Limitation Act - Judgment Search Results
“6. Article 137 of the Limitation Act Applies in the Facts of the Vs ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-20-2013
for respondents No.2 & 3. ***** G.S.Sandhawalia J.CM No.18323 of 2012 Application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 read with Section 151 CPC for condonation of delay of 98 days in filing the review petition … para No.11 of the writ petition itself, plea had been taken that as per Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, the prescribed period of limitation for enforcing the liability of the surety is three years and the
Phoenix Arc Private Limited Acting in Its Capacity as Trustee of Phoen ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:20. 09.2018 CONT.CAS.(C) 485/2016 PHOENIX ARC PRIVATE LIMITED ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE OF PHOENIX TRUST FY- 16-15 ........ Petitioner versus PAWAN TANWAR & ORS … THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:20. 09.2018 CONT.CAS.(C) 485/2016 PHOENIX ARC PRIVATE LIMITED ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE OF PHOENIX TRUST FY- 16-15 ........ Petitioner versus PAWAN TANWAR & ORS ........
Stanford International Bank Limited (Acting by Its Joint Liquidators) ...
Court: UK Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-15-2012
to appeal to this court. 2. Sections 40 and 41 in Part 2 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 ("POCA") make provision for restraint orders over property in circumstances where a criminal investigation or proceeding is
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free