Lead To - Judgment Search Results

Indian Lead Ltd. Vs. R.L. Dalal and Co. Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2006(2)ARBLR399(Bom); 2006(2)MhLj260

this Court in its exercise of jurisdiction under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.6. This leads me to the second contention which has been advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner pertaining to

Leading Treadecom Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Swarnim Paaper and Traders Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

The Court : Leave is given to the petitioner to correct the scheme and the petition in accordance with paragraph 2[e][i] of the affidavit. Two usual observations/objections have been made by the Central Government in their...

Leading Loans Vs. D.L.Walton

Court: Kerala

Crl.L.P. 1051/2007 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED1710-2007 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC2251994 of C.J.M.,THRISSUR DATED1906-2002 APPELLANT/COMPLAINANT: ------------------------- LEADING LOANS, GURUVAYUR ROAD, P.O.KUNNAMKULAM-680 503, REPRESENTED BY MANAGING PARTNER, VINU P.GEORGE. BY ADV. SRI.D.KRISHNA PRASAD RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED Nos.5, 7

M/s. Leading Hotels, Goa represented herein by its P. Ravi Vs. Shri An ...

Court: Mumbai Goa

Oral Judgment: (F.M. Reis, J.) 1. Heard Shri Shivan Dessai, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, Ms. Norma Alwares, the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent nos.1 to 4 and Shri A. N. S. Nadkarni,...

M/s. Leading Hotels Vs. Anthony Mendes and Others

Court: Mumbai Goa

that âTime and again this Court has emphasised that such a course of action by a court cannot lead to a legally acceptable conclusion inasmuch as the manner of reaching the decision and the reasons therefor are sacrosanct

Dolf Leading Ltd. Vs. Vijay Cable Industries and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2001(60)DRJ616

ORDERJ.D. Kapoor, J.1. is 7966/2001 is an application under Order 37 rule 2 sub-rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC for decreeing the suit.2. This is a suit filed under the summary procedure of Order 37...

Indian Lead Private Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1988(16)ECC162; 1987(31)ELT688(Bom)

between December 1981 and February 1982, certain items of drained battery scrap and battery plate scrap all being lead scrap. The petitioners had to pay an additional duty under Section 3(1) of the Customs Tariff Act and

Indian Lead Private Limited and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1988(16)ECC157

S.P. Bharucha, J.1. The 1st petitioners manufacture lead and load alloys for which purpose they import lead scrap. Prior to 1st March, 1981 their imports were

Indian Lead Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.-i ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1988(16)ECC160

percentage of the value of the imported article. It is the contention of the petitioners that they imported lead scrap, the scrap not being a manufactured item, no excise duty would be leviable and, therefore, the petitioners

Indian Lead Private Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1989(19)ECC209; 1989(23)LC561(Bombay); 1988(38)ELT23(Bom)

filing of the present appeal may be stated.2. The appellants who are the original petitioners are manufacturers of lead products. In the course of their business, the appellants imported large quantities of lead scrap consisting of whole