Legislation - Judgment Search Results

M.K. Stalin, Leader of Opposition and Member of Legislative Assembly V ...

Court: Chennai

of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the first respondent pertaining to S.O.Ms.No.108, Legislative Assembly Secretariat, dated 22.08.2016, quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to place the fifth respondent

Shri Filipe Nery Rodrigues, Member of the Legislative Assembly of Goa ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2006(2)BomCR424; (2006)108BOMLR227

exercising power conferred on him under Clause 6(1) of the Tenth Schedule. The said rules are, therefore, subordinate legislation, procedural in nature and cannot be equated to or given the constitutional status of the provisions contained in

Speaker, Orissa Legislative Assembly. Vs. Utkal Keshari ParidA.

Court: Supreme Court of India

effect to the provisions of the Tenth Schedule, the Rules framed under such powers would amount to delegated legislation which cannot override the substantive provisions of the Constitution contained in the Schedule itself. The provisions of Sub-Rules

Speaker, Orissa Legislative Assembly Vs. Utkal Keshari Parida

Court: Supreme Court of India

effect to the provisions of the Tenth Schedule, the Rules framed under such powers would amount to delegated legislation which cannot override the substantive provisions of the Constitution contained in the Schedule itself. The provisions of Sub-

Rajasthan Legislative Assembly Secretariat Officers' Association and O ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1985(1)WLN129

of the learned Single Judge dated January 25, 1984, dismissing the writ petition No. 2037/82.2. The petitioners Rajasthan Legislative Assembly Secretariat Officers Association (here in after referred to as 'the Officer's Association') and Shri B. Goswami, Deputy

Speaker, Legislative Assembly Vs. Abdul Jabbar Sheikh Hassan-ud-dIn Ba ...

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: AIR1985J& K1

--'Whether the allegations contained in the complaint of Sardar Rafiq Hussain Khan dated 3-7-1984, addressed to the Speaker Legislative Assembly attract the provisions of Section 24-G of the Representation of the People Act? If so, what is

Ajit Mohan Vs. Legislative Assembly, National Capital Territory Of Del ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

dynamism of the platform and its disruptive potential. A recent example has been Australia’s effort to formulate a legislation that would require Facebook to pay publishers for using their news stories. The law was seen as a

Ashish Shelar Vs. The Maharashtra Legislative Assembly

Court: Supreme Court of India

the Crown is supreme and its powers are unlimited and courts have no power of judicial review of legislation.” (emphasis supplied) The Court then noted that this doctrine is in one sense the doctrine of ultra vires

Gyanendra Kumar Singh And Ors. Etc Vs. Bihar Legislative Assembly Patn ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 5463-5464 OF2015GYANDENDRA KUMAR & ORS. Appellants VERSUS BIHAR LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, PATNA & ANR. ETC. Respondents ORDER The instant appeals arise out of the order of disqualification issued

Dr. Sunil Kumar Singh versus Bihar Legislative Council (Through Secret ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2025] 2 S.C.R. 2130

retained its two standards of strict scrutiny and rational basis scrutiny, when adjudicating challenges to State or Federal Legislation. 53. For the purposes of the present discussion, we will limit our analysis to the strict scrutiny test,