Logically - Judgment Search Results

State Bank of India Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: 2009(57)BLJR2769

d n patel j 1 the present writ petition has been preferred mainly against a decision rendered by permanent lok...

Bhuwalka Steel Indus. Ltd. Vs. Bombay Iron and Steel Labour Bd. and an ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2010(1)BomCR656; JT2009(15)SC269; (2010)ILLJ561SC; 2009(14)SCALE623; (2010)2SCC273; 2009(10)LC5041(SC)

..... ordinarily not fall within the purview of the definition carrying the logic further the bench held that by the inclusive part the definition ..... or under agreement with the employer or contractor on the same logic the bench went on to hold that once the act defines ..... ramanatha aiyer 3rd edn 2005 vol 4 p 4456 the underlying logic of the doctrine is to maintain consistency and avoid uncertainty the .....

Fcc Vs. Fox Television Stations, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... increase in fleeting expletives seems to us an exercise in logic rather than clairvoyance the court of appeals was perhaps correct ..... between media have been dubious from their infancy indeed the logical weakness of red lion and pacifica has been apparent for ..... antithesis of the arbitrary this means agencies must follow a logical and rational decisionmaking process allentown mack sales service inc v .....

Gurleen Kaur and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR2009NOC2988(F.B)(P&H)

..... dharmaya tatwan nihitan guhayan mahajano jein gatah sa pantha mahabharta aranyakaparvan 313 117 formal logic is vascillating srutis are contradictory there is no single rishi whose opinion is ..... fables etc of religion when clubbed together constitute a religious consciousness irrespective of the logical acceptability of some of these characteristics no religion allows its consciousness to be invaded .....

Gyanendra Tripathi Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 2009(4)MPHT155

..... decision is its ratio and not every observation found therein nor what logically follows from the various observations made in it on this topic ..... is only an authority for what it actually decides and not what logically follows from it 12 in bhavnagar university v palitana sugar mill ..... can be quoted for a proposition that may seem to follow logically from it such a mode of reasoning assumes that the law .....

R (on the Application of E) (Respondent) Vs. Governing Body of Jfs and ...

Court: UK Supreme Court

..... his ethnic origin as lord kerr explains there can be no logical distinction between treating a person less favourably because he does have ..... my view as i have already indicated that the adjudicator should logically have gone further by recognising criteria 2 and 3 as involving ..... formed part of his ethnic origins could surely not be challenged logically therefore the absence of such a feature from m s .....

Yeager Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... impugn the legitimacy of jury verdicts that on their face were logically inconsistent shows a fortiori that a potentially inconsistent hung count ..... 1932 the court speaking through justice holmes held that a logical inconsistency between a guilty verdict and a verdict of acquittal ..... upon which an acquittal must have been based would also logically require an acquittal on the hung count all that can .....

Madhao S/O Atulchandra Bapat Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through Its ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2009(4)BomCR32

..... is only an authority for what it actually decides and not what logically follows from it 16 in bhavnagar university v palitana sugar mill ..... decision is an authority of what it actually decides and not what logically follows from it similarly a little difference in facts or additional ..... be quoted for a proposition that may seem to follow logically from it such a mode of reasoning assumes that the law .....

Jag NaraIn and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2009CriLJ3833

..... is only an authority for what it actually decides and not what logically follows from it 20 the hon ble apex court has held in ..... case is only an authority for what it actually decides and not what logically follows from it 23 in bhavnagar university v palittana sugar mills pvt ..... can be quoted for a proposition that may seem to follow logically from it such a mode of reasoning assumes that the law is .....

Bank of India and anr. Vs. K. Mohandas and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2009(5)SC247; (2009)IIILLJ609SC; (2009)5MLJ807(SC); 2009(4)SCALE596; (2009)5SCC313; 2009(3)SLJ493(SC)

..... decision is its ratio and not every observation found therein nor what logically follows from the various observations made in it 45 in the ..... is only an authority for what it actually decides and not what logically follows from it 47 in bhavnagar university v palitana sugar mill ..... can be quoted for a proposition that may seem to follow logically from it such a mode of reasoning assumes that the law .....