Lay - Judgment Search Results

Lay Vs. Lay

Court: US Supreme Court

Lay v. Lay - 248 U.S. 24 (1918) U.S. Supreme Court

Hy Lay Poultry Farms Vs. State of Haryana

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1977SC685; (1976)4SCC87

P.N. Bhagwati, J1. This is an appeal by special leave directed against the judgment of High Court of Punjab and...

Frito-lay India and ors. Vs. Guru Prasad Enterprises

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2004(29)PTC537(Del)

the plaintiff and against the defendant.2. Plaintiff No. 1, Frito Lay India is a company established under the Indian Laws and

Jupiter Lays Pvt.Ltd Vs. Commercial Tax Officer

Court: Kerala

193 WP(C).No. 31068 of 2012 (G) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------- JUPITER LAYS PVT.LTD, OKKAL.P.O, PERUMBAVOOR REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR VINU SAGAR.

Harijan Lay out Sudhar Samiti and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra an ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1997)99BOMLR434

general and residents of Jaripatka, Mecosabagh Sindhi Colony and Nazul Lay-Out and Harijan Colony etc., particulary and thereby it is in

Frito Lay India and ors. Vs. Shivdeep Food Products Pvt. Ltd. and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2003(67)DRJ370; 2003(26)PTC309(Del)

J.D. Kapoor, J.1. This is a suit for permanent injunction for restraining the defendants from using the 'KURRAM KURRAM' packaging...

Frito-lay India and Another Vs. Amit Goswamy and Another

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1999VIAD(Delhi)653; 82(1999)DLT113

discs with or without grooves with each packet of its Lays & Cheetos chips. Though it is alleged in the plaint

Fritco-lay India and anr. Vs. Uncle Chipps Private Limited

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2000VAD(Delhi)874; 2000(2)ARBLR519(Delhi); 86(2000)DLT31; (2000)126PLR57

Pharmacy's case (supra), : [1963]2SCR484 : 'The Act does not lay down any criteria for determining what is likely to deceive

Hy-lay Poultry Farms Vs. the State of Haryana

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: [1985]58STC208(P& H)

G.C. Mital, J.1. M/s. Hy-Lay Poultry Farms, Karnal (hereinafter called the assessee), is a partnership concern which maintains a poultry...

Frito-lay India Vs. Commissioner of Cen. Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2007)(115)ECC367

1. The issue in this appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune who has confirmed duty...