Lawsuit - Judgment Search Results
Prosecution Version Vs. State of Punjab
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-14-2014
prosecution is nothing but a make belief story of the prosecution. Dharam Pal, an official of the Punjab State Electricity Board,
Prosecution. Vs. State of Haryana and Others
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-23-2014
The petitioners did the same and served the respondent-authorities vide legal notice(s) dated 03.04.2013. Finding no response, they have again knocked
R (on the Application of Gujra) (Fc) Vs. Crown Prosecution Service
Court: UK Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-14-2012
6. The appellant promptly consulted solicitors about a possible private prosecution referable to both these alleged incidents; but the police also
T.C. Kanabar and anr. Vs. Assistant Collector of Customs, Preventive ( ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-18-1985
Reported in: 1986(10)ECC308
can be presumed from all the -circumstances proved by the prosecution. The section, however, provides that the presumption is rebuttable. Therefore,
Assange Vs. the Swedish Prosecution Authority
Court: UK Supreme Court
Decided on: May-30-2012
issuing Member State." Thus, so far as a fugitive from prosecution was concerned, this article envisaged that before the issue of
Superintendent (Prosecution) Vs. Sita Ram Somani and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-24-2009
Reported in: RLW2009(4)Raj3430
regard to purity of gold has been produced by the prosecution. Thus it is also not proved that the said recovered
M.P. Purusothaman and ors. Vs. Assistant Director of Income-tax (Prose ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-24-2000
Reported in: [2001]252ITR603(Mad)
provisions of the Act is by way of prosecution. The prosecution is not to be launched lightly as provided in Section
Assistant Collector of Customs, (Prosecution) Preventive Department, M ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-14-1985
Reported in: 1986(7)ECC58; 1987(29)ELT853(Mad)
said firm and that it was clearly a manipulation. The prosecution examined six witnesses on its side. All of them are
Assistant Collector of Customs, Madras (Prosecution) Preventive Depart ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-24-1980
Reported in: 1984(15)ELT118(Mad)
accused. The Additional Collector of Customs passed an order sanctioning prosecution and a complaint was laid against all the three accused.
E. Kesavan Vs. Assistant Collector of Customs (Prosecution) Preventive ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-11-1986
Reported in: 1987(27)ELT640(Mad)
by the trial court itself. 2. The case of the prosecution is that on 28-11-1979 Preventive Officer of the customs found
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »