Last Resort - Judgment Search Results

Sahil Resorts, Agri Fields and Farms Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Suman Resorts India ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2005(3)ALLMR641; 2005(5)BomCR155; 2005(3)MhLj1091

Rs. 25 lakhs was claimed by way of maintenance charges as it was agreed between the parties. The last such reminder is dated 18th December 2001. Till the end of December 2003 nothing further progressed between the … passed by the Court below was stayed and the said order continues as at present.The plaintiff i.e. M/s.Suman Resorts India Ltd. is a Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and its Directors are as under:(1) Shaikh

Somatheeram Ayurvedic Beach Resort Pvt.Ltd vs Chowara Beach Resorts Pv ...

Court: Kerala

/ 9TH CHAITHRA, 1945 OP(C) NO. 474 OF 2015 OS 45/2014 OF SUB COURT,NEYYATTINKARA PETITIONER: SOMATHEERAM AYURVEDIC BEACH RESORT PVT.LTD WHICH IS A JURISTIC PERSON/COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT CHOWARA,

State of Kerala and anr. Vs. B. Six Holiday Resorts (P) Ltd. and Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2010(2)SCALE839; (2010)5SCC186

were amended by Foreign Liquor (Amendment) Rules, 2002 with retrospective effect from 1.7.2001. By the said amendment, the last proviso under Sub-rule (3) of Rule 13 was substituted by the following proviso:Provided that no new licences under … for FL-3 licences.2. For convenience, we will refer to the facts of the case of M/s. B.Six Holiday Resorts (P) Ltd. (referred to as `the applicant' for short), who is the respondent in C.A. No. 983 of

Rockwood Hotels and Resorts Limited Vs. Starwood Asia Pacific Hotels a ...

Court: Mumbai

shall be issued no later than the one hundred-eightieth (180th) day following the appointment of arbitrator or the last of them. The award shall be in writing, shall given reasons for the decisions reached by the Tribunal … Part I does not apply, section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 also therefore, cannot be resorted to. In my view, even for seeking interim relief by any of the parties hereto, the parties would

Fomento Resorts and Hotels Ltd. and anr. Vs. Minguel Martins and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2009(57)BLJR711; 2009(4)BomCR348; JT2009(1)SC470; 2009(1)SCALE758; (2009)3SCC571; 2009(1)LC411(SC)

date of their construction is lost in antiquity but has been known to exist at least for the last seventy years. 2H. In order to have access to the portion of the beach existing in the property … Pvt. Ltd. and Ors., Writ Petition No. 36 of 1992 Goa Foundation and Anr. v. Fomento Hotels and Resorts Limited and Ors. and Writ Petition No. 141 of 1992 Shri Gustavo Renato de Cruz Pinto v. State

Ras Resorts and Apart Hotels Limited and anr Vs. Union of India and or ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

advantage even though it was only a proposal that in fact never materialised into a scheme.19. Mr. Grover lastly took us through the letters sent by the appellants and their creditors to the respondents making demand for

Jal Mahal Resorts P.Ltd. Vs. K.P.Sharma and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

on the northern fringe of Jaipur city and the glory of the lake as a pristine water body lasted until the former rulers had their control over the city and unpleasant history of lake began when new … SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.4912 OF2014(Arising out of SLP (Civil) 17701/2012) Jal Mahal Resorts P. Ltd. ..Appellant Versus K.P. Sharma & Ors. ..Respondents With CIVIL APPEAL NO.4913 OF2014(Arising out of SLP (Civil)

Asia Resorts Ltd. Vs. Usha Breco Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2002SC55; 2002(1)ALT1(SC); 2001(3)ARBLR503(SC); (2002)1CompLJ1(SC); JT2001(9)SC301; 2001(7)SCALE590; (2001)8SCC710; MANU/SC/0689/2001

Balakrishnan, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellant constructed a hotel resort by name 'Timber Trail Heights' at Bansaar in Himachal Pradesh. This place is at a high altitude of … the same. The disputes and differences between the parties arose after 17.4.1990. Thereafter, there was mutual consultation, which lasted up to 1993 until it ultimately failed and then alone the cause of action arose for filing petition

Fomento Resorts and Hotels Ltd. Vs. Gustavo Ranato Da Cruz Pinto and o ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1985SC736; (1985)87BOMLR144; 1985MhLJ606(SC); 1985(1)SCALE394; (1985)2SCC152; [1985]2SCR937; 1985(17)LC729(SC)

Sabyasachi Mukharji1. Special leave granted.2. This appeal filed by M/s. Fomento Resorts and Hotels Limited raises the short question as to whether compliance with Rule 4 of the Land Acquisition

Divine Tiger Resorts & Hotels Private Limited (In Vol. Liqn.) Vs.-

Court: Delhi

OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :08. 05.2017 Judgment pronounced on:29. 05.2017 CO.PET. 35/2017 DIVINE TIGER RESORTS & HOTELS PRIVATE LIMITED (IN VOL. LIQN.) Through: Mr. Mayank Goel and Mr. Monamshel Maring, Advocates for the