Skip to content


Labor Union - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: labor union Page 1 of about 113 results (0.039 seconds)
Dec 06 1951 (HC)

Madura Labour Union and Anr. Vs. Madura Mills Workers' Co-operative St ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1954)ILLJ457Mad

with the amendment of the by-laws by which the Madura Labour Union was denied a place in the directorate and the 300, all of whom were members of the Madura Labour Union, which was a union registered under the Trade Unions Act

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 26 1994 (HC)

Madras Labour Union Vs. Binny Ltd. (Buckingham and Carnatic Mills) and ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1996]87CompCas438(Mad); 1995(1)CTC73; (1995)ILLJ588Mad

on March 18, 1992, before the Special Deputy Commissioner of Labour and further conciliation proceedings were held before the Commissioner of The union of staff members (seventh respondent) and the Bangalore union (eighth respondent) have also accepted the same. It is further

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 17 2019 (SC)

Ongc Labour Union Vs. Ongc Dehradun

Court: Supreme Court of India

the High Court. The respondent-ONGC, Dehradun shall implead all these labour Unions and serve notice upon them. The respective senior 14 was made, the ONGC should have arrayed the representative Labour Union whose members are likely to be impacted by the Court

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 16 1989 (HC)

United Labour Union and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1989)91BOMLR770; [1990(60)FLR686]; (1991)ILLJ89Bom

it is finally ascertained that there is no valid contract labour.44. To consider these rival submissions, the aims, objects and the 2 All E.R. 327, Swadeshi Cotton Mills T. S. P. Union v. National Textile Corporation Ltd. reported in : (1984)ILLJ140Mad and

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 01 1996 (HC)

Chemical Labour Union Vs. Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1997)1GLR93

appointed under Section 25-O of the Act, i.e., Commissioner of Labour for the State of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, a notice has be made available to the responsible office-bearers of the respective Unions. The Company has also ostensibly agreed to supply a copy

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 09 2003 (HC)

ispat Labour Union, Steel Employees Association and Dillip Kumar Mohap ...

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 97(2004)CLT194

learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the Asst. Labour Commissioner-cum-Returning Officer submitted that final voter list had already been ballot voting.(2) In the application to be filed by the Unions for registration as recognized Union in Form-A a declaration is

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 06 1967 (HC)

CochIn Dock Labour Union (by Its Secretary) and ors. Vs. CochIn Dock L ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: (1967)IILLJ108Ker

7 December 1968 (copy Ex P. 2) from the Chief Labour Commissioner (Central), Ministry of Labour, to the general secretary, Port, it was stated that the question of recognition of the union should be taken up only after the code of discipline

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 06 2007 (HC)

Navjagrut Labour Union and anr. Vs. Ahmedabad Electricity Co. Ltd. and ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [2007(115)FLR600]; (2008)IILLJ175Guj

of the Learned single Judge confirming the order of the Labour Court as well as Industrial Court is not maintainable. He reference is made to the Industrial Court by the representative Union, neither any individual employee nor any other Union can act

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 02 1968 (HC)

Poona Labour Union (Through Its Secretary) Vs. State of Maharashtra an ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1969)IILLJ291Bom

sent to the conciliation officer, Poona Division, the Commissioner of Labour, Bombay, and the Deputy Commissioner of Labour (Administration), Bombay. On the verification officer will not allow the representatives of any union or management to be present.'8. We see no justification in

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 31 2001 (HC)

Mumbai Labour Union Vs. Indo French Time Industries Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (2002)3BOMLR201; [2002]110CompCas408(Bom); [2001(91)FLR1194]; 2002(2)MhLj405

the employees and the Union have alternative remedies under various labour laws i.e. the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the Payment of Company was closed. It has challenged the claim of the Union for wages till December, 1999 as the employees had not

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //