Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Lie - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 06 1917

Lie Vs. San Francisco and Portland S.S. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-06-1917

Lie v. San Francisco & Portland S.S. Co. - 243 U.S. 291 (1917) U.S. Supreme Court Lie v. San


May 23 1898

United States Vs. Lies

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-23-1898

United States v. Lies - 170 U.S. 628 (1898) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Lies, 170 U.S. 628 (1898) United States


Feb 22 2011

Bharti Singh Vs. Friend Lies Estate and Essentials Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Bihar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Patna

Decided on: Feb-22-2011

President: 1. The complaint by Smt. Bharti Singh has been filed seeking a direction to the O.P.-M/s. Friend Lies Estate and Essentials Pvt. Ltd. for allotment of flat No. E on the 6th Floor in Block-B of


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 01 2013

Brother Pohap Singh Was Lying in His Varandha of His House. Vs. Balbir ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Apr-01-2013

CRM-A No.109-MA of 2013 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-A No.109-MA of 2013 Date of decision :1. 4.2013 Balbir Singh @ Ballu ........Applicant-appellant versus State of Haryana and another...


Feb 18 2013

“19. the Dead Body of Suman Was Found Lying in the Vs. State of Hary ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-18-2013

CRM-A No.969-MA of 2012 (O &M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM-A No.969-MA of 2012 (O & M) Date of decision :18. 2.2013 Sunil Kumar ........Applicant-appellant versus State of...


Apr 23 2003

Madhur Industries Ltd. Incorporated Under the Companies Act, 1956 Vs. ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-23-2003

Reported in: AIR2003Bom330; 2003(4)ALLMR551; 2003(5)BomCR534; 2003(3)MhLj841

be read to mean in all cases and is not restricted to those cases where an Appeal only lies. Ultimately these are procedural provisions in aid of justice. The purpose of the amendment was to end the


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial