Skip to content

Learned - Judgment Search Results

Aug 22 2016

The Principal Indian School of Learning Vs. Indian School of Learning ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Aug-22-2016

is not a party in the connected writ petition.2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.3. In order to address the grievances


Mar 07 2003

Shri V.S. Gajul, Being Ex-junior Clerk, Working in the Court of the Le ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-07-2003

Reported in: 2003(3)ALLMR847; 2003(4)BomCR516

necessitating the filing of present writ petition.3. Mr. Sanjay Kshirsagar, learned counsel for the petitioner, principally raised two contentions before us.


Jan 18 2007

Open Learning Systems and Gourimani Sahoo and ors. Vs. State of Orissa ...

Court: Orissa

Decided on: Jan-18-2007

Reported in: 104(2007)CLT81

We have carefully perused the said files produced by the Learned Government Advocate, before us. From the various orders passed by


Aug 10 2011

Phi Learning Private Limited Vs. Dr. (Mrs.) P. Meenakshi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-10-2011

in terms of clause 4 of the agreement. 11. The learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff states that in fact even


Jan 13 2012

After Hearing Learned Counsel for Vs. Weeks. the

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-13-2012

till the date of payment..3. On 14th December 2005 the learned Arbitrator in an application filed under Section 33 of the


Apr 01 2013

“learned Counsel Inter-alia Contended That the Name of the Petitione ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Apr-01-2013

the petition was issued to the State.3. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, going through the record with their


Feb 08 2013

“learned State Counsel on Instructions from Asi Racchpal Sigh Vs. St ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-08-2013

the petition was issued to the State.3. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, going through the record with their


Aug 08 2013

Learned Counsel for the Applicant-appellant Submitted That Vs. Daya Ra ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-08-2013

of the Collector, the landowners filed objections. On reference, the learned court below vide award dated 23.12.2000 determined the market value


Mar 02 2013

“learned Counsel Inter-alia Contended That Although No Indicated Off ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-02-2013

the petition was issued to the State.3. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, going through the record with their


Dec 18 2012

“learned Counsel for the Petitioner States That the Vs. the State of ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Dec-18-2012

been compromised by the parties. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to press the


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »




Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files Start your Free Trial