Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Lithographs - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial to open GPT-powered briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results — plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 24 2001

Headway Lithographic Co. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on: Sep-24-2001

1. For hearing the present appeal, the appellants, M/s. Headway Lithographic Co. were required to predeposit the duty amount of Rs.


Jan 14 2003

Headway Lithographic Co. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on: Jan-14-2003

Reported in: (2003)(88)ECC17

1. This appeal is directed against order in original No. 166/2000 dated 20.4.2001 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise...


Jun 18 2007

Saffire Lithographers and Adarsh Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Jun-18-2007

Reported in: (2007)(120)ECC348

1. M/s. Saffire Lithographers Limited, (henceforth also referred to as assessee, importer or appellant)


Turn these results into brief-ready notes

May 23 2014

Fu Loong Lithographer Pte Ltd. and Others Vs. Mok Wai Hoe and Another

Court: Singapore Supreme Court

Decided on: May-23-2014

("the Judge"); this decision of the Judge (see Fu Loong Lithographer Pte Ltd and others v Mok Wai Hoe and another


May 29 1911

American Lithographic Co. Vs. Werckmeister

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-29-1911

American Lithographic Co. v. Werckmeister - 221 U.S. 603 (1911) U.S. Supreme


Dec 23 1889

Forbes Lithograph Mfg. Co. Vs. Worthington

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-23-1889

the purpose of ornament. Equally with engravings, copper plates, and lithographs, they are printed and properly fall within the statutory designation


Mar 17 1884

Burrow-giles Lithographic Company Vs. Sarony

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-17-1884

Burrow-Giles Lithographic Company v. Sarony - 111 U.S. 53 (1884) U.S. Supreme


May 06 2002

Punjab and Sind Bank Vs. Himachal Lithographers and ors.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Decided on: May-06-2002

Reported in: III(2003)BC521

R.L. Khurana, J.1. In execution of the decree dated 13.8.1984 passed in Civil Suit No. 37 of 1984, the house...


Feb 02 1903

BleisteIn Vs. Donaldson Lithographing Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-02-1903

Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co. - 188 U.S. 239 (1903) U.S. Supreme Court Bleistein


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

Try AI Brief & Semantic Search — 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial