Labor Union - Judgment Search Results

Ongc Labour Union Vs. Ongc Dehradun

Court: Supreme Court of India

OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.__8114____OF2019REPORTABLE (ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.5805 OF2019 ONGC LABOUR UNION APPELLANT(S) VERSUS ONGC DEHRADUN & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT Hrishikesh Roy, J.1. Leave granted. Heard Mr. Colin Gonsalves,

Papnasam Labour Union Vs. Madura Coats Ltd. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1995SC2200; (1995)97BOMLR319; [1995(70)FLR319]; JT1995(1)SC71; 1995LabIC735; 1994(5)SCALE153; (1995)1SCC501; [1994]Supp6SCR369; (1995)1UPLBEC479

Court in invalidating Section 25-O of the Industrial Disputes Act in the decision rendered in Excel Wear v. Union of India : (1978)IILLJ527SC . The Madras High Court further held that in view of its finding that … petition respondent No. 1 also prayed that the State of Tamil Nadu represented by the Secretary to Government, Labour and Employment Department, Madras should be restrained from enforcing the provisions of the said industrial Dispute (Amendment) Act

General Labour Union (Red Flag), Bombay Vs. Ahmedabad Mfg. and Calico ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1995)IILLJ765SC; 1995Supp(1)SCC175

filed a complaint before the Industrial Court under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (the 'Act') complaining of the breach of Items 1(a), (b), 4(a), (f) and 6 of … Sawant, J.1. The appellant-union had filed a complaint before the Industrial Court under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (the 'Act') complaining of the breach of Items 1(a), (b),

General Labour Union (Red Flag) Bombay Vs. B.V. Chavan and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1985SC297; (1985)87BOMLR38; [1985(50)FLR16]; 1985LabIC726; (1985)ILLJ82SC; 1984(2)SCALE749; (1985)1SCC312; [1985]2SCR64; 1985(17)LC226(SC)

D.A. Desai, J.1. General Labour Union (Red Flag) Bombay filed two complaints, one against M/s. Delta Wires Pvt Ltd. and second against 'M/s.

Bombay Labour Union Representing the Workmen of International Franchis ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1966SC942; [1966(12)FLR161]; (1966)ILLJ417SC; [1966]2SCR493

day now to stress the absolute freedom of an employer to impose any condition which he likes on labour. It is always open to industrial adjudication to consider the conditions of employment of labour and to vary … Service so requires, call upon her to resign.' 7. It will be seen that this rule for the India Administrative Service is not unqualified like the rule in force in the respondent's concern. It only lays down

United Labour Union Vs. Air India Ltd. and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2004(6)BomCR121; [2004(104)FLR1014]; (2005)ILLJ514Bom; 2005(1)MhLj475

F.I. Rebello, J.1. Rule. Heard forthwith.2. The petitioner Union, seeking to represent, the workers working in the canteen known as Dining Facilities Center at Air India Building, … No. 1 by letter of 20th June, 2002. The matter was thereafter taken up with the Commissioner for Labour (Central) by letter of 26th June, 2002. A statement of justification was filed on 18th July, 2002. In

Pune Labour Union Through Its President Vs. State of Maharashtra, Indu ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2010(112)BomLR250; 2010(1)MhLj806

F.I. Rebello, J.1. The petitioners are the registered Union seeking to represent the workmen earlier employed with respondent No. 3. It is the case of the petitioners … to raise a dispute, but, the concerned authority did not refer the dispute to the Industrial Tribunal or Labour Court. By its order dated 10.6.2002, the Appropriate Government was pleased to reject the request for reference for

Delhi Labour Union Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (2009)IIILLJ423Del

ORDER1. The Delhi Labour Union has filed the present Public Interest Litigation impugning the order dated April 30, 2004 passed by District

Textiles Labour Union, Nadiad Through Authorised Representative Vs. Un ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2007)2GLR1202

B.J. Shethna, J.1. The petitioner Textile Labour Union has filed this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and challenged the impugned … (2006)6SCC207 .(ii) Navinchandra N. Majithia v. State of Maharashtra : AIR2000SC2966 .(iii) Exphar Sa and Anr. v. Eupharma Laboratories Ltd. and Anr. : 2004(28)PTC251(SC) .(iv) National Textile Corporation Limited and Ors. v. Haribox Swalram and Ors. :

Ongc Labour Union Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [2004(102)FLR461]; (2005)3GLR1941

R.M. Doshit, J.1. This group of petitions have been preferred by the ONGC Labour Union (hereinafter referred to as 'the Union') under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitions are