Land Commissioners - Judgment Search Results

The Land Commissioner, Madras and anr. Vs. Rajeswari

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2003SC3516; 2003(4)ALD124(SC); [2003(3)JCR177(SC)]; JT2003(3)SC560; 2003(3)SCALE630; (2003)5SCC210; [2003]3SCR361

13.8.1980. R. VivekanandaReddiar preferred a revision petition under Section 82 of the Act, which wasdismissed by the Land Commissioner vide order dated 7.5.1981 on thefinding that the family consisted of six members and the respondent,Rajeswari, was holding … G.P. Mathur, J.1. This appeal by special leave has been filed by the LandCommissioner, Madras & Anr. challenging the judgment and order dated13.2.1997 of a Division Bench of Madras High Court by

Land Commissioner and anr. Vs. Manjiya Pillai

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1994Supp(2)SCC464

S.C. Agrawal and; R.M. Sahai, JJ.1. This appeal arises out of proceedings taken under the Tamil Nadu Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Land) Act, 1961. Section 50 of the said Act makes provision for determination … of the compensation earlier. The said order of the authorised officer was upheld in revision by the Land Commissioner but on a writ petition filed by the respondent the learned Single Judge of the Madras High Court

The Land Commissioner Chepauk, Chennai and Others Vs. VGP Housing Pvt. ...

Court: Chennai

consider the case of exemption sought for by the agreement holders in respect of the acquisition of excess lands under the Land Reforms Act. 2. While W.A. No.1519 of 2015 has been filed by the State assailing … subsequent to the orders of the Supreme Court, in the year 2008, filed a revision before the Land Commissioner challenging the Section 18 (1) Notification issued under the Land Reforms Act. However, the said revision was dismissed

The Land Commissioner and anr. Vs. Rajeswari

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1997(2)CTC402

appellant made in his proceedings dated 7.5.1981, confirming the final statement published Under Section 12 of Tamil Nadu Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Land) Act, Act 58 of 1961, as amended by Act 17 of 1970 … of which Vivekananda Reddiar was the head. The stand taken by the Authorised Officer, as also the land Commissioner in fixing the ceiling for the family and preparing and publishing the final statement was that in as

The Land Commissioner, Board of Revenue and anr. Vs. Sri Muthu Ganapad ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1987)1MLJ221

by the respondent, however, made an order which indicated that this was pre-eminently a case in which the Land Commissioner could consider the exercise of his suo motu power of revision under Section 82 read with Rule … the respondent, however, made an order which indicated that this was pre-eminently a case in which the Land Commissioner could consider the exercise of his suo motu power of revision under Section 82 read with Rule 62(ii)

The Land Commissioner, Board of Revenue Chepauk and the Authorised Off ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1980)2MLJ16

by a decision of this Court to which one of us was a party, in Vadivel Servai v. Land Commissioner Board of Revenue (L.R.) Madras-5 and Ors. W.A. Nos. 129 to 135 of 1976 dated 13th July, … a decision of this Court to which one of us was a party, in Vadivel Servai v. Land Commissioner Board of Revenue (L.R.) Madras-5 and Ors. W.A. Nos. 129 to 135 of 1976 dated 13th July, 1978.

Malliga vs the Land Commissioner

Court: Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 17-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Malliga ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Land Commissioner Land Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai.2. The District Collector3. The District Revenue Officer4. The Revenue Divisional Officer5. The … THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 17-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Malliga ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Land Commissioner Land Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai.2. The District Collector3. The District Revenue Officer4. The Revenue Divisional Officer5. The Thasildar..Respondent(s)

Siva vs the Land Commissioner

Court: Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 17-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Siva ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Land Commissioner Land Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai.2. The District Collector3. The District Revenue Officer4. The Revenue Divisional Officer5. The … THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 17-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Siva ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Land Commissioner Land Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai.2. The District Collector3. The District Revenue Officer4. The Revenue Divisional Officer5. The Thasildar..Respondent(s)

Kalaivanan vs the Land Commissioner

Court: Chennai

MADRASDATED : 02.03.2026CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE and W.M.P.No.8680 of 2026 Kalaivanan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Land Commissioner, Land Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai. 2.The District Collector, Tirupathur 3.The District Revenue Officer, 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, … : 02.03.2026CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE and W.M.P.No.8680 of 2026 Kalaivanan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Land Commissioner, Land Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai. 2.The District Collector, Tirupathur 3.The District Revenue Officer, 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, 5.The

Raja vs the Land Commissioner

Court: Chennai

MADRASDATED : 02.03.2026CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE and W.M.P.No.8693 of 2026 Raja ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Land Commissioner, Land Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai. 2.The District Collector, Tirupathur 3.The District Revenue Officer, 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, … : 02.03.2026CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE and W.M.P.No.8693 of 2026 Raja ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Land Commissioner, Land Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai. 2.The District Collector, Tirupathur 3.The District Revenue Officer, 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, 5.The