Lawsuit - Judgment Search Results

Prosecution Version Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Punjab and Haryana

he was to further undergo RI for three months. Both the substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently. Prosecution version 2. The prosecution case as it emerges from statement (Ex.PD) of complainant Smt. Jaspal Kaur made to

Prosecution. Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

be the remedy except to approach the authorities?. The petitioners did the same and served the respondent-authorities vide legal notice(s) dated 03.04.2013. Finding no response, they have again knocked at the doors of this Court. If the

Mohd Abaad Ali Vs. Directtorate Of Revenue Prosecution Intelligence

Court: Supreme Court of India

APPEAL No.OF2024(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRL.) No.2052 OF2017 MOHD ABAAD ALI & ANR. …APPELLANTS VERSUS DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE PROSECUTION INTELLIGENCE …RESPONDENT JUDGMENT SUDHANSHU DHULIA, J.Leave granted.1. The present appellant was one of the four accused in a

Prasanth U vs Department of Prosecution Service, Represented by Its Se ...

Court: Kerala

UNDODIYIL HOUSE, PERUVAYAL P.O., KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673008 BY ADVS. SAYED MANSOOR BAFAKHY THANGAL R.ANUPAMA RESPONDENTS:1 DEPARTMENT OF PROSECUTION SERVICE, [*CORRECTED] REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001. *KERALA STATE PROSECUTION SERVICE, DIRECTORATE OF PROSECUTION,

Biji George vs 1. State of Kerala Represented by Its Director General ...

Court: Kerala

TRIVANDRUM, PIN - 695043 BY ADV L.SATHY RESPONDENTS/STATE/COMPLAINANT: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PROSECUTION HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682531 2 STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MANNANTHALA POLICE STATION MANNANTHALA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,

Sai Krishna vs the Superintendent of Customs Prosecution (Sea)

Court: Chennai

11.03.2025PRONOUNCED ON : 14.03.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHANSai Krishna ... Petitioner/Accused No.2 Vs. The Superintendent of Customs Prosecution (Sea) O/o. The Principal Commissioner of Customs, Preventive Commissionerate, Customs House, Chennai - 600 001. (R.R.No.3 of 2025).

Rakesh R. Sharma Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Prosecutio ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2005CriLJ774

S.I. for 3 months. The accused is in custody since 19.6.1998 till this date.2. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that, The Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Sahar Airport, Mumbai received a letter dated 18.6.1998 from

Superintendent (Prosecution) Vs. Sita Ram Somani and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: RLW2009(4)Raj3430

Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962 (herein after referred to as 'Act, 1962').2. The nub of the prosecution story is as under:That on a prior information regarding illicit transaction of contraband' gold the headquarter's Customs Preventive

Velvette International Pharma Products Ltd. Rep. by Its Managing Direc ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2006(196)ELT143(Mad)

original petitions are filed to quash the complaint dated 16.04.2003 preferred by the Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, Prosecution Unit against the petitioners.3. The complaint was preferred on the ground that the A1-Company was managed by A2

Rekhaparameswari D/O. Govindaraj Vs. Assistant Collector of Customs, P ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2009CriLJ3315

Aggrieved by the said conviction and sentence, the appellant herein had preferred this appeal.2. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows:P.W.1 Usharani, who was the Security Officer at Madras Meenambakkam Airport, was on duty