Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: konkan passenger ships acquisition act 1973 chapter i preliminary Court: supreme court of india Page 1 of about 29 results (0.173 seconds)

Shin-etsu Chemical Co. Ltd. Vs. Aksh Optifibre Ltd. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2005SC3766; 2005(3)ARBLR1(SC); 2005(4)AWC3851(SC); [2005]127CompCas97(SC); 2005(4)CTC297; JT2005(7)SC426; (2005)4MLJ84(SC); (2005)7SCC234; 2005(2)LC1277(SC)

..... to refuse a reference to arbitration if it 'finds' that the arbitration agreement is 'null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed'.4. this court in konkan railways corporation ltd. and ors. v. mehul construction co. : air2000sc2821 pointed out that parliament had clearly indicated that the act had substantially adopted the model law ..... .'90. the court after examining the documents and taking into account the commercial reality of the situation came to the conclusion that the plaintiffs, i.e., shipping company has made out a 'strongly arguable case' in support of the existence of an arbitration agreement. the court further observed that 'obviously it has not ..... to examine in detail the documents since the parties failed to produce the document containing the authorization given to the broker to act on behalf of the shipping company. therefore, the court has referred to the commercial reality as well as the affidavits of the parties to arrive at the conclusion that there was .....

S.B.P. and Co. Vs. Patel Engineering Ltd. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC450; 2006(1)ALD10(SC); 2005(3)ARBLR285(SC); 2006(1)AWC538(SC); 2006(1)BomCR585; [2005]128CompCas465(SC); (2006)2CompLJ7(SC); 2005(5)CTC302; (2006)3GLR2097; [2006(1

..... tea association v. ajit kumar barat, : (2000)illj809sc ]several similar actions having far reaching consequences have been held administrative, for instance, an order of acquisition or requisition of property; an order making an appointment to a civil post, an order granting sanction to prosecute a public servant; etc.it cannot be gainsaid ..... (2000)9scc406 ; ouseph mathai and ors. v. m. abdul khadir; : air2002sc110 ]in state of orissa and ors. v. gokulananda jena, : air2003sc4207, relying upon konkan railway corporation ltd. ii, the high court of orissa held that since the order passed by the chief justice was administrative, it was not amenable to writ jurisdiction under ..... before a two-judge bench, an order was passed directing the registry to place the papers before hon. the chief justice for passing appropriate orders. konkan railway corporation ltd. i was thus placed before a constitution bench of five judges. the constitution bench, : [2002]1scr728 considered the relevant provisions .....

Technip S.A. Vs. Sms Holding (Pvt.) Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : III(2005)BC56(SC); [2005]125CompCas545(SC); (2005)4CompLJ385(SC); 2005(4)CTC209; JT2005(5)SC506; (2005)5SCC465; [2005]60SCL249(SC)

..... s letter that they were ultimately planning to take over coflexip and they 'were on this merger, passing through a number of necessary stages: which included 'the acquisition of 30% of coflexip in april 2000...'(vi) 'isis has its nominees on the board of technip. isis has its nominees of coflexip. ..............thus in a ..... 'person acting in concert'. we are concerned with sub-section (i) which says that it comprises 'persons who, for a common objective or purpose of substantial acquisition of shares or voting rights or gaining control over the target company, pursuant to an agreement or understanding (formal or informal), directly or indirectly co-operate by ..... control over coflexip and therefore seamec treating seamec as the target company. the emphasis is on the target company whether the case is of direct or indirect acquisition under the regulations. thus regulation 2(b) of the regulations defines 'acquirer' as meaning any person who, directly or indirectly, acquires or agrees to acquire .....

Narmada Bachao Andolan Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2000SC3751; (2001)1GLR434; 2000(7)SCALE34; (2000)10SCC664; [2000]Supp4SCR94

..... sanctuary.development of fisheries: deepening of all village tanks of command which will increase their capacities, conserve water, will recharge ground water, save acquisition of costly lands for getting earth required for constructing canal banks and will reduce health hazard.facilities of sophisticated communication system in the entire command. ..... projects in india. there were certain project specific programmes for implementation on temporary basis. for the land acquired, compensation under the provisions of land acquisition act, 1894 used to be given to the project affected families. this payment in cash did not result in satisfactory resettlement of the displaced ..... independent socio-anthropological experts and non-governmental organisations. the functions of this sub-group are as follows:1. to monitor the progress of land acquisition in respect of submergence land of sardar sarovar project and indira (narmada) sagar project (isp).2. to monitor the progress of implementation of the .....

Bangalore City Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the appellant by issuing notification under section 4(1) of the 1894 act. the contents of that letter are reproduced below: the deputy commissioner, bangalore. sub: acquisition of land in vajarahalli and raghuvanahalli villages of uttarahalli hobli, bangalore south taluk in favour of the bangalore city co-operative, housing society ltd., bangalore. i am ..... previous promoters m/s. manasa enterprises (for procuring lands from the agriculturists). 6. whereas the second party has agreed to provide all the required services towards the acquisition of scheduled land for the first party, obtain all necessary approvals for forming the layout, roads, water lines, electric lines, drainage, sewerage connection, etc., and ..... 1991) 2 scc 408, m/s. jindal industries ltd. v. state of haryana 1991 supp (2) scc 587, d.s. parvathamma v. a. srinivasan (2003) 4 scc 705, shipping corpn. of india ltd. v. machado bros. (2004) 11 scc 168, j.p. srivastava & sons (p) ltd. v. gwalior sugar co. ltd., (2005) 1 scc 172 .....

Thyssen Stahlunion Gmbh Vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1999SC3923; [2000]99CompCas383(SC); JT1999(8)SC66; 1999(6)SCALE441; (1999)9SCC334; [1999]Supp3SCR461

..... with them. for these reasons i think the question must be answered in the affirmative....scrutton lj said:the conditions imposed by section 11 were conditions, not of the acquisition of the right, but of its enforcement. section 38 says that repeal of an act shall not (c) 'affect any right...acquired...under any enactment so repealed', ..... the new act. this court has relied on this section as to when arbitral proceedings commence in the case of shetty's construction co. p. ltd. v. konkan railway construction : air1999sc1535 . section 2(2)11 read with section 2(7) 12 and section 21 falling in part-i of the new act make it clear ..... the case of western shipbreaking corporation : (1997)3glr1984 under memorandum of agreement dated november 4, 1994 m/s. clareheaven ltd. agreed to sell to western shipbreaking corporation a ship 'm.v. kaldera'. clause (19) of the memorandum of agreement contained arbitration clause which is as under:if any dispute should arise in connection with the interpretation in .....

S.P. Gupta Vs. President of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1982SC149; 1981Supp(1)SCC87; [1982]2SCR365

..... three other words in association with which it is used. 'transfer' therefore, according to the learned counsel, means a voluntary transfer and cannot include all compulsory acquisition of property.we find it impossible to accept the submission. in the first place if it was intended that voluntary transfers alone should fall within the meaning of ..... who has a genuine grievance because an order has been made which prejudicially affects his interests. has the attorney-general a sufficient interest for this purpose their lord-ships think that he has. the attorney-general in a colony represents the crown as the guardian of the public interest. it is his duty to bring before ..... court who may be moved on occasions by petty considerations such as communalism and favouritism or who may even be capricious in proposing names of persons for judge-ship. the chief justice of india will naturally be able to assess the qualities of persons proposed having in view the standard of efficiency of judges in all .....

Lal Singh Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2001SC746; 2001(1)ALD(Cri)266; 2001ALLMR(Cri)1038(SC); 2001(1)ALT(Cri)304; (2001)2CALLT8(SC); 2001CriLJ978; (2001)3GLR2341; JT2001(1)SC410; 2001(1)SCALE284; (2001)3SCC22

..... bombay to ahmedabad and ahmedabad to bombay lending assurance to his confessional statement that he travelled by air from bombay to ahmedabad and from ahmedabad to bombay by producing passengers manifests. flight coupon ex.450 and entry no.1567 in the guest register of hotel sidhdhartha at ahmedabad in the name of mohd. s. have been proved ..... served alongwith him till may, 1981. thereafter, they were sent to india. subsequently, he along with lal singh and others went to bulgaria and joined services in other ships. it is his say that he served along with lal singh till january, 1984. thereafter, he came back to india and started taxi service. he has stated about ..... other brother mohinder singh was driving taxi. he further stated that in 1978, he got passport and went to rome, where he joined the service of golden union shipping company, as assistant to sailor. there he met ten other indian boys including a1 lal singh who was a sailor and who belongs to village nawapind, akalgadh. he .....

Sharad Birdhichand Sarda Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1984SC1622; (1984)86BOMLR536; 1984CriLJ1738; 1984(2)SCALE445; (1984)4SCC116; [1985]1SCR88

1. This is rather an unfortunate case where a marriage arranged and brought about through the intervention of common friends of the families of the bride and bridegroom though made a good start but ran into rough weather soon thereafter. The bride, Manju, entertained high hopes and aspirations and was not only hoping but was anxiously looking forward to a life full of mirth and merriment, mutual love and devotion between the two spouses. She appears to be an extremely emotional and sensitive girl and at the very behest cherished ideal dreams to be achieved after her marriage, which was solemnised, on Feb. 11, 1902 between her and the appellant, Sharad Birdhichand Sarda. Soon after the marriage, Manju left for her new marital home and started residing with the appellant in Takshila Apartments at Pune. Unfortunately, however, to her utter dismay and disappointment she found that the treatment of her husband and his parents towards her was cruel and harsh and her cherished dreams seem to ...

Suresh Chandra Bahri Vs. State of Bihar with Gurbachan Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1994SC2420; 1994(2)BLJR1147; 1994CriLJ3271; JT1994(4)SC309; 1994(3)SCALE197; 1995Supp(1)SCC80; [1994]Supp1SCR483; 1994(2)LC782(SC)

..... kathmandu police about the missing of his children only after shifting in a private house as giving such a false information from the hotel where the number of the guest/passenger is noted, would have exposed him because in fact the children had not gone with him to kathmandu. but he proved himself only to be a wisest fool in doing ..... per entry at serial no. 576 of the guest register. the entries in the guest register were made by richa bahri which was also signed by suresh. the number of passengers as given in the entry was shown as four coming from delhi and going to ranchi. cbi inspector, rajendra singh, pw 82 seized the register of his hotel. the entries .....