Lawsuit - Judgment Search Results
Prosecution Version Vs. State of Punjab
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-14-2014
he was to further undergo RI for three months. Both the substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently. Prosecution version 2. The prosecution case as it emerges from statement (Ex.PD) of complainant Smt. Jaspal Kaur made to
Prosecution. Vs. State of Haryana and Others
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-23-2014
be the remedy except to approach the authorities?. The petitioners did the same and served the respondent-authorities vide legal notice(s) dated 03.04.2013. Finding no response, they have again knocked at the doors of this Court. If the
Mohd Abaad Ali Vs. Directtorate Of Revenue Prosecution Intelligence
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-20-2024
APPEAL No.OF2024(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRL.) No.2052 OF2017 MOHD ABAAD ALI & ANR. …APPELLANTS VERSUS DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE PROSECUTION INTELLIGENCE …RESPONDENT JUDGMENT SUDHANSHU DHULIA, J.Leave granted.1. The present appellant was one of the four accused in a
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Prasanth U vs Department of Prosecution Service, Represented by Its Se ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-17-2023
UNDODIYIL HOUSE, PERUVAYAL P.O., KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673008 BY ADVS. SAYED MANSOOR BAFAKHY THANGAL R.ANUPAMA RESPONDENTS:1 DEPARTMENT OF PROSECUTION SERVICE, [*CORRECTED] REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001. *KERALA STATE PROSECUTION SERVICE, DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION,
Rakesh R. Sharma Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Prosecutio ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-31-2004
Reported in: 2005CriLJ774
S.I. for 3 months. The accused is in custody since 19.6.1998 till this date.2. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that, The Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Sahar Airport, Mumbai received a letter dated 18.6.1998 from
Superintendent (Prosecution) Vs. Sita Ram Somani and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-24-2009
Reported in: RLW2009(4)Raj3430
Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962 (herein after referred to as 'Act, 1962').2. The nub of the prosecution story is as under:That on a prior information regarding illicit transaction of contraband' gold the headquarter's Customs Preventive
Velvette International Pharma Products Ltd. Rep. by Its Managing Direc ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-29-2005
Reported in: 2006(196)ELT143(Mad)
original petitions are filed to quash the complaint dated 16.04.2003 preferred by the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, Prosecution Unit against the petitioners.3. The complaint was preferred on the ground that the A1-Company was managed by A2
Rekhaparameswari D/O. Govindaraj Vs. Assistant Collector of Customs, P ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-22-2009
Reported in: 2009CriLJ3315
Aggrieved by the said conviction and sentence, the appellant herein had preferred this appeal.2. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows:P.W.1 Usharani, who was the Security Officer at Madras Meenambakkam Airport, was on duty
Smt.Rukshana Deshpande. Vs. the Additional Commissioner of Central Exc ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-13-2010
counsel appearing for the petitioners. In 1982 (2) SCC 543 [Uttam Chand v. I.T.O.], Income Tax Authorities launched prosecution against the appellant and others on the ground that when the Partnership firm was not genuine and a
C.Sreeja Vs. Director General of Prosecution
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jan-14-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN MONDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 24TH POUSHA 193 WP(C).No. 15647 of 2005 (K) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- C. SREEJA, D/O. C....
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free