Labor Union - Judgment Search Results

Ongc Labour Union Vs. Ongc Dehradun

Court: Supreme Court of India

OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.__8114____OF2019REPORTABLE (ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.5805 OF2019 ONGC LABOUR UNION APPELLANT(S) VERSUS ONGC DEHRADUN & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT Hrishikesh Roy, J.1. Leave granted. Heard Mr. Colin Gonsalves,

Papnasam Labour Union Vs. Madura Coats Ltd. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1995SC2200; (1995)97BOMLR319; [1995(70)FLR319]; JT1995(1)SC71; 1995LabIC735; 1994(5)SCALE153; (1995)1SCC501; [1994]Supp6SCR369; (1995)1UPLBEC479

Court in invalidating Section 25-O of the Industrial Disputes Act in the decision rendered in Excel Wear v. Union of India : (1978)IILLJ527SC . The Madras High Court further held that in view of its finding that … petition respondent No. 1 also prayed that the State of Tamil Nadu represented by the Secretary to Government, Labour and Employment Department, Madras should be restrained from enforcing the provisions of the said industrial Dispute (Amendment) Act

General Labour Union (Red Flag), Bombay Vs. Ahmedabad Mfg. and Calico ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1995)IILLJ765SC; 1995Supp(1)SCC175

filed a complaint before the Industrial Court under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (the 'Act') complaining of the breach of Items 1(a), (b), 4(a), (f) and 6 of … Sawant, J.1. The appellant-union had filed a complaint before the Industrial Court under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (the 'Act') complaining of the breach of Items 1(a), (b),

General Labour Union (Red Flag) Bombay Vs. B.V. Chavan and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1985SC297; (1985)87BOMLR38; [1985(50)FLR16]; 1985LabIC726; (1985)ILLJ82SC; 1984(2)SCALE749; (1985)1SCC312; [1985]2SCR64; 1985(17)LC226(SC)

D.A. Desai, J.1. General Labour Union (Red Flag) Bombay filed two complaints, one against M/s. Delta Wires Pvt Ltd. and second against 'M/s.

Bombay Labour Union Representing the Workmen of International Franchis ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1966SC942; [1966(12)FLR161]; (1966)ILLJ417SC; [1966]2SCR493

day now to stress the absolute freedom of an employer to impose any condition which he likes on labour. It is always open to industrial adjudication to consider the conditions of employment of labour and to vary … Service so requires, call upon her to resign.' 7. It will be seen that this rule for the India Administrative Service is not unqualified like the rule in force in the respondent's concern. It only lays down

Fact Casual Labours Union vs Fertilizers and Chemicals Travancore Limi ...

Court: Kerala

1 TO 10 ARE CASUAL LABOURS OF FACT) 11 THE FERTILIZERS AND CHEMICALS TRAVANCORE LIMITED (FACT) CASUAL EMPLOYEES UNION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, ELOOR,, UDYOGAMANDAL, ERNAKULAM.SRI.THAMPAN THOMAS SRI.B.V.JOY SANKER RESPONDENTS:1 THE FERTILIZERS AND CHEMICALS TRAVANCORE TRAVANCORE LIMITED … 501. 2 THE GENERAL MANAGER FERTILIZERS AND CHEMICALS TRAVANCORE LIMITED, HEAD OFFICE, UDYOGAMANDAL, KOCHI- 683 501. 3 ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER (CENTRAL) KENDRIYA SHRAM SADAN, OOLIMUGAL, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM - 682 0301. SRI.P.BENNY THOMAS SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR SRI.K.JOHN MATHAI SRI.JOSON

Karnataka General Labour Union R vs Regional Provident Fund Commission ...

Court: Karnataka

BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 24662 OF 2024 (L-PF) BETWEEN:1. KARNATAKA GENERAL LABOUR UNION RNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ROCK MECHANICS NIRM UNIT A TRADE UNION REGISTERED UNDER THE TRADE UNIONS ACT, 1926,

Corporation Labour Union, Vs State of TamilNadu

Court: Chennai

MADRASDated : 01.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA W.P.No. 9738 of 2023 & W.M.P.No. 9820 of 2023 Corporation Labour Union, Rep. by its President, Beulah John Selvaraj Having office at 39, Water Tank Road, Poonga Nagar, Chennai-600

General Labour Union (Red Flag) Vs. Arjandas Metal Industries Pvt. Ltd ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (2003)IIILLJ1020Bom

its efforts to employ rest of the employees during the trial period of 12 months. (V) The Complainant Union, its Office-bearers and its member-employees are hereby restrained from causing any obstruction and prevention in any manner to … justification for allowing the impugned order to be in force.9. Rule is made absolute in the above terms. Labour and Industrial - jurisdiction - Section 30 (2) of Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair

United Labour Union Vs. Air India Ltd. and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2004(6)BomCR121; [2004(104)FLR1014]; (2005)ILLJ514Bom; 2005(1)MhLj475

F.I. Rebello, J.1. Rule. Heard forthwith.2. The petitioner Union, seeking to represent, the workers working in the canteen known as Dining Facilities Center at Air India Building, … No. 1 by letter of 20th June, 2002. The matter was thereafter taken up with the Commissioner for Labour (Central) by letter of 26th June, 2002. A statement of justification was filed on 18th July, 2002. In