Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: labour exchange Court: kolkata Page 6 of about 871 results (0.017 seconds)

Dec 08 2006 (HC)

Parikshit Mishra and ors. Vs. Indian Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2007)3CALLT205(HC),2007(2)CHN652

..... in the said paragraph of the said affidavit it has been stated that the company is finding it extremely difficult to pay to the contractors for the idle labour engaged by them and the insignificant jobs which the company is still required to carry on at its township in kulty can be got done by persons drawn from other establishments of the company and for this ..... order dated 28 3 2000 an hon'ble single judge was pleased to dispose of the writ petition wherein it was recorded inter alia that the petitioners who are rendering services continuously over 10 years as contract labourers without any interruption sought for direct appointment by the respondent employer and having been denied the said writ petition was filed. ..... that another representation dated 28.09.2000 was made by the petitioners wherein the petitioners made a request for abolition of contract labour in certain jobs in the town engineering department and township and another representation dated 07.12.2000 was also on similar lines. ..... but in the event steps are taken under the contract labour (regulation and abolition) act, 1970 to prohibit by appropriate notification, employment of contract labourers in the process of operation of other work in the establishment of the respondent employer then of course, contract labourers who had been discharging such prohibited functions may be deemed to have acquired right to get direct employment from the respondent employer but until such time prohibition is made by the notification .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2008 (TRI)

Kwality Ice Creams (India) (P.) Ltd., in Re

Court : Company Law Board CLB Kolkata

Reported in : 2009(148)CC631; 2009(91)SCL231(CLB-KOL.)

1. the petitioner company has presented this petition under section 17 of the companies act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the act); for confirmation of the alteration to the situation clause in the memorandum of association of the company for shifting of the registered office of the company from the state of west bengal to the national capital territory of delhi, as approved by a special resolution passed in accordance with section 189 of the companies act, 1956, at its annual general meeting held on 24-9-2004. an application filed by the company seeking extension of time in filing the petition, is allowed. 2. initially, director, economic offences investigation cell, finance department, government of west bengal, vide his letters dated 8-7-2005, had raised certain queries in respect of the company regarding non-payment of sales tax/profession tax and non-payment of compensation to the employees for transferring the company to m/s. hindustan lever limited. in reply, the company by its communication dated 11-4-2007, explained all those queries to which director, economic offences investigation cell, did not react thereafter, despite further notice dated 16-4-2007 issued by this bench. 3. further, this bench has also issued notices in june, 2007 and august, 2008 to the state government, for communicating its final view on the petition filed by the company to which neither any objection/ representation has been filed nor did any one appeared for the state government before .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 24 1998 (HC)

Ajit Kumar Barat Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1998)2CALLT533(HC),1998(2)CHN113

..... of opinion that any industrial dispute exists or is apprehended, it may at any time, by order in writing,-- (a) * * * * * * *(b) * * * * * * * (c) refer the dispute or any matter appearing to be connected with, or relevant to, the dispute, if it relates to any matter specified in the second schedule to a labour court for adjudication : or (d) refer the dispute or any matter appearing to be connected with, or relevant to the dispute, whether it relates to any matter specified in the second schedule or the third schedule, to a tribunal for adjudication.' 11. ..... x x x x x x (5) if, on a consideration of the report referred in sub-section (4), the appropriate government is satisfied that there is a case for reference to a board, labour court, tribunal or national tribunal, it may make such reference. ..... the power of reference of disputes to adjudication by the appropriate government to a labour court, tribunal or national tribunal is conferred by section 10(1) of the act10 ..... the opinion is that the employee is a workman and a reference is made to a labour court or industrial tribunal etc. ..... is, therefore, recommended that the following issues may be referred to an industrial tribunal/labour court for adjudication. ..... meaning any dispute or difference between (1) employers and employers, or (11) between employers and workmen, or (ill) between workmen and workmen, which is connected with the employment or non-employment or the terms of employment or with the conditions of labour, of any person. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 18 1972 (HC)

New Beerbhoom Coal Co. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Joint Director of Mines, Safe ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1973Cal17

..... the economic burden of providing the minimum protection to the life and health of workmen employed in establishments where such workmen are easily and ordinarily exposed to occupational hazards they would nonetheless be protected by article 19 in exploiting the labour and making them face such occupational hazards and refuse them, the minimum protection against the same ..... . this act was passed with a view to amending and consolidating the law relating to the regulation of labour and safety in mines, it is obvious that the regulation made is a safety measure adopted to protect the workmen from avoidable physical injuries while working in the mines .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 31 1900 (PC)

Sukumari Bewa, Minor by Her Father and Guardian Chema Malia Vs. Ananta ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1901)ILR28Cal168

1. the suit out of which this appeal arises was one brought by a widow to recover possession of the property of her deceased husband, held by a person who claimed to be her husband's adopted son. the plaintiff did not appear on the day fixed for the hearing of the case and no witnesses were produced on her behalf. the munsif, therefore, proceeded to take the evidence of the defendants' witnesses, and upon the evidence he found that the adoption had not been proved.2. on appeal to the district judge, that officer held that the adoption had been proved, and he, therefore, dismissed the suit.3. now the plaintiff has appealed to this court, and on her behalf two grounds have been taken: first, that the court below has erred in law in holding that adoption by a leper is valid; and secondly, that the lower appellate court was wrong in not remanding the case to give the plaintiff an opportunity of examining her witnesses.4. with regard to the first point we need only say that the decision of the judge seems to be correct. he says: 'the law appears to be that a leper cannot perform, any religious ceremony, but, as no such ceremonies are necessary for an adoption among sudras, a sudra leper may adopt a child by purely civil rites.' that seems to us a correct exposition of the law, and nothing has been shown to us to-day to lead us to think that the lower appellate court's decision is wrong. according to mayne's hindu law and usage, paragraph 99, it seems as if a leper may adopt. there .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 01 2014 (HC)

Ratan Lal JaIn and anr. Vs. Union of India

Court : Kolkata

c.s.183 of 2007 in the high court at calcutta ordinary original civil jurisdiction original side ratan lal jain & anr. versus union of india before: the hon ble justice soumen sen date: 1st august, 2014. appearance: mr.arijit chakraborty, adv.ms.amrita pandey, adv.mr.palash mukherjee, adv.mr.n.chowdhury, adv.the court: the plaintiff has instituted the suit for specific return of 33320 kgs. betel nuts seized by the customs authorities and in the alternative a decree for a sum of rs.1,78,44,258/- as pleaded in paragraph 17 of the plaint. the plaintiff in the further alternative has prayed for an enquiry into the damages and a decree for such sum as may be found due upon such enquiry. in spite of service of the writ of summons and service of notices upon the defendants, the defendants have failed to enter appearance and filed their written statement. in the circumstances, although the plaintiff is not required to lead any evidence in view of the doctrine of non-travers.and the fact that the plaintiff having knowledge of the proceeding has avoided to appear and contest the proceeding, the plaintiff no.1 appears and gives evidence in support of the claim made in the plaint. the cause of action in the suit arose by reason of illegal seizure of 33320 kgs. betel nuts which were subsequently sold by the customs authorities. the plaintiff claims that the said confiscation was illegal and held to be so by superintendent (adjudication) commissioner of customs (preventive) by a reasoned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 1990 (HC)

Tota Mia and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1990)2CALLT235(HC)

..... workers in consultation with the finance department.notwithstanding anything contained in the recruitment policy circulars issued by the state government from time to time, 5% of vacancies against the quota of 70% earmarked for recruitment through employment exchanges shall be kept reserved for absorption of 'those casual' and such other categories of workers, who are 'already engaged in perennial type of work' and have rendered at least 240 days' service in a year ..... the deponent further stated that as it was not possible to get such labourers through employment exchanges, the petitioners were engaged by the range officers concerned from the date mentioned against each of them as 'contract mazdoor' which has been referred to in annexures 'b' and 'b/l' ..... seasonal workers who have worked for five years or more in consecutive seasons shall be considered for appointment by the respective employing authorities along with the candidates sponsored by the employment exchanges.the system of engaging 'contract labour' for a 'perennial type of work' by certain state government establishments/undertakings, etc. ..... gradual absorption of 'contract labour' in the regular establishment of the principal employer necessary steps may be taken by the concerned employing authority.henceforth, at the time of appointment of contractors one of the terms and conditions shall be that initial recruitment to all categories of staff by the contractors shall invariably be through the employment exchanges. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 15 2007 (HC)

Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs. Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2008(1)CHN721

..... the arbitrators thereafter proceeded to sum up their conclusion upon 'perusal of the documents on record, including the site order book as also the correspondence exchanged between the parties' that there were events in course of execution of the contract which would justify the contractor's claim for extension of time till march 31, 1999. ..... it is also of some significance that the petitioner's letter of february 27, 1997 granting extension of time for completion by 180 days imposed two conditions, one of which was that the contractor would not be entitled to idle labour charges till december 27, 1996, thereby suggesting that the parties did not understand the agreement to altogether rule out any claim on account of idling.50. ..... such letter referred to various correspondence exchanged between the parties between november, 1996 and early february, 1997 and the petitioner agreed to extend the period not exceeding 180 days subject to the two conditions that the contractor would not be entitled to payment of bonus as per clause 9.10 of the agreement should it complete the work before the extended period and the contractor would not claim for idle labour charges, if any, incurred ..... the letter of april 28, 1999 comes upon heaps of previous letters exchanged between the parties and the arbitrators cannot be faulted for not confining themselves to what directly appears from such letter but in going back to the previous letters to find support for the contractor on its .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 24 1967 (HC)

Kanan Devan Hills Produce Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Cal ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1968Cal298,[1968]67ITR823(Cal)

..... of 1885) indicates the meaning in the following language:--'raiyat means primarily a person who has acquired such a right to hold the land for the purpose of cultivating it by himselfor by members of his family or by servants or labourers or with the aid of partners, and includes also the successor-in-interest of persons who have acquired such a right.'17. ..... the outhouses or is parts of the dwelling house fulfil the requirement of section 2(e)(ii); but ii the assessee does not or cannot require a dwelling house at all, then the quarters built by itself for accommodation of its servants, labourers and staff will not be its own dwelling house by any stretch of imagination. ..... in dismissing the claim of the assessee calcutta stock exchange association limited, for relief under section 9(2) proviso if the indian income ..... pal submitted that the word 'implement' meant an instrument of labour and was wide enough to include even plant or machinery alternatively he argued that the explanation to section 5(1)(ix) made it abundantly clear that plant and machinery used in any tea or other plantation in connection with ..... stock exchange association ..... up for consideration of this court in the case entitled re calcutta stock exchange association ltd. ..... of the calcutta stock exchange association ltd. ..... the case of calcutta stock exchange ltd. ..... cultivation need not be carried on by the cultivator personally he may do so by himself, by members of his family, by servants or labourers with the aid of partners. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 23 2009 (HC)

Calcutta Port Trust and ors. Vs. Sanku Maharaj Adhikari and ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... be given on the basis of recommendation of the screening committee constituted by the state government in its circular dated 12th may, 1986 after the names of the candidates were sponsored by the concerned employment exchange and such appointments would, however, depend on qualifying in the selection test, conducted by port authorities and subject to availability of vacancies.16. ..... writ petitioners/respondents was that although they were assured that they would be provided with employment as unskilled labours in haldia dock complex, the respondent authorities refused to consider their case for such appointment.15. ..... it appears that in july, 1997 port authorities sent a requisition to the local employment exchange, haldia for filling up 75 vacancies in the unskilled category and against such requisition names of 700 candidates, including the writ petitioners ..... it was the further case of the writ petitioners that the employment exchange had sponsored the candidates from the land looser evictees and two panels were prepared, one in the year 1996-97 ..... by the impugned judgment dated 13.1.2005 allowed the writ application and directed the respondent authorities to appoint the writ petitioners/respondents in the post of unskilled labourers within a period of three months. ..... petitioners/respondents that there were sufficient vacancies in haldia dock complex, but in spite of that the concerned authority did not appoint the writ petitioners and on the contrary appointed contract labourers.5. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //