Laye - Judgment Search Results

Lay Vs. Lay

Court: US Supreme Court

Lay v. Lay - 248 U.S. 24 (1918) U.S. Supreme Court Lay v. Lay, 248 U.S. 24 (1918) Lay v. Lay No. 633 Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted November 4, 1918 Decided November 18, 1918...

Hy Lay Poultry Farms Vs. State of Haryana

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1977SC685; (1976)4SCC87

P.N. Bhagwati, J1. This is an appeal by special leave directed against the judgment of High Court of Punjab and Haryana rejecting a Writ Petition preferred by the appellants in limine without issuing a rule to...

Frito-lay India and ors. Vs. Guru Prasad Enterprises

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2004(29)PTC537(Del)

ORDERMukul Mudgal, J.1. This is the suit filed by the plaintiff for permanent injunction, restraining infringement of copyright, passing off, acts of unfair competition, damages, rendition of accounts, delivery up etc., in favor of the plaintiff...

Jupiter Lays Pvt.Ltd Vs. Commercial Tax Officer

Court: Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JANUARY 2013 11TH POUSHA 193 WP(C).No. 31068 of 2012 (G) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------- JUPITER LAYS PVT.LTD, OKKAL.P.O,...

Harijan Lay out Sudhar Samiti and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra an ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1997)99BOMLR434

B.U. Wahane, J.1. This writ petition is an apt example as to how the statutory object secure preservation of Environment and Development of the residential colonies shown in the Master Plan, sought to be achieved by...

Frito Lay India and ors. Vs. Shivdeep Food Products Pvt. Ltd. and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2003(67)DRJ370; 2003(26)PTC309(Del)

J.D. Kapoor, J.1. This is a suit for permanent injunction for restraining the defendants from using the 'KURRAM KURRAM' packaging with simitar expressions or any other packaging/expressions which is a substantial reproduction or colourable imitation of...

Frito-lay India and Another Vs. Amit Goswamy and Another

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1999VIAD(Delhi)653; 82(1999)DLT113

ORDERS.K. Mahajan, J.1. Plaintiff No.1 is a subsidiary of Pepsico India Holdings Limited which in turn is a subsidiary of plaintiff No. 2 Pepsico Inc., a corporation existing under the laws of the United States of...

Fritco-lay India and anr. Vs. Uncle Chipps Private Limited

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2000VAD(Delhi)874; 2000(2)ARBLR519(Delhi); 86(2000)DLT31; (2000)126PLR57

ORDERS.K. Agarwal, J.1. ADMIT. We heard Mr. P. Chidambaram, learned Senior Advocate for the appellant and Dr.A.M. Singhvi, learned senior advocate for the respondent and were taken through the record. 2. This appeal by appellants (plaintiffs)...

Hy-lay Poultry Farms Vs. the State of Haryana

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: [1985]58STC208(P& H)

G.C. Mital, J.1. M/s. Hy-Lay Poultry Farms, Karnal (hereinafter called the assessee), is a partnership concern which maintains a poultry farm in Village Kulwehri, District Karnal, Haryana State. Chickens of parent stock are reared by it...

Frito-lay India Vs. Commissioner of Cen. Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2007)(115)ECC367

1. The issue in this appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune who has confirmed duty demand of Rs. 11,28,46,060/- and imposed a penalty of Rs. 50 lakhs relates to classification of...