Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Linotype - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 16 1972

Linotype and Machinery Limited Vs. the Commercial Tax Officer and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jun-16-1972

Reported in: [1973]32STC246(Cal)

petitioner is a company incorporated in England. It has its works at Altringham, Cheshire, England and it manufactures linotype machines at its said works. The petitioner claims that its office at Calcutta is a branch office. On


Jun 14 1916

Linotype and Machinery Co. and Windsor Press

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jun-14-1916

Reported in: 37Ind.Cas.175

Matched in: Parties Linotype and Machinery Co. and Windsor Press


Jan 05 1920

Morganthaler Linotype Co. Vs. Davis

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-05-1920

Morganthaler Linotype Co. v. Davis - 251 U.S. 256 (1920) U.S. Supreme Court Morganthaler Linotype Co. v. Davis, 251 U.S.


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 03 1989

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Linotype and Machinery Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jul-03-1989

Reported in: [1991]192ITR337(Cal)

Matched in: Parties Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Linotype and Machinery Ltd.


Mar 10 1980

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Linotype and Machinery Co. Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Mar-10-1980

Reported in: AIR1981Cal103

Matched in: Parties Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Linotype and Machinery Co. Ltd.


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial