Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Liquor - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 12 2001

Kerala Liquor Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jul-12-2001

Reported in: (2001)170CTR(SC)183; [2001]251ITR11(SC)

Matched in: Parties Kerala Liquor Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax


Nov 08 2006

Usha Liquors Private Limited and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

Decided on: Nov-08-2006

Katriar, J.8. I agree. Bihar Excise Act, 1915-Section 22-Grant of exclusive privilege of manufacture and wholesale supply of liquor-Petitioners not complying with conditions-Consequently privilege granted to them remained ineffective and inoperative-Forfeiture of secutity deposit submitted in form


Jul 07 2009

Chandra Prasad Liquor Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Chhattisgarh

Decided on: Jul-07-2009

Reported in: (2009)227CTR(NULL)409

Matched in: Parties Chandra Prasad Liquor Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 22 2009

K.D. Liquor and Fertilizer (Pvt.) Ltd. Through Its Authorised Represen ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jan-22-2009

Reported in: [2009(1)JCR616(Jhr)]

direction on the respondents to charge license fee @ Rs. 1/- per L.P. litre in respect of country liquor for the extended period upto 30.6.2005 and/or adjust the excess amount of license fee paid during the extended


Aug 03 2006

Liquor King and Mount Shivalik Brewaries Ltd. Vs. the State of Jharkha ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Aug-03-2006

Reported in: [2006(4)JCR343(Jhr)]

the learned Single Judge, whereby and whereunder the writ petitions preferred by them were rejected.3. The appellant, M/s Liquor King, Palamau (LPA No. 191 of 2006) has challenged the order contained in Memo No. 319 dated 26th


Aug 04 2006

Keerthi Liquors Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Aug-04-2006

Reported in: (2009)20VST336(Ker)

made effective from April 1, 1992 after retaining turnover tax at all points on items like, petrol, foreign liquor, etc., provided that items not mentioned in Sub-clauses (a) to (f) of the notification and falling under the


Feb 16 2015

Kumar's Liquors and Beers Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. BDA Limited and An ...

Court: Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on: Feb-16-2015

183/1997 was filed by the appellant in First Appeal No. 282/2000 and First Appeal No. 283/2000, namely, Kumar's Liquors and Beers Private Limited [hereinafter referred to as “Kumar Liquors”], claiming refund of security deposit of Rs. 1,00,00,000/-


Jun 20 1995

Bhanu Liquor Shop, Banuvalli Village, Harihar Taluk Vs. State of Karna ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-20-1995

Reported in: 2000(5)KarLJ512

licensees holding CL. 2 and CL. 9 licences issued under the Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquor) Rules, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the rules'). The licences are granted for the duration of the excise


Feb 20 1998

Liquors India Limited Vs. Govt. of A.P. and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Feb-20-1998

Reported in: 1998(2)ALD741; 1998(3)ALT193

ORDERD. Reddeppa Reddi, J.1. The petitioners in these three writ petitions are manufacturers of Indian Made Liquor (IML). The common point for our consideration in these petitions is whether the respondents are entitled to demand


Aug 08 1996

Sovereign Liquor Distributors Vs. State Excise Superintendent and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Aug-08-1996

Reported in: 1997(2)ALT433

have to be imported within 90 days, the extension was obtained. However, even during the extension period, the liquor was not released and the Distillery could not make any supply to the petitioner. Accordingly, the non-supply certificate


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial