Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: konkan passenger ships acquisition act 1973 chapter i preliminary Page 4 of about 373 results (0.245 seconds)

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Kadviben Udabhai Rathwa and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : IV(2006)ACC345; 2006ACJ2019; AIR2006Guj120; (2006)2GLR1257

..... , legal heirs preferred claims both under section 140 and 166 of the m.v. act. these applications were opposed by the insurance company on grounds that the claimants were gratuitous passengers travelling in a goods vehicle, they did not suffer permanent disability, their names were not in the f.i.r./charge-sheet and nexus with the accident and injuries was ..... vehicle as a whole. this is proposed to be altered in the case of public service vehicles to provide a limit with reference to the passengers. the limit with respect to the insurers' liability to a passenger involved in an accident in a public service vehicle is being fixed at rs. 15,000/-. the existing limits of insurance liability in respect of .....

Swayam Realtors and Traders Llp Vs. the Appellate Authority Industrial ...

Court : Mumbai

..... borivali, district greater mumbai [described in sr. no. 4 of annexure a hereto] and that the same cannot be treated as surplus vacant land and is not liable for acquisition under the urban land (ceiling and development) act, 1976; (ii) the order dated 27.9.1994, notice dated 5.3.2004, the notifications dated 11.3.2004 ..... situate at village magathane, taluka borviali, district greater mumbai [described in sr. no. 4 of exhibit a hereto] cannot be treated as surplus vacant land and not liable for acquisition under the urban land (ceiling and development) act, 1976; (ii) consequently, the order dated 27.9.1994, notice dated 5.3.2004, the notifications dated 11.3. ..... provides for 'deemed withdrawal', the additional collector and competent authority issued a notification under section 10(1) of the ulc in respect of the subject property for the acquisition of the same by the state. this was followed by notification dated 16.05.2005 under section 10(3) of the ulc declaring the subject property to be .....

Binod Rao Vs. Minocher Rustom Masani

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1976)78BOMLR125

..... of the powers conferred by the said section 5(8) the central board of revenue issued instructions laying down the principles to be applied by assessing authorities in assessing foreign shipping- companies. these instructions were not followed by the income-tax officer, and in making the assessment he did not allow certain allowances to the assessees. the supreme court held that .....

Madan Malji Kambli and Others Vs. State of Goa, Through Its Chief Secr ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

..... safe guide for construction and interpretation of the term appropriate government or the words for the purpose of the union. ultimately, the land acquisition act enables acquisition of lands by resort to the sovereign and supreme power of the state. that power is exercised for public purpose and in public interest so ..... cannot be the slightest doubt that the state of haryana incurs considerable expenditure for the maintenance of roads and providing for the transport of goods and passengers within the state of haryana. the maintenance of highways other than the national highways is exclusively the responsibility of the state government. while the ..... terminal with 4500 sq mtrs of floor area. the total cost of the project was estimated at us$205 m, including soft costs, infrastructure works, passenger terminal, control tower, all navigational and meteorological equipment, other facilities and utilities connection, but excluding land expropriation, and the construction of the new highway to .....

A.P. Civil Liberties Committee (Apclc) Rep. by Its President, Mr. S. S ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(1)ALT754

..... assumption that is at clear variance with the law. illustrations by the full bench majority of an extremists killing in a village in the state or of arson of a passenger train by extremists' organization, are also non-sequitor, for reason alike.296. in pucl (8 supra) in manipur, a disturbed area with a considerable component of terrorists activity affecting public ..... full bench majority in apclc (6 supra) conceived illustrations from the attack on parliament; an extremist killing in some village in the state; and an act of arson on a passenger train by persons claiming to belong to an extremist organization where about 50 persons died. the majority reasoned that in these instances if the intervention of the police and the .....

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Soran Singh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1829

..... kumar, whose evidence was to the effect that the accused was travelling in the rickshaw and it was stopped by pwl7 head constable. that there was only one passenger, namely, the accused, travelling in the rickshaw was the evidence of pw-7. inconsistency in this regard is irreconcilable. as to who stopped the rickshaw and conducted ..... the negative. two persons, according to rickshaw puller, pw-1, were travelling in the rickshaw and one of them was the accused. what happened to the other passenger, there is no evidence. the rickshaw was stopped in a public place when the accused was allegedly subjected to search. clause (b) of section 43 lays down ..... was one of total denial. the learned judge was of the opinion that the prosecution story bristled with inconsistencies. according to pw-1, rickshaw puller, there were two passengers in his rickshaw - accused and another one and the rickshaw was stopped by one sunder singh, homeguard constable, who seized the bag, which contained two packets of .....

V.S. Achuthanandan Vs. G. Kamalamma and anr.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2008CriLJ4221; 2008(2)KLJ417; 2008(3)KLT346

ORDERV.K. Mohanan, J.1. The above three Crl.M.Cs are filed by different accused in C.C. No. 675/2007, pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvananthapuram. Crl.M.C. No. 4159/2003 is preferred by the 1st accused in the above case and Crl.M.C. No. 5631/2003 is preferred by the 3rd accused whereas Crl.M.C. No. 755/2004 is filed by the 2nd accused in the same case. Since these Crl.M.Cs are arising out of the same case, all the petitioners are accused in the very same case and factual background and arguments are more or less same, these Crl.M.Cs are heard together and being disposed of by this common order.2. As stated earlier, the petitioners herein are accused in C.C. No. 675/2007 which is a case instituted upon a private complaint for the offence punishable under Section 500 read with Section 34 of I.P.C. The above private complaint is preferred by one G. Kamalamma who is the 1st respondent in these Crl.M.Cs. The allegation in the complaint can be summarized as fo...

M/S. Bharti Airtel Ltd., Rep by Its Head-legal and Regulatory, S. Naga ...

Court : Karnataka

..... use. but the goods must be in existence and deliverable when the right is sought to be transferred. 111. traditionally, a contract for carriage of goods or passengers is by roadways, railways, airways and waterways. this is associated with carriage of tangible goods. such a carrier has no right over the goods of the ..... published in the official gazette, permit, subject to such restrictions and conditions as it thinks fit, the establishment, maintenance and working- (a) of wireless telegraphs on ships within indian territorial waters and on aircraft within or above india, or indian territorial waters, and (b) of telegraphs other than wireless telegraphs within any part of india ..... and transmit data/voice of different users through the same ofcs. this ofcs can be compared to the train where different passengers get-in and get-off at different passengers, the cost of transportation per passenger gets reduced. the ofc can be compared to the train. the diesel for the train can be compared to the .....

State Vs. Gali Chalapathi Rao and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1974CriLJ1424

Sambasiya Rao, J.1. This Criminal Revision case has boon placed before us in a Division Bench on a reference made by our learned brother Mukhtadar, J. The question of law that arises in the case and which has been argued before us at great length is whether the Court has power and discretion, while remanding the accused to custody under Section 344, Cr.P.C. to remand him into police custody. To put the question in other words It is, whether the Court has to remand an accuseed, while dealing with an offence which it has taken cognizance of, only to judicial or jail custody and has no discretion whatever under any circumstances to remand him to police custody.2. This question has arisen in the following manner. One K. Vedagiri Rao was attacked in the afternoon of 27-10.72 by a large number of persons and was caused fatal injuries to which he succumbed subsequently. 19 persons were charged under Sections 302, 149, 148, 120B, I.P.C. etc. Though all the accused were absconding for some time...

Ramkrishna Bus Transport and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1994)2GLR1371

..... proviso to sub-section (1) of section 207.56. now, it cannot be gainsaid that detention of a vehicle en route would result into inconvenience to passengers. but then, the court cannot direct police officers and authorised persons to ignore, overlook or disregard statutory provisions nor can restrain them from exercising powers in ..... r.t.a., chittoor, reported in air 1988 mad. 274. in that case, the high court of madras held that merely because separate fares were collected from passengers individually, the 'contract carriage' would not become 'stage carriage'. on the other hand, mr. n.d. nanavati cited a recent decision of the hon'ble supreme ..... the respondents detain vehicles and seize them en route which results into irreparable hardship, not only to the owners and organisers of tour programme but to passengers travelling therein. such action is arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable. the petitioners have alleged that the owners and organisers have been asked to get the offence compounded .....