Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Kos - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 02 2026

Ko.Ganesan Vs Ka.Ganesan

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-02-2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :02.03.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Ko.Ganesan ... Appellant Vs. Ka.Ganesan ...Respondent PRAYER: Appeal filed under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, as against the judgment...


Jul 10 2025

Shri. Willy Ko vs the State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jul-10-2025

-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9685 OF 2023 BETWEEN:1. SHRI. WILLY KO, S/O MR. KO FOOK YUEN,...


Oct 30 2001

Ko and in India Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Excise, Hyderabad and ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Oct-30-2001

Reported in: 2001(6)ALD496; 2002(1)ALT79; 2002(145)ELT38(AP)

S.R. Nayak, J.1. In both the writ petitions, the validity and legality of the seizure of certain goods intended to be exported to Libya is assailed. Hence both the writ petitions were clubbed and heard together...


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 22 1952

In Re: Ko-ku-la Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-22-1952

Reported in: AIR1953Cal387,[1953]23CompCas81(Cal),57CWN136

ORDERP.B. Mukharji, J.1. This is an application by the judgment-creditor for the winding up of the company called Ko-Ku-La Ltd. The grounds on which the petition is being prosecuted by the judgment-creditor are first, that the...


Nov 23 1926

Ko. KA. Bashikar and anr. Vs. Thandrinatha Srinivasa Thathachariar and ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-23-1926

Reported in: AIR1927Mad551; 102Ind.Cas.328; (1927)52MLJ541

Kumaraswami Sastri, J.1. Plaintiffs are the appellants. They are Thengalai Vaishnava Brahmins. The respondents belong to the Vadagalai Vishnava sect and are the dharmakarthas of the Devarajaswami temple in Conjeevaram. In the Devarajaswami temple there is...


Jun 13 1911

Ko Tho HnyIn Vs. Ma HnIn I.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-13-1911

Reported in: (1911)13BOMLR694

Macnaghten, J.1. Their Lordships are of opinion that the judgment under appeal is right. If the appellant had applied for leave to appeal, and his application had been refused, there could not have been any appeal....


Jul 20 1893

Ko Shway Aung and ors. Vs. Strang Steel and Co.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jul-20-1893

Reported in: (1894)ILR21Cal241

W. Comer Petheram, C.J., Norris and Pigot, JJ.1. This reference has been already twice before the Court, but could not be disposed of, as on neither occasion was the document in respect of which it is...


Dec 01 2025

Kariyappa S/O. Laxman Sanadi vs Doddavva Ko. Mahadevappa Vaded

Court: Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on: Dec-01-2025

-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 104043 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: KARIYAPPA S/O. LAXMAN SANADI, AGE....


May 17 2011

Sadagoparamanujam, the Senior Manager and Another Vs. ThA.Ko.Venkatach ...

Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai

Decided on: May-17-2011

The Appellants as complainants filed a complaint before the District Forum, Dharmapuri, alleging deficiency against the opposite parties to pay Rs.2,00,000/- for breach of trust, mental agony etc and to pay Rs.6,500/- towards expenses. The District...


May 03 1940

Alagu Sundarammal Vs. Ko. So. Thiruvengadathu Aiyangar

Court: Chennai

Decided on: May-03-1940

Reported in: AIR1941Mad100(1); (1940)2MLJ379

Horwill, J.1. The petitioner was a close relative and a creditor of the respondent. The suit debt was incurred in 1928 in Devakottah, where both the petitioner and the respondent were living. The respondent has a...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial