgarh was constituted by the madhya pradesh reorganisation act, 2000 complaining of arbitrary distribution of by products of the bhilai steel plant as raw materials to different industries and by judgment and order dated 11-10-1984 the said batch of writ petitions were disposed of by the madhya pradesh high court with the direction that the director of industries, madhya pradesh, in the light of the discussion in the order, will evolve a reasonable formula and allot the raw materials available in the light of the formula to the 13 industrial units.3. pursuant to the said directions of the madhya pradesh high court in the judgment and order dated 11-10-1984 passed in misc. petition no. 462 of 1981, the industries commissioner, government of madhya pradesh, by order dated 30-11-1984 constituted a four members committee (hereinafter referred to as the 'first committee') headed by additional director of industries, burg and after considering the factors mentioned in the judgment and order dated 11-10-1984 of the madhya .....
Tag this Judgment!