Labour Industrial - Judgment Search Results
Narayan Sukhtankar, Carrying on Business in the Name of Suman Art Prin ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-15-2008
Reported in: [2008(118)FLR608]; 2008(4)MhLj64
J.1. This Writ Petition takes exception to the Judgment and Order (Award) passed by the Presiding Officer, 12th Labour Court, Mumbai dated 23rd March 2004 in Reference (IDA) No. 460 of 1995. The Respondent No. 1 raised … Court, Mumbai dated 23rd March 2004 in Reference (IDA) No. 460 of 1995. The Respondent No. 1 raised industrial dispute which was referred under Section 10(1) and Section 12(5) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for adjudication.2.
Navbharat Press Employees Union, Mafatlal Employees Union Vs. State of ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-08-2009
Reported in: 2009(111)BomLR4347
filing this petition on behalf of the employees who are its members. Respondent 2 is the Commissioner of Labour, Mumbai. Respondent 3 is the Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Thane and respondent 4 is the Deputy Commissioner of … Resolution of the said dispute would require full-fledged trial and, hence, it could be adjudicated only by an Industrial Tribunal constituted under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short, 'the ID Act'). Since there was no response
Ganpat Singh Vs. Bank of Baroda and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-20-2006
Reported in: 2007(1)WLN113
an industrial dispute which depends upon the decision of the Appropriate Government to refer the dispute to the Labour Court or not.7. The petitioner-appellant in DB Special Appeal (W) No. 4814/2005 has raised in industrial dispute when
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free