Lok Sabha - Judgment Search Results
Justice (Retd.) Markandey Katju Vs. The Lok Sabha and Anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-15-2016
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.504 OF2015Justice (Retd.) Markandey Katju ……Petitioner Versus The Lok Sabha & Anr. …. Respondents JUDGMENT Uday Umesh Lalit J.This petition under Article 32 seeks quashing of Resolution dated … Article 32 seeks quashing of Resolution dated 11.03.2015 passed by Rajya Sabha and Resolution dated 12.03.2015 passed by Lok Sabha. In the alternative, it is also prayed that the Houses of Parliament be directed to give to the
Lily Thomas (Ms), Advocate Vs. Speaker, Lok Sabha and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-24-1993
Reported in: JT1993(4)SC646; 1993(3)SCALE543; (1993)4SCC234; [1993]Supp1SCR791
the Motion of Impeachment against Mr. Justice v. Ramaswami, a sitting judge of this Court moved in the Lok Sabha seeking to, remove him from the office of Judge, should be deemed to have been carried by construing … vote. In 'Practice and Procedure of Parliament' by M.N. Kaul and S.L. Shakdher the procedure of voting in Lok Sabha is described thus,Under the automatic vote recorder system, each member casts his vote from the seat allotted to
S.P. Yadav and Ors. Vs. Lok Sabha and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-2015
+ W.P.(C) No.162/2013 7th January, 2015 % S.P. YADAV AND ORS. Through: ......Petitioners Mr. K. Venkatraman, Advocate. VERSUS LOK SABHA & Anr. Through: ...... Respondents Ms. Maninder Acharya, Senior Advocate with Mr. Yashish Chandra, Advocate. CORAM: HON’BLE MR.
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Vipul Kumr Vs. Lok Sabha Secretariat and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-02-2013
2nd September, 2013 VIPUL KUMR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Gyanendra Singh, Advocate with Mr. Yogesh Kumar, Advocate. Versus LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be … allotted 6 marks, what was 'desirable' was having the NCC/Sports or Computer course certificate. It was for the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha Secretariat to decide what qualifications they expected in the Security Assistants. They did want persons
R. Kothandaraman Vs. Lok Sabha Secretariat
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2014
R. KOTHANDARAMAN Through : ..... Appellant Mr. R.K. Saini, Mr. Vivja Nigpal and Mr. Ayush Arora, Advs. versus LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Pramod Gupta, Mr. Umakant Kataria and Ms. Yogita Verma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE … Single Judge. An application dated 6th of June, 2008 by the petitioner seeking to voluntarily retire from the Lok Sabha Secretariat under Rule 48 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 has generated the present litigation. After it stood
Subhash Chandra Agarwal vs.lok Sabha Secretariat & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2019
2019 Date of decision:02. d July, 2019 SUBHASH CHANDRA AGARWAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. T. Sudhakar, Advocate. versus LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Advocate with Ms. Gauri Puri, Advocate and Mr.Anand Venkatramani, … („CIC‟, for short) dismissing the second appeal preferred by him and order dated 26.03.2013 made by the Secretariat, Lok Sabha, thereby denying certain information sought on the ground that furnishing it would amount to „breach of privilege‟ of
Manmohan Singh Narula & Anr vs.speaker, Lok Sabha
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2019
& CM APPL. 28645/2019 MANMOHAN SINGH NARULA & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Manmohan Singh Narula versus SPEAKER, LOK SABHA Through: None ..... Respondent CORAM:-"HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR % D.N.PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE … the respondents for issuing directions, orders or to frame a policy for appointment of Leader of Opposition of Lok Sabha; (ii) Or to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts
VipIn Kumar Mittal Vs. Lok Sabha Secretariat
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-06-2011
in the annual confidential reports [„ACRs], the Petitioner, who was working as a Research Assistant [„RA] in the Lok Sabha Secretariat [„LSS], filed the present writ petition. Apart from seeking the quashing of these adverse entries in the … states that in 1974, in exercise of the powers conferred by Rule 4(2) and Rule 5 of the Lok Sabha Secretariat (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1955 [„Rules], the Speaker made an order dated 1st December 1974,
Subhash Baloda and ors. Vs. Lok Sabha Secretariat and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-01-2011
unsuccessful in being selected to the thirty-seven vacancies in the post of Security Assistant Grade-II („SAG-II) in the Lok Sabha Secretariat (Respondent No.1) and nineteen vacancies in that post in the Rajya Sabha Secretariat (Respondent No. 2) have … in case of physically handicapped persons of relevant disability and category for appointment against the vacancies reserved in Lok Sabha Secretariat for physically handicapped persons. These percentages are the minimum marks which a candidate is required to secure
R. Kothandaraman Vs. the Speaker, Lok Sabha Secretariat and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
R. KOTHANDARAMAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K.Saini, Adv. with Mr. R. Kothandaraman, petitioner in person. versus THE SPEAKER, LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya with Mr. Varun Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE … same to be urged.2. The facts of the case are that the petitioner joined the services of the Lok Sabha Secretariat on 25.2.1982. The petitioner went on deputation to the Goa Legislative Assembly from years 2000 to 2002
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free