Kos - Judgment Search Results
Ko.Ganesan Vs Ka.Ganesan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :02.03.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Ko.Ganesan ... Appellant Vs. Ka.Ganesan ...Respondent PRAYER: Appeal filed under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, as against the judgment...
Shri. Willy Ko vs the State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-10-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9685 OF 2023 BETWEEN:1. SHRI. WILLY KO, S/O MR. KO FOOK YUEN,...
Ko and in India Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Excise, Hyderabad and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-30-2001
Reported in: 2001(6)ALD496; 2002(1)ALT79; 2002(145)ELT38(AP)
S.R. Nayak, J.1. In both the writ petitions, the validity and legality of the seizure of certain goods intended to be exported to Libya is assailed. Hence both the writ petitions were clubbed and heard together...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
In Re: Ko-ku-la Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-22-1952
Reported in: AIR1953Cal387,[1953]23CompCas81(Cal),57CWN136
ORDERP.B. Mukharji, J.1. This is an application by the judgment-creditor for the winding up of the company called Ko-Ku-La Ltd. The grounds on which the petition is being prosecuted by the judgment-creditor are first, that the...
Ko. KA. Bashikar and anr. Vs. Thandrinatha Srinivasa Thathachariar and ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-23-1926
Reported in: AIR1927Mad551; 102Ind.Cas.328; (1927)52MLJ541
Kumaraswami Sastri, J.1. Plaintiffs are the appellants. They are Thengalai Vaishnava Brahmins. The respondents belong to the Vadagalai Vishnava sect and are the dharmakarthas of the Devarajaswami temple in Conjeevaram. In the Devarajaswami temple there is...
Ko Tho HnyIn Vs. Ma HnIn I.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-13-1911
Reported in: (1911)13BOMLR694
Macnaghten, J.1. Their Lordships are of opinion that the judgment under appeal is right. If the appellant had applied for leave to appeal, and his application had been refused, there could not have been any appeal....
Ko Shway Aung and ors. Vs. Strang Steel and Co.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-20-1893
Reported in: (1894)ILR21Cal241
W. Comer Petheram, C.J., Norris and Pigot, JJ.1. This reference has been already twice before the Court, but could not be disposed of, as on neither occasion was the document in respect of which it is...
Kariyappa S/O. Laxman Sanadi vs Doddavva Ko. Mahadevappa Vaded
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Dec-01-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWADDATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 104043 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: KARIYAPPA S/O. LAXMAN SANADI, AGE....
Sadagoparamanujam, the Senior Manager and Another Vs. ThA.Ko.Venkatach ...
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: May-17-2011
The Appellants as complainants filed a complaint before the District Forum, Dharmapuri, alleging deficiency against the opposite parties to pay Rs.2,00,000/- for breach of trust, mental agony etc and to pay Rs.6,500/- towards expenses. The District...
Alagu Sundarammal Vs. Ko. So. Thiruvengadathu Aiyangar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-03-1940
Reported in: AIR1941Mad100(1); (1940)2MLJ379
Horwill, J.1. The petitioner was a close relative and a creditor of the respondent. The suit debt was incurred in 1928 in Devakottah, where both the petitioner and the respondent were living. The respondent has a...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free