Legal Right - Judgment Search Results

Legal Representatives of Gusai Karan Giri Vs. Legal Representatives of ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1999Raj65

heard is per se an attempt, on the part of the learned trial Court, to pre-empt the non-petitioners' right and in this background the learned counsel for the non-petitioners urges that there is no illegality committed by … was posted for decision on 31-10-1996. On 31-10-1996 the suit was finally adjudicated and decreed by the learned trial Court.3. An application under Order 9, Rule 13, C.P.C. was referred by the non-petitioners before the trial Court.

Legal Representatives of Manohar (Smt. Shamlata Wd/O Manohar Raut, Vij ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR2008Bom155; 2008(2)ALLMR743; 2008(3)BomCR166

to be an ancestral, plaintiffs have placed on record two important documents. They are Exh.60 the record of rights. The area of the plaintiffs' land is shown to be 124.2 sq.meter. In the said record of right. … the said measurement. The defendant, therefore, prayed that the suit be dismissed. 3. The learned judge of the trial court framed issues and found that the plaintiff is the owner of the site ABCDEFGH and defendant had

Lachhman Singh (Deceased) Through Legal Representatives and ors. Vs. H ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008(3)AWC2635(SC); 2008(3)CTC541; JT2008(7)SC129; (2008)7MLJ481(SC); 2008(8)SCALE220; (2008)5SCC444; 2008(4)LH(SC)2392

is 1913 - Suit filed in 1970 - Thus, suit filed within limitation period - Secondly, respondents has right to adduce additional evidence and there application must be allowed - Thus, appeal allowed, matter remitted back to … suit for redemption of the said mortgage was filed by the respondents on or about 30.12.1970. The learned trial court, as also the First Appellate Court, dismissed the said suit as being barred by limitation opining that

R. Rajagopal Reddy and ors. (Deceased by Legal Representatives) Vs. Pa ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1996SC238a; 1995(2)ALT1(SC); 1995(1)CTC568; [1995]213ITR340(SC); JT1995(2)SC667; 1995(1)SCALE692; (1995)2SCC630

land for arrears of revenue in the Lower Provinces under the Bengal Presidency), Section 36."9. Therefore, it was legal right of the plaintiff to contend in those days that even though the transfer of the property had been … 82 if the Indian Trusts Act which gave almost for a period of a century or more a legal right to the real owner to claim against the purported owner that the consideration paid was by the real

Smt. Sunita Chawla (Legal Heirs of Late Sh. Gulshan Chawla) & Ors. vs ...

Court: Delhi

Sr. Advocate with Mr. Kunal Mittal, Mr. Sachin Aggarwal, Ms. Arpita Rawat, Advs.versusMRS. KRISHNA CHAWLA (SINCE DECEASED)THROUGH HER LEGAL HEIRS & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sachhin Puri, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Harshit Sharma, Mr. Krishna Shukla, Mr. … defendants which are defendant nos. 3 and 5,who are substituted in place of mother, would only get a right to contest the suit, and the said substitution would not amount to declaration of any rights of the

Tukaram Hari Shevale, Vs. Smt. Laxmibai Vishnu Kulkarni (Since Decease ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2006(5)BomCR45; 2006(5)MhLj390

and by the following observations, by the Special Deputy Collector: The effect of this order, subject to further legal proceedings, if any, would be that the tenants have become the deemed purchasers on the postponed day and … after hearing the parties concerned including the LRs of the original landlady held that the tenants acquired the right under Section 32 to purchase the land on 18/11/1969 and which happened to subsist till 17/11/1970 when they

Yeshwant Rambhau Chondhe Since Deceased Through His Legal Heirs Tanaji ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2007(5)ALLMR554; 2007(5)BomCR335

Shinde. Since the petitioners-plaintiffs are in continuous possession of the same.e. The respondents 1 to 3 are the legal heirs of the deceased Tarabai while respondents 4 to 10 are the legal heirs of the deceased Bhikoba.f. … property to the petitioners-plaintiffs. It was agreed that the said late Rambhau Haribhau Chondhe would surrender his tenancy rights for effecting the sale.d. The possession of the suit property was to be given to the petitioners-plaintiffs by

Shri Madhukar Krishna Dhusane Vs. Smt. Mandabai Hari Choudhari (Since ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(4)ALLMR480; 2008(6)BomCR109; (2008)110BOMLR1992; 2008(5)MhLj470

Matched in: Parties Shri Madhukar Krishna Dhusane Vs. Smt. Mandabai Hari Choudhari (Since Deceased Through Her Legal Heirs and Representatives Shri Suresh Hari Choudhari, Sou Nirmala Bhagwat Choudhari and Shri Raju Hari Choudhari)

Mahadev Pandurang Kambekar (Since Deceased Through His Heirs and Legal ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(1)ALLMR360; 2007(5)BomCR726

of jural or contractual relationship and enforcement of such rights and obligations the parties are described by the legal character they bear. Thus, Section 108 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, which deals with the rights … tenancy to his tenant. If a licensor or a landlord wants to recover possession of the property, his right to do so arises only on the termination of the licence or the tenancy, as the case may

AlimoddIn Faizuddin, Deceased Through His Legal Representatives Shamsh ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2009(111)BomLR3378

P.R. Borkar, J.1. This is a second appeal preferred by legal representatives of original Plaintiff Alimoddin, being aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed by the learned III Additional … whether the District Court committed an error in allowing the appeal and dismissing the suit holding that no right of easement by prescription is proved by the plaintiffs and my answer to the said question of law