Lea - Judgment Search Results
Lea Vs. Polk County Copper Company
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1858
Lea v. Polk County Copper Company - 62 U.S. 493 (1858) U.S. Supreme Court Lea v. Polk County Copper
Lea Vs. Kelly
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1841
Lea v. Kelly - 40 U.S. 213 (1841) U.S. Supreme Court Lea v. Kelly, 40 U.S. 15 Pet. 213
Lea Vs. Yard
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1804
LEA v. YARD - 4 U.S. 95 (1804) U.S. Supreme Court LEA v. YARD, 4 U.S. 95 (1804) 4
18-section briefs on any result in this list
West Co. Vs. Lea
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-22-1899
West Co. v. Lea - 174 U.S. 590 (1899) U.S. Supreme Court West Co. v. Lea, 174 U.S. 590 (1899) West Company
M/S Lea International Limited Vs. Assistant Director of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-03-2014
COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + INCOME TAX APPEAL No.17/2014 Date of decision:3. d September, 2014 M/S LEA INTERNATIONAL LIMITED ..... Appellant Through:Mr.Ved Jain & Mr. Pranjal Srivastava, Advocates. versus ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX .....
Lea BadIn Vs. Upendra Mohan Roy Choudhury and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-17-1934
Reported in: AIR1935Cal35
the clause, Courts in this, country have taken different views. So far as this Court is concerned the leading case on the point is that of Justices of the Peace of Calcutta v. Orient Gas Co. (1872)
His Holiness Shamar Rimpoche Vs. Lea Terhune and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2004
Reported in: AIR2005Delhi167; 2005(79)DRJ465
Mukul Mudgal, J.1. Issues which generate public debate often lead to articles and books which may be found defamatory and offensive by some and yet be held out
Paulappa Ramappa Vs. Lea Hangal
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-12-1906
Reported in: (1906)8BOMLR982
has brought a suit in the Court of the District Judge of Dharwar against his alleged wife one Lea Habgal who is described in the record as an idiot, by her guardian, the Nazir of the District
Her Majesty the Queen Vs. Jeffery Lea Hogg
Court: Canada Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-21-2014
Matched in: Parties Her Majesty the Queen Vs. Jeffery Lea Hogg
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. First Leasing Co. of India Ltd. (Cit V. ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-12-1996
Reported in: (1997)140CTR(Mad)218
32A.Held:The assessee is wholly using the plant or machinery for the purpose of his/its business which consists of leasing it to other parties. Sub-section (1) or (2) of section 32A does not require anywhere that the plant
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free