LORD EVERSHED M. R. These four cases have raised a single points for our consideration, which may be stated as follows : Where a company, which carries on the trade or business of property dealing, receives...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Nov 20 2003

Liverpool and London S.P. and I Asson. Ltd. Vs. M.V. Sea Success I and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-20-2003

Reported in: JT2003(9)SC218; 2003(10)SCALE1; (2004)9SCC512; MANU/SC/0951/2003

support of the said contention, strong reliance has been placed on Queen v. Judge of the City of London Court 1891 1 QB 273, The Beldis 1936 P. 51, Webster v. Seekamp 1821 43 & Ald 352,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 1999

Cwt Vs. London Star Diamond Co. (i) (P) Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-13-1999

Reported in: [2002]122TAXMAN110(SC)

Special leave granted.After hearing the learned senior counsels for the parties, in our opinion, a question of law does arise. We, therefore, direct the Tribunal to state the case and refer the following question of law...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 1963

London Rubber Co. Ltd. Vs. Durex Products

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-04-1963

Reported in: AIR1963SC1882; [1964]2SCR211

demonstrating insertion of diaphragms, vaginaljellies, applicators for vaginal jellies and surgical lubricatingjellies.' Its claim is disputed by the London Rubber Co., Ltd., London,the appellant before us by lodging an opposition to the registration on March29, 1951. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 10 2014

Jeyaraman @ London Jeyaraman Vs. The State Rep.By

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-10-2014

COURT DATED :10. 12.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12122 of 2014 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2014 Jeyaraman @ London Jeyaraman ... Petitioner -Vs- The State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Kumbakonam East Police Station, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2003

Liverpool and London, Steamship Protection and Indemnity Assocn. Ltd. ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-22-2003

Reported in: AIR2003Bom417; 2003(3)ALLMR920; 2003(5)BomCR319; 2003(4)MhLj708

ordered to be arrested with a view to secure the plaintiffs claim in the arbitration proceedings instituted in London.'The amount as claimed and or cause shown, is that policy of insurance was made on the terms that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 16 2005

Liverpool and London Steamship Protection and Indemnity Association Lt ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-16-2005

Reported in: 2005(4)ALLMR17; 2005(6)BomCR278; 2005(3)MhLj1050

S.U. Kamdar, J.1. The present motion has been taken out for the appointment of Commissioner for recording evidence in the suit as also it has been prayed that the evidence of one witness namely Ms. Lynn...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2003

Liverpool and London Steamship Protection and Indeminity Association L ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-30-2003

Reported in: 2003(3)ARBLR537(Bom); 2003(6)BomCR275

No. 13 of 2002 granted part relief. There are also arbitral proceedings which are presently going on at London. The plaintiffs have framed rules which are known as Liverpool and London Steamship Protection and Indeminity Association Limited.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

‹ Prev
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Next ›
Last »

Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days

Londonize - Judgment Search Results

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.