Lat - Judgment Search Results
Sh. Om Lat Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2012
The respondents also contended that in the initial representation the petitioner admitted that he had been dismissed, however, later on he started alleging that he was issued a movement order under the false pretext that he is
State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Lat Singh and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: May-05-1989
Reported in: 1990CriLJ723
repeal is also not attracted. A prior particular or special law is not presumed to be repealed by latter general enatment. As observed by the Supreme Court in the U.P. State Electricity Board v. Hari Shankar Jain,
Hussain Bee W/O. Lat Honnur Sab vs the State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-31-2025
BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 102119 OF 2025 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:1. HUSSAIN BEE W/O. LATE HONNUR SAB, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, R/O: D.NO.31/1, NEAR DALWALA MOSQUE, 1ST CROSS, BALLARI, DIST: BALLARI-583 101.2. ARAVIND S/O.
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Smt R .G.Chinnamma W/O. Lats Gowindarajulu Naidu and ors Vs. Sri. S. U ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-03-2010
in her lifetime when he was aged about II years old and there was a registered adoption deed, later and that on the death of the deceased, the right to sue survives and he is entitled to
S. Shashidhara Rao S/O Late N. Subbaiah Vs. M. Vishwanath S/O Late Mun ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-01-2006
Reported in: 2006(4)KarLJ185
only son D and each one of them are entitled to equal share in the half share of late K . Therefore, the amended provisions of Hindu Succession Act, 2005 are not applicable to the facts of
Smt Janaki Bai W/O Late Dharmoji Rao, Vs. Shankarappa S/O Narayan Rao
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-01-2006
Reported in: 2006(5)KarLJ469
there is a tenancy issue in question, naturally the Tribunal has to give a finding on this and later the Civil Court has to dispose of the case according to law.15. In view of the same, the
Committee of Management Shanti Niketan Inter College Through Its Manag ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-24-2008
Reported in: AIR2009All7
Rakesh Tiwari, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Counsel for the respondents, learned Standing counsel for the State and perused the record.2. This petition has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of direction...
K. Pasala Reddy @ A.K. Pasalappa S/O Late A.P. Krishnappa Reptd. by Gp ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-28-2007
Reported in: 2008(3)KLJ63; 2008(1)KCCR158; 2008(1)AIRKarR590
ORDERN.K. Patil, J.1. Petitioner, questioning the order dated 3rd January 2005 passed by second respondent in proceedings No. RRT. (2)GR.272/1995-96 vide Annexure J, has presented the instant writ petition.2. The grievance of the petitioner in the...
The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs. Suganthi W/O. Late Mohanan,
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Dec-08-2009
Abdul Rehim, J.1. The 2nd respondent before the Tribunal, who is the insurer of the vehicle involved in the accident, is the appellant herein. The claim arises out of death of one Sri: Mohanan, the husband...
Mr. Jayarama S/O Late Ishwara Poojary, Vs. Mr. Subbu Poojary S/O Late ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-02-2010
(30) 1943 follows:the legal representative of the deceased defendant is bound to adopt the written statement of the latter and cannot at the appellate stage raise a new case, a case inconsistent with the case of the
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free