Leed - Judgment Search Results
Lockhart Vs. Leeds
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-05-1904
Lockhart v. Leeds - 195 U.S. 427 (1904) U.S. Supreme Court Lockhart v. Leeds, 195 U.S. 427 (1904) Lockhart v. Leeds
Leeds Vs. Marine Insurance Company of Alexandria
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1817
Leeds v. Marine Insurance Company of Alexandria - 15 U.S. 380 (1817) U.S. Supreme Court Leeds v. Marine Insurance
Leeds Vs. Marine Insurance Company
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1821
Leeds v. Marine Insurance Company - 19 U.S. 565 (1821) U.S. Supreme Court Leeds v. Marine Insurance Company, 19
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Leeds Kem Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Sep-01-2000
Reported in: (2001)(134)ELT294TriDel
1 M/s. Leeds Kem (hereinafter referred to as 'the assessees') were engaged in the manufacture of products including "plantozyme" which was
Leeds Kem Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. and Cus.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-02-2001
Reported in: (2001)(129)ELT548Tri(Mum.)bai
demand of Rs. 98,899/- and Rs. 25,21,385/- and imposed penalty of Rs. 5 lakhs on the applicants M/s. Leeds Kem.Penalties have been levied on other co-noticees under Rule 209A of the Central Excise Rules. Hence, the appeals.2.
Leeds and CatlIn Co. Vs. Victor Talking Machine Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-19-1909
Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking Machine Co. - 213 U.S. 301 (1909) U.S. Supreme Court Leeds &
Leeds and CatlIn Co. Vs. Victor Talking Machine Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-19-1909
Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking Machine Co. - 213 U.S. 325 (1909) U.S. Supreme Court Leeds &
Brown Vs. Wygant and Leeds
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-25-1898
Brown v. Wygant & Leeds - 163 U.S. 618 (1898) U.S. Supreme Court Brown v. Wygant & Leeds, 163 U.S. 618 (1896) Brown
parties : a (Appellant) Vs. Hoare (Respondent), C (Fc) (Appellant) Vs. ...
Court: House of Lords
Decided on: Jan-30-2008
appellants the agreed sums of damages. 30. That leaves the appeal in Young v Catholic Care (Diocese of Leeds) and the Home Office. The claimant alleges sexual abuse by employees at two separate institutions: first, between October
Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Hounslow (Respondents) Vs ...
Court: UK Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-23-2011
the occupier is not a secure tenant under Part IV of the Housing Act 1985. Two of them, Leeds City Council v Hall ("Hall") and Birmingham City Council v Frisby ("Frisby"), are cases where the claims for
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free