Loop - Judgment Search Results
Loop Telecom And Trading Limited Vs. Union Of India
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-03-2022
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos. 1447-1467 of 2016 Loop Telecom and Trading Limited …Appellant Versus Union of India and Anr. …Respondents And With Civil Appeal No.893 of
In Re: Loop Mobile Holdings India Ltd. Vs.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-07-2010
Reported in: [2010]100SCL37(Kar)
dated 1-6-1995 and yet again to BPL Communications Limited on 14-7-2000 and thereafter to the present name i.e. Loop Mobile Holdings India Limited, on 21-5-2009, by securing the fresh certificate of incorporation. The address of the registered
M/S. Loop Telecom Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Another
Court: Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT
Decided on: Sep-12-2012
issued by TERM Cell clearly mentioning the dates of registration as 27.1.2010 are enclosed for your ready reference. Loop has, therefore, registered with the TERM Cell for coverage testing of at least 10% of the DHQs within
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Loop Mobile (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-15-2012
Matched in: Parties Loop Mobile (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane
Loop Mobile Ltd. Vs. Bharti Airtel Limited and Others
Court: Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
Matched in: Parties Loop Mobile Ltd. Vs. Bharti Airtel Limited and Others
Loop Telecom Limited, (Delhi) and Others Vs. Union of India and Anothe ...
Court: Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
Matched in: Parties Loop Telecom Limited, (Delhi) and Others Vs. Union of India and Another
Smt. Sunder Bai and Another Vs. Loop Singh and Others
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Jun-28-2011
Matched in: Parties Smt. Sunder Bai and Another Vs. Loop Singh and Others
Mulankuzha Pakkil Pnnimattom Chingavanom Loop Road Vikasana Samithi vs ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Sep-30-2022
1944 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 41283/2017 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONERS: 1 MULANKUZHA PAKKIL PNNIMATTOM CHINGAVANOM LOOP ROAD VIKASANA SAMITHI, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, MR. GEORGE K.THAKARAN, THARAKAN HOUSE, PAKKIL P.O, KOTTAYAM-686 012. 2 MR. KORAH
Surendran vs Mulankuzha - Pakkil - Pannimattom - Chingavanom Loop Road ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Sep-30-2022
PAKKIL P.O., KOTTAYAM- 686 012 BY ADV K.SANDESH RAJA RESPONDENTS: 1 MULANKUZHA - PAKKIL - PANNIMATTOM - CHINGAVANOM LOOP ROAD VIKASANA SAMITHI THROUGH ITS SECRETARY MR.GEORGE K.THARAKAN, THARAKAN HOUSE, PAKKIL P.O., KOTTAYAM- 686 012 ..2.. 2 KORAH
Mulankuzha - Pakkil - Pannimattom - Chingavanam Loop Road Vikasana Sam ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jul-23-2020
23RD DAY OF JULY 2020 / 1ST SRAVANA, 1942 PETITIONERS: 1 MULANKUZHA - PAKKIL - PANNIMATTOM - CHINGAVANOM LOOP ROAD VIKASANA SAMITHI, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY MR.GEORGE K.THARAKAN, THARAKAN HOUSE, PAKKIL P.O, KOTTAYAM- 686 012. 2 MR.KORAH ABRAHAM,
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free